All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: chao@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
	Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>, Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:38:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc4b29f0-8309-4a36-bdbe-b5f375aec31a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622160830.324455-3-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 6/23/26 00:08, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Large folio write paths need to submit I/O for a range inside a
> folio instead of always submitting the whole folio from offset zero.
> Add idx and cnt to f2fs_io_info to describe the block offset inside
> the folio and the number of contiguous blocks covered by the I/O.
> 
> Apply the new fields to the bio submit paths that need the subpage
> offset or contiguous block count.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c    | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c |  4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 23758c00758d..9a2bb6d982df 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -779,6 +779,8 @@ int f2fs_submit_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	struct folio *fio_folio = fio->folio;
>  	struct folio *data_folio = fio->encrypted_page ?
>  			page_folio(fio->encrypted_page) : fio_folio;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk = fio_folio->index + fio->idx;
> +	unsigned int fio_cnt = fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1;

How about cleaning up w/ below macros?

#define F2FS_FOLIO_INDEX(folio, fio)	(folio->index + fio->folio_offset)
#define F2FS_FOLIO_BLKCNT(fio)		(fio->folio_blkcnt ? fio->folio_blkcnt : 1)

>  
>  	if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(fio->sbi, fio->new_blkaddr,
>  			fio->is_por ? META_POR : (__is_meta_io(fio) ?
> @@ -791,11 +793,13 @@ int f2fs_submit_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	bio = __bio_alloc(fio, 1);
>  
>  	f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx(bio, fio_folio->mapping->host,
> -			fio_folio->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> -	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, data_folio, folio_size(data_folio), 0);
> +			fio_lblk, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> +	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, data_folio,
> +			F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt), fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  
>  	if (fio->io_wbc && !is_read_io(fio->op))
> -		wbc_account_cgroup_owner(fio->io_wbc, fio_folio, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		wbc_account_cgroup_owner(fio->io_wbc, fio_folio,
> +				F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt));
>  
>  	inc_page_count(fio->sbi, is_read_io(fio->op) ?
>  			__read_io_type(data_folio) : WB_DATA_TYPE(fio->folio, false));
> @@ -840,7 +844,8 @@ static bool io_is_mergeable(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct bio *bio,
>  }
>  
>  static void add_bio_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct bio *bio,
> -				struct folio *folio, enum temp_type temp)
> +				struct folio *folio, size_t len, size_t offset,
> +				enum temp_type temp)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_bio_info *io = sbi->write_io[DATA] + temp;
>  	struct bio_entry *be;
> @@ -849,7 +854,7 @@ static void add_bio_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct bio *bio,
>  	be->bio = bio;
>  	bio_get(bio);
>  
> -	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, folio, folio_size(folio), 0);
> +	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, folio, len, offset);
>  
>  	f2fs_down_write(&io->bio_list_lock);
>  	list_add_tail(&be->list, &io->bio_list);
> @@ -866,6 +871,8 @@ static int add_ipu_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, struct bio **bio,
>  							struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	struct folio *fio_folio = fio->folio;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk = fio_folio->index + fio->idx;
> +	unsigned int fio_cnt = fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1;
>  	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = fio->sbi;
>  	enum temp_type temp;
>  	bool found = false;
> @@ -888,8 +895,10 @@ static int add_ipu_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, struct bio **bio,
>  							    fio->new_blkaddr));
>  			if (f2fs_crypt_mergeable_bio(*bio,
>  					fio_folio->mapping->host,
> -					fio_folio->index, fio) &&
> -			    bio_add_folio(*bio, folio, folio_size(folio), 0)) {
> +					fio_lblk, fio) &&
> +			    bio_add_folio(*bio, folio,
> +					F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt),
> +					fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT)) {
>  				ret = 0;
>  				break;
>  			}
> @@ -1003,6 +1012,7 @@ int f2fs_merge_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	struct folio *data_folio = fio->encrypted_page ?
>  			page_folio(fio->encrypted_page) : fio->folio;
>  	struct folio *folio = fio->folio;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk = folio->index + fio->idx;
>  
>  	if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(fio->sbi, fio->new_blkaddr,
>  			__is_meta_io(fio) ? META_GENERIC : DATA_GENERIC))
> @@ -1017,9 +1027,11 @@ int f2fs_merge_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	if (!bio) {
>  		bio = __bio_alloc(fio, BIO_MAX_VECS);
>  		f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx(bio, folio->mapping->host,
> -				folio->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> +				fio_lblk, fio, GFP_NOIO);
>  
> -		add_bio_entry(fio->sbi, bio, data_folio, fio->temp);
> +		add_bio_entry(fio->sbi, bio, data_folio,
> +				F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1),
> +				fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT, fio->temp);
>  	} else {
>  		if (add_ipu_page(fio, &bio, data_folio))
>  			goto alloc_new;
> @@ -1030,7 +1042,7 @@ int f2fs_merge_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  
>  	inc_page_count(fio->sbi, WB_DATA_TYPE(folio, false));
>  
> -	*fio->last_block = fio->new_blkaddr;
> +	*fio->last_block = fio->new_blkaddr + (fio->cnt ? fio->cnt - 1 : 0);
>  	*fio->bio = bio;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1066,6 +1078,10 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	struct folio *bio_folio;
>  	struct f2fs_lock_context lc;
>  	enum count_type type;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk;
> +	unsigned int fio_cnt;
> +	size_t bio_offset;
> +	size_t bio_len;
>  
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_read_io(fio->op));
>  
> @@ -1104,6 +1120,9 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	/* set submitted = true as a return value */
>  	fio->submitted = 1;
>  
> +	fio_lblk = fio->folio->index + fio->idx;
> +	fio_cnt = fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1;
> +
>  	type = WB_DATA_TYPE(bio_folio, fio->compressed_page);
>  	inc_page_count(sbi, type);
>  
> @@ -1111,26 +1130,29 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	    (!io_is_mergeable(sbi, io->bio, io, fio, io->last_block_in_bio,
>  			      fio->new_blkaddr) ||
>  	     !f2fs_crypt_mergeable_bio(io->bio, fio_inode(fio),
> -				bio_folio->index, fio)))
> +				fio_lblk, fio)))
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
>  alloc_new:
>  	if (io->bio == NULL) {
>  		io->bio = __bio_alloc(fio, BIO_MAX_VECS);
>  		f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx(io->bio, fio_inode(fio),
> -				bio_folio->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> +				fio_lblk, fio, GFP_NOIO);
>  		io->fio = *fio;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!bio_add_folio(io->bio, bio_folio, folio_size(bio_folio), 0)) {
> +	bio_offset = fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	bio_len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt);
> +
> +	if (!bio_add_folio(io->bio, bio_folio, bio_len, bio_offset)) {
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
>  		goto alloc_new;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (fio->io_wbc)
>  		wbc_account_cgroup_owner(fio->io_wbc, fio->folio,
> -				folio_size(fio->folio));
> +				F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt));

bio_len));

>  
> -	io->last_block_in_bio = fio->new_blkaddr;
> +	io->last_block_in_bio = fio->new_blkaddr + fio_cnt - 1;
>  
>  	trace_f2fs_submit_folio_write(fio->folio, fio);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> @@ -2992,7 +3014,7 @@ bool f2fs_should_update_outplace(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		return true;
>  
>  	if (fio) {
> -		if (page_private_gcing(fio->page))
> +		if (folio_test_f2fs_gcing(fio->folio))

Should this change belong to patch 1?

>  			return true;
>  		if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) &&
>  			f2fs_is_checkpointed_data(sbi, fio->old_blkaddr)))
> @@ -3031,7 +3053,7 @@ int f2fs_do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
>  
>  	if (need_inplace_update(fio) &&
> -	    f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, folio->index,
> +	    f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, folio->index + fio->idx,
>  						&fio->old_blkaddr)) {
>  		if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(fio->sbi, fio->old_blkaddr,
>  						DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))
> @@ -3050,7 +3072,7 @@ int f2fs_do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	if (fio->need_lock == LOCK_REQ && !f2fs_trylock_op(fio->sbi, &lc))
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  
> -	err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, folio->index, LOOKUP_NODE);
> +	err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, folio->index + fio->idx, LOOKUP_NODE);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out;
>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index e4778c17394e..4c2902abe499 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1351,6 +1351,8 @@ struct f2fs_io_info {
>  	blk_opf_t op_flags;	/* req_flag_bits */
>  	block_t new_blkaddr;	/* new block address to be written */
>  	block_t old_blkaddr;	/* old block address before Cow */
> +	pgoff_t idx;		/* start block offset in the folio */

How about

pgoff_t folio_offset;		/* offset in large folio */

> +	unsigned int cnt;	/* block count in the folio */

unsigned int folio_blkcnt;	/* block count in large folio */

>  	union {
>  		struct page *page;	/* page to be written */
>  		struct folio *folio;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index d71ddb3ee918..43d41bb3b4b1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ static int __get_segment_type_6(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ALIGNED_WRITE))
>  			return CURSEG_COLD_DATA_PINNED;
>  
> -		if (page_private_gcing(fio->page)) {
> +		if (folio_test_f2fs_gcing(fio->folio)) {

Should this change belong to patch 1?

Thanks,

>  			if (fio->sbi->am.atgc_enabled &&
>  				(fio->io_type == FS_DATA_IO) &&
>  				(fio->sbi->gc_mode != GC_URGENT_HIGH) &&
> @@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ static int __get_segment_type_6(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		if (file_is_cold(inode) || f2fs_need_compress_data(inode))
>  			return CURSEG_COLD_DATA;
>  
> -		type = __get_age_segment_type(inode, fio->folio->index);
> +		type = __get_age_segment_type(inode, fio->folio->index + fio->idx);
>  		if (type != NO_CHECK_TYPE)
>  			return type;
>  


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
	Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:38:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc4b29f0-8309-4a36-bdbe-b5f375aec31a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622160830.324455-3-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 6/23/26 00:08, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Large folio write paths need to submit I/O for a range inside a
> folio instead of always submitting the whole folio from offset zero.
> Add idx and cnt to f2fs_io_info to describe the block offset inside
> the folio and the number of contiguous blocks covered by the I/O.
> 
> Apply the new fields to the bio submit paths that need the subpage
> offset or contiguous block count.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c    | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c |  4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 23758c00758d..9a2bb6d982df 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -779,6 +779,8 @@ int f2fs_submit_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	struct folio *fio_folio = fio->folio;
>  	struct folio *data_folio = fio->encrypted_page ?
>  			page_folio(fio->encrypted_page) : fio_folio;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk = fio_folio->index + fio->idx;
> +	unsigned int fio_cnt = fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1;

How about cleaning up w/ below macros?

#define F2FS_FOLIO_INDEX(folio, fio)	(folio->index + fio->folio_offset)
#define F2FS_FOLIO_BLKCNT(fio)		(fio->folio_blkcnt ? fio->folio_blkcnt : 1)

>  
>  	if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(fio->sbi, fio->new_blkaddr,
>  			fio->is_por ? META_POR : (__is_meta_io(fio) ?
> @@ -791,11 +793,13 @@ int f2fs_submit_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	bio = __bio_alloc(fio, 1);
>  
>  	f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx(bio, fio_folio->mapping->host,
> -			fio_folio->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> -	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, data_folio, folio_size(data_folio), 0);
> +			fio_lblk, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> +	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, data_folio,
> +			F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt), fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  
>  	if (fio->io_wbc && !is_read_io(fio->op))
> -		wbc_account_cgroup_owner(fio->io_wbc, fio_folio, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		wbc_account_cgroup_owner(fio->io_wbc, fio_folio,
> +				F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt));
>  
>  	inc_page_count(fio->sbi, is_read_io(fio->op) ?
>  			__read_io_type(data_folio) : WB_DATA_TYPE(fio->folio, false));
> @@ -840,7 +844,8 @@ static bool io_is_mergeable(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct bio *bio,
>  }
>  
>  static void add_bio_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct bio *bio,
> -				struct folio *folio, enum temp_type temp)
> +				struct folio *folio, size_t len, size_t offset,
> +				enum temp_type temp)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_bio_info *io = sbi->write_io[DATA] + temp;
>  	struct bio_entry *be;
> @@ -849,7 +854,7 @@ static void add_bio_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct bio *bio,
>  	be->bio = bio;
>  	bio_get(bio);
>  
> -	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, folio, folio_size(folio), 0);
> +	bio_add_folio_nofail(bio, folio, len, offset);
>  
>  	f2fs_down_write(&io->bio_list_lock);
>  	list_add_tail(&be->list, &io->bio_list);
> @@ -866,6 +871,8 @@ static int add_ipu_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, struct bio **bio,
>  							struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	struct folio *fio_folio = fio->folio;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk = fio_folio->index + fio->idx;
> +	unsigned int fio_cnt = fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1;
>  	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = fio->sbi;
>  	enum temp_type temp;
>  	bool found = false;
> @@ -888,8 +895,10 @@ static int add_ipu_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, struct bio **bio,
>  							    fio->new_blkaddr));
>  			if (f2fs_crypt_mergeable_bio(*bio,
>  					fio_folio->mapping->host,
> -					fio_folio->index, fio) &&
> -			    bio_add_folio(*bio, folio, folio_size(folio), 0)) {
> +					fio_lblk, fio) &&
> +			    bio_add_folio(*bio, folio,
> +					F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt),
> +					fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT)) {
>  				ret = 0;
>  				break;
>  			}
> @@ -1003,6 +1012,7 @@ int f2fs_merge_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	struct folio *data_folio = fio->encrypted_page ?
>  			page_folio(fio->encrypted_page) : fio->folio;
>  	struct folio *folio = fio->folio;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk = folio->index + fio->idx;
>  
>  	if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(fio->sbi, fio->new_blkaddr,
>  			__is_meta_io(fio) ? META_GENERIC : DATA_GENERIC))
> @@ -1017,9 +1027,11 @@ int f2fs_merge_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	if (!bio) {
>  		bio = __bio_alloc(fio, BIO_MAX_VECS);
>  		f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx(bio, folio->mapping->host,
> -				folio->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> +				fio_lblk, fio, GFP_NOIO);
>  
> -		add_bio_entry(fio->sbi, bio, data_folio, fio->temp);
> +		add_bio_entry(fio->sbi, bio, data_folio,
> +				F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1),
> +				fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT, fio->temp);
>  	} else {
>  		if (add_ipu_page(fio, &bio, data_folio))
>  			goto alloc_new;
> @@ -1030,7 +1042,7 @@ int f2fs_merge_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  
>  	inc_page_count(fio->sbi, WB_DATA_TYPE(folio, false));
>  
> -	*fio->last_block = fio->new_blkaddr;
> +	*fio->last_block = fio->new_blkaddr + (fio->cnt ? fio->cnt - 1 : 0);
>  	*fio->bio = bio;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1066,6 +1078,10 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	struct folio *bio_folio;
>  	struct f2fs_lock_context lc;
>  	enum count_type type;
> +	pgoff_t fio_lblk;
> +	unsigned int fio_cnt;
> +	size_t bio_offset;
> +	size_t bio_len;
>  
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, is_read_io(fio->op));
>  
> @@ -1104,6 +1120,9 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	/* set submitted = true as a return value */
>  	fio->submitted = 1;
>  
> +	fio_lblk = fio->folio->index + fio->idx;
> +	fio_cnt = fio->cnt ? fio->cnt : 1;
> +
>  	type = WB_DATA_TYPE(bio_folio, fio->compressed_page);
>  	inc_page_count(sbi, type);
>  
> @@ -1111,26 +1130,29 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	    (!io_is_mergeable(sbi, io->bio, io, fio, io->last_block_in_bio,
>  			      fio->new_blkaddr) ||
>  	     !f2fs_crypt_mergeable_bio(io->bio, fio_inode(fio),
> -				bio_folio->index, fio)))
> +				fio_lblk, fio)))
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
>  alloc_new:
>  	if (io->bio == NULL) {
>  		io->bio = __bio_alloc(fio, BIO_MAX_VECS);
>  		f2fs_set_bio_crypt_ctx(io->bio, fio_inode(fio),
> -				bio_folio->index, fio, GFP_NOIO);
> +				fio_lblk, fio, GFP_NOIO);
>  		io->fio = *fio;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!bio_add_folio(io->bio, bio_folio, folio_size(bio_folio), 0)) {
> +	bio_offset = fio->idx << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	bio_len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt);
> +
> +	if (!bio_add_folio(io->bio, bio_folio, bio_len, bio_offset)) {
>  		__submit_merged_bio(io);
>  		goto alloc_new;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (fio->io_wbc)
>  		wbc_account_cgroup_owner(fio->io_wbc, fio->folio,
> -				folio_size(fio->folio));
> +				F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fio_cnt));

bio_len));

>  
> -	io->last_block_in_bio = fio->new_blkaddr;
> +	io->last_block_in_bio = fio->new_blkaddr + fio_cnt - 1;
>  
>  	trace_f2fs_submit_folio_write(fio->folio, fio);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> @@ -2992,7 +3014,7 @@ bool f2fs_should_update_outplace(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		return true;
>  
>  	if (fio) {
> -		if (page_private_gcing(fio->page))
> +		if (folio_test_f2fs_gcing(fio->folio))

Should this change belong to patch 1?

>  			return true;
>  		if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) &&
>  			f2fs_is_checkpointed_data(sbi, fio->old_blkaddr)))
> @@ -3031,7 +3053,7 @@ int f2fs_do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
>  
>  	if (need_inplace_update(fio) &&
> -	    f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, folio->index,
> +	    f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, folio->index + fio->idx,
>  						&fio->old_blkaddr)) {
>  		if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(fio->sbi, fio->old_blkaddr,
>  						DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))
> @@ -3050,7 +3072,7 @@ int f2fs_do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  	if (fio->need_lock == LOCK_REQ && !f2fs_trylock_op(fio->sbi, &lc))
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  
> -	err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, folio->index, LOOKUP_NODE);
> +	err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, folio->index + fio->idx, LOOKUP_NODE);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out;
>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index e4778c17394e..4c2902abe499 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1351,6 +1351,8 @@ struct f2fs_io_info {
>  	blk_opf_t op_flags;	/* req_flag_bits */
>  	block_t new_blkaddr;	/* new block address to be written */
>  	block_t old_blkaddr;	/* old block address before Cow */
> +	pgoff_t idx;		/* start block offset in the folio */

How about

pgoff_t folio_offset;		/* offset in large folio */

> +	unsigned int cnt;	/* block count in the folio */

unsigned int folio_blkcnt;	/* block count in large folio */

>  	union {
>  		struct page *page;	/* page to be written */
>  		struct folio *folio;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index d71ddb3ee918..43d41bb3b4b1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ static int __get_segment_type_6(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ALIGNED_WRITE))
>  			return CURSEG_COLD_DATA_PINNED;
>  
> -		if (page_private_gcing(fio->page)) {
> +		if (folio_test_f2fs_gcing(fio->folio)) {

Should this change belong to patch 1?

Thanks,

>  			if (fio->sbi->am.atgc_enabled &&
>  				(fio->io_type == FS_DATA_IO) &&
>  				(fio->sbi->gc_mode != GC_URGENT_HIGH) &&
> @@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ static int __get_segment_type_6(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		if (file_is_cold(inode) || f2fs_need_compress_data(inode))
>  			return CURSEG_COLD_DATA;
>  
> -		type = __get_age_segment_type(inode, fio->folio->index);
> +		type = __get_age_segment_type(inode, fio->folio->index + fio->idx);
>  		if (type != NO_CHECK_TYPE)
>  			return type;
>  



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22 16:08 [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08 ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-30  7:37   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-30  7:37     ` Chao Yu
2026-07-06  7:43     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-06  7:43       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-07-06  7:53       ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-06  7:53         ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-30  8:38   ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-06-30  8:38     ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-07-01  2:51 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Chao Yu
2026-07-01  2:51   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc4b29f0-8309-4a36-bdbe-b5f375aec31a@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
    --cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.