All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okaya@codeaurora.org <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:14:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbaf3dadb8fb6469f49edae6ce6b7d48@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180321.175427.1419929873765406157.davem@davemloft.net>

On 2018-03-21 17:54, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700
> 
>> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>>> wmb().
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
>> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
> 
> For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
> confidence if the code does not even compile.
> 
> Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.

I think the issue is the tree that code is getting tested has 
undelivered code as Alex mentioned.

I was using linux-next 4.16 rc4 for testing.

I will rebase to Jeff's tree.

> 
> Thank you.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	timur@codeaurora.org, sulrich@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:14:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbaf3dadb8fb6469f49edae6ce6b7d48@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180321.175427.1419929873765406157.davem@davemloft.net>

On 2018-03-21 17:54, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700
> 
>> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>>> wmb().
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
>> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
> 
> For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
> confidence if the code does not even compile.
> 
> Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.

I think the issue is the tree that code is getting tested has 
undelivered code as Alex mentioned.

I was using linux-next 4.16 rc4 for testing.

I will rebase to Jeff's tree.

> 
> Thank you.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (okaya at codeaurora.org)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:14:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbaf3dadb8fb6469f49edae6ce6b7d48@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180321.175427.1419929873765406157.davem@davemloft.net>

On 2018-03-21 17:54, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700
> 
>> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>>> wmb().
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
>> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
> 
> For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
> confidence if the code does not even compile.
> 
> Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.

I think the issue is the tree that code is getting tested has 
undelivered code as Alex mentioned.

I was using linux-next 4.16 rc4 for testing.

I will rebase to Jeff's tree.

> 
> Thank you.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-21 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-21 18:56 [PATCH REPOST v4 0/7] netdev: intel: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 1/7] i40e/i40evf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-22 18:52   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bowers, AndrewX
2018-03-21 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 2/7] ixgbe: eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-22 18:51   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bowers, AndrewX
2018-03-21 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 3/7] igbvf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 4/7] igb: " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb() Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 21:48   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeff Kirsher
2018-03-21 21:48     ` Jeff Kirsher
2018-03-21 21:48     ` Jeff Kirsher
2018-03-21 21:51     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " okaya
2018-03-21 21:51       ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2018-03-21 21:51       ` okaya
2018-03-21 21:53       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2018-03-21 21:53         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-03-21 21:53         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-03-21 21:54     ` David Miller
2018-03-21 21:54       ` David Miller
2018-03-21 21:54       ` David Miller
2018-03-21 22:14       ` okaya [this message]
2018-03-21 22:14         ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2018-03-21 22:14         ` okaya
2018-03-21 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 6/7] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 7/7] fm10k: Eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-03-21 18:56   ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bbaf3dadb8fb6469f49edae6ce6b7d48@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.