All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
	Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:37:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9b257fd-68ce-45a6-b4df-be5faf583e2d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622160830.324455-2-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 6/23/26 00:08, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Large folio write path needs a subpage status bitmap and write
> pages pending counter, while keeping compatible with f2fs private
> flags.
> 
> Move struct f2fs_folio_state to f2fs.h, add private_flags and
> subpage state bitmap, and change PAGE_PRIVATE functions to be
> compatible with f2fs_folio_state. Allocate f2fs_folio_state via kzalloc
> instead of kmem_cache, since the state size depends on the folio order.
> 
> Note: Now if a path wants to use f2fs_folio_state, it must call
> `folio_has_ffs` instead of `folio_test_large`` to make check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/compress.c |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/data.c     | 46 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h     | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> index 91855d91bbdd..de1305fcc6c1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ bool f2fs_is_compressed_page(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	if (!folio->private)
>  		return false;
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return false;
>  	if (folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))
>  		return false;

private is a pointer for compressed page, so it will be better to
check folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer() first, and then folio_has_ffs().

if (folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))
	return false;
if (folio_has_ffs(folio))
	return false;

>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index ac1cf4de3d62..23758c00758d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -32,20 +32,13 @@
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache *bio_post_read_ctx_cache;
>  static struct kmem_cache *bio_entry_slab;
> -static struct kmem_cache *ffs_entry_slab;
>  static mempool_t *bio_post_read_ctx_pool;
>  static struct bio_set f2fs_bioset;
>  
> -struct f2fs_folio_state {
> -	spinlock_t		state_lock;
> -	unsigned int		read_pages_pending;
> -};
> -
>  struct f2fs_bio {
>  	struct work_struct work;
>  	struct bio bio;
>  };
> -
>  #define	F2FS_BIO_POOL_SIZE	NR_CURSEG_TYPE
>  
>  int __init f2fs_init_bioset(void)
> @@ -2514,15 +2507,30 @@ int f2fs_read_multi_pages(struct compress_ctx *cc, struct bio **bio_ret,
>  
>  static struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs_find_or_alloc(struct folio *folio)
>  {
> -	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +	unsigned long private_flags = 0;
>  
> -	if (ffs)
> -		return ffs;
> +	f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_F_SB(folio), !folio_test_large(folio));
>  
> -	ffs = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(ffs_entry_slab,
> -			GFP_NOIO | __GFP_ZERO, true, NULL);
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +
> +	if (folio_test_private(folio) && folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))

Why this can happen? allocating large folio from other paths?

> +		private_flags = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +
> +	ffs = kzalloc(struct_size(ffs, state, BITS_TO_LONGS(2 * nr_subpages)),
> +			GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&ffs->state_lock);
> +	ffs->private_flags = private_flags;
> +	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> +		bitmap_set(ffs->state, 0, nr_subpages);
> +	if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
> +		bitmap_set(ffs->state, nr_subpages, nr_subpages);

Can you describe ffs->state layout in its definition?

> +
> +	if (folio_test_private(folio))
> +		folio_detach_private(folio);
>  	folio_attach_private(folio, ffs);
>  	return ffs;
>  }
> @@ -2531,7 +2539,7 @@ static void ffs_detach_free(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
>  
> -	if (!folio_test_large(folio)) {
> +	if (!folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
>  		folio_detach_private(folio);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -2541,7 +2549,8 @@ static void ffs_detach_free(struct folio *folio)
>  		return;
>  
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(ffs->read_pages_pending != 0);
> -	kmem_cache_free(ffs_entry_slab, ffs);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&ffs->write_pages_pending));
> +	kfree(ffs);
>  }
>  
>  static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> @@ -4571,21 +4580,12 @@ int __init f2fs_init_bio_entry_cache(void)
>  	if (!bio_entry_slab)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	ffs_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_ffs_slab",
> -			sizeof(struct f2fs_folio_state));
> -
> -	if (!ffs_entry_slab) {
> -		kmem_cache_destroy(bio_entry_slab);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void f2fs_destroy_bio_entry_cache(void)
>  {
>  	kmem_cache_destroy(bio_entry_slab);
> -	kmem_cache_destroy(ffs_entry_slab);
>  }
>  
>  static int f2fs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index f1774d4e18d2..e4778c17394e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1620,6 +1620,15 @@ static inline void f2fs_clear_bit(unsigned int nr, char *addr);
>   * Layout B: lowest bit should be 0
>   * page.private is a wrapped pointer.
>   */
> +
> +struct f2fs_folio_state {
> +	spinlock_t		state_lock;
> +	unsigned int		read_pages_pending;
> +	atomic_t		write_pages_pending;
> +	unsigned long		private_flags;
> +	unsigned long		state[];
> +};
> +
>  enum {
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER,		/* private contains non-pointer data */
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_ONGOING_MIGRATION,		/* data page which is on-going migrating */
> @@ -1629,6 +1638,14 @@ enum {
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_MAX
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool folio_has_ffs(const struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	unsigned long private = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +
> +	return folio_test_large(folio) && private &&
> +		!(private & BIT(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER));
> +}
> +
>  /* For compression */
>  enum compress_algorithm_type {
>  	COMPRESS_LZO,
> @@ -2638,9 +2655,15 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  #define PAGE_PRIVATE_GET_FUNC(name, flagname) \
>  static inline bool folio_test_f2fs_##name(const struct folio *folio)	\

Seems there are redundant codes below, let's have a try to wrap them w/ a macro for cleanup?

>  {									\
> -	unsigned long priv = (unsigned long)folio->private;		\
> +	unsigned long priv;						\
>  	unsigned long v = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) |		\
>  			     (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {					\
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;		\
> +		priv = ffs->private_flags;				\
> +	} else {							\
> +		priv = (unsigned long)folio->private;			\
> +	}								\
>  	return (priv & v) == v;						\
>  }									\
>  static inline bool page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
> @@ -2655,7 +2678,10 @@ static inline void folio_set_f2fs_##name(struct folio *folio)		\
>  {									\
>  	unsigned long v = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) |		\
>  			     (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
> -	if (!folio->private)						\
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {					\
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;		\
> +		ffs->private_flags |= v;				\
> +	} else if (!folio->private)					\
>  		folio_attach_private(folio, (void *)v);			\

Ditto?

>  	else {								\
>  		v |= (unsigned long)folio->private;			\
> @@ -2673,13 +2699,18 @@ static inline void set_page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
>  #define PAGE_PRIVATE_CLEAR_FUNC(name, flagname) \
>  static inline void folio_clear_f2fs_##name(struct folio *folio)		\
>  {									\
> -	unsigned long v = (unsigned long)folio->private;		\
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {					\
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;		\
> +		ffs->private_flags &= ~(1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname); \
> +	} else {							\
> +		unsigned long v = (unsigned long)folio->private;	\
>  									\
> -	v &= ~(1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);				\
> -	if (v == (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER))			\
> -		folio_detach_private(folio);				\
> -	else								\
> -		folio->private = (void *)v;				\
> +		v &= ~(1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
> +		if (v == (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER))	\
> +			folio_detach_private(folio);			\
> +		else							\
> +			folio->private = (void *)v;			\
> +	}								\
>  }									\
>  static inline void clear_page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
>  { \
> @@ -2705,7 +2736,15 @@ PAGE_PRIVATE_CLEAR_FUNC(atomic, ATOMIC_WRITE);
>  
>  static inline unsigned long folio_get_f2fs_data(struct folio *folio)
>  {
> -	unsigned long data = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +	unsigned long data;
> +
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +
> +		data = ffs->private_flags;
> +	} else {
> +		data = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +	}

Ditto?

>  
>  	if (!test_bit(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER, &data))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -2716,10 +2755,15 @@ static inline void folio_set_f2fs_data(struct folio *folio, unsigned long data)
>  {
>  	data = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) | (data << PAGE_PRIVATE_MAX);
>  
> -	if (!folio_test_private(folio))
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +
> +		ffs->private_flags |= data;
> +	} else if (!folio_test_private(folio)) {
>  		folio_attach_private(folio, (void *)data);

Ditto?

Thanks,

> -	else
> +	} else {
>  		folio->private = (void *)((unsigned long)folio->private | data);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: chao@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
	Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>, Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:37:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9b257fd-68ce-45a6-b4df-be5faf583e2d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622160830.324455-2-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 6/23/26 00:08, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Large folio write path needs a subpage status bitmap and write
> pages pending counter, while keeping compatible with f2fs private
> flags.
> 
> Move struct f2fs_folio_state to f2fs.h, add private_flags and
> subpage state bitmap, and change PAGE_PRIVATE functions to be
> compatible with f2fs_folio_state. Allocate f2fs_folio_state via kzalloc
> instead of kmem_cache, since the state size depends on the folio order.
> 
> Note: Now if a path wants to use f2fs_folio_state, it must call
> `folio_has_ffs` instead of `folio_test_large`` to make check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/compress.c |  2 ++
>  fs/f2fs/data.c     | 46 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h     | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> index 91855d91bbdd..de1305fcc6c1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ bool f2fs_is_compressed_page(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	if (!folio->private)
>  		return false;
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return false;
>  	if (folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))
>  		return false;

private is a pointer for compressed page, so it will be better to
check folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer() first, and then folio_has_ffs().

if (folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))
	return false;
if (folio_has_ffs(folio))
	return false;

>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index ac1cf4de3d62..23758c00758d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -32,20 +32,13 @@
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache *bio_post_read_ctx_cache;
>  static struct kmem_cache *bio_entry_slab;
> -static struct kmem_cache *ffs_entry_slab;
>  static mempool_t *bio_post_read_ctx_pool;
>  static struct bio_set f2fs_bioset;
>  
> -struct f2fs_folio_state {
> -	spinlock_t		state_lock;
> -	unsigned int		read_pages_pending;
> -};
> -
>  struct f2fs_bio {
>  	struct work_struct work;
>  	struct bio bio;
>  };
> -
>  #define	F2FS_BIO_POOL_SIZE	NR_CURSEG_TYPE
>  
>  int __init f2fs_init_bioset(void)
> @@ -2514,15 +2507,30 @@ int f2fs_read_multi_pages(struct compress_ctx *cc, struct bio **bio_ret,
>  
>  static struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs_find_or_alloc(struct folio *folio)
>  {
> -	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +	unsigned long private_flags = 0;
>  
> -	if (ffs)
> -		return ffs;
> +	f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_F_SB(folio), !folio_test_large(folio));
>  
> -	ffs = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(ffs_entry_slab,
> -			GFP_NOIO | __GFP_ZERO, true, NULL);
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +
> +	if (folio_test_private(folio) && folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))

Why this can happen? allocating large folio from other paths?

> +		private_flags = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +
> +	ffs = kzalloc(struct_size(ffs, state, BITS_TO_LONGS(2 * nr_subpages)),
> +			GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&ffs->state_lock);
> +	ffs->private_flags = private_flags;
> +	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> +		bitmap_set(ffs->state, 0, nr_subpages);
> +	if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
> +		bitmap_set(ffs->state, nr_subpages, nr_subpages);

Can you describe ffs->state layout in its definition?

> +
> +	if (folio_test_private(folio))
> +		folio_detach_private(folio);
>  	folio_attach_private(folio, ffs);
>  	return ffs;
>  }
> @@ -2531,7 +2539,7 @@ static void ffs_detach_free(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
>  
> -	if (!folio_test_large(folio)) {
> +	if (!folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
>  		folio_detach_private(folio);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -2541,7 +2549,8 @@ static void ffs_detach_free(struct folio *folio)
>  		return;
>  
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(ffs->read_pages_pending != 0);
> -	kmem_cache_free(ffs_entry_slab, ffs);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&ffs->write_pages_pending));
> +	kfree(ffs);
>  }
>  
>  static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> @@ -4571,21 +4580,12 @@ int __init f2fs_init_bio_entry_cache(void)
>  	if (!bio_entry_slab)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	ffs_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_ffs_slab",
> -			sizeof(struct f2fs_folio_state));
> -
> -	if (!ffs_entry_slab) {
> -		kmem_cache_destroy(bio_entry_slab);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void f2fs_destroy_bio_entry_cache(void)
>  {
>  	kmem_cache_destroy(bio_entry_slab);
> -	kmem_cache_destroy(ffs_entry_slab);
>  }
>  
>  static int f2fs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index f1774d4e18d2..e4778c17394e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1620,6 +1620,15 @@ static inline void f2fs_clear_bit(unsigned int nr, char *addr);
>   * Layout B: lowest bit should be 0
>   * page.private is a wrapped pointer.
>   */
> +
> +struct f2fs_folio_state {
> +	spinlock_t		state_lock;
> +	unsigned int		read_pages_pending;
> +	atomic_t		write_pages_pending;
> +	unsigned long		private_flags;
> +	unsigned long		state[];
> +};
> +
>  enum {
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER,		/* private contains non-pointer data */
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_ONGOING_MIGRATION,		/* data page which is on-going migrating */
> @@ -1629,6 +1638,14 @@ enum {
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_MAX
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool folio_has_ffs(const struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	unsigned long private = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +
> +	return folio_test_large(folio) && private &&
> +		!(private & BIT(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER));
> +}
> +
>  /* For compression */
>  enum compress_algorithm_type {
>  	COMPRESS_LZO,
> @@ -2638,9 +2655,15 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  #define PAGE_PRIVATE_GET_FUNC(name, flagname) \
>  static inline bool folio_test_f2fs_##name(const struct folio *folio)	\

Seems there are redundant codes below, let's have a try to wrap them w/ a macro for cleanup?

>  {									\
> -	unsigned long priv = (unsigned long)folio->private;		\
> +	unsigned long priv;						\
>  	unsigned long v = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) |		\
>  			     (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {					\
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;		\
> +		priv = ffs->private_flags;				\
> +	} else {							\
> +		priv = (unsigned long)folio->private;			\
> +	}								\
>  	return (priv & v) == v;						\
>  }									\
>  static inline bool page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
> @@ -2655,7 +2678,10 @@ static inline void folio_set_f2fs_##name(struct folio *folio)		\
>  {									\
>  	unsigned long v = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) |		\
>  			     (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
> -	if (!folio->private)						\
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {					\
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;		\
> +		ffs->private_flags |= v;				\
> +	} else if (!folio->private)					\
>  		folio_attach_private(folio, (void *)v);			\

Ditto?

>  	else {								\
>  		v |= (unsigned long)folio->private;			\
> @@ -2673,13 +2699,18 @@ static inline void set_page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
>  #define PAGE_PRIVATE_CLEAR_FUNC(name, flagname) \
>  static inline void folio_clear_f2fs_##name(struct folio *folio)		\
>  {									\
> -	unsigned long v = (unsigned long)folio->private;		\
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {					\
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;		\
> +		ffs->private_flags &= ~(1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname); \
> +	} else {							\
> +		unsigned long v = (unsigned long)folio->private;	\
>  									\
> -	v &= ~(1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);				\
> -	if (v == (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER))			\
> -		folio_detach_private(folio);				\
> -	else								\
> -		folio->private = (void *)v;				\
> +		v &= ~(1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
> +		if (v == (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER))	\
> +			folio_detach_private(folio);			\
> +		else							\
> +			folio->private = (void *)v;			\
> +	}								\
>  }									\
>  static inline void clear_page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
>  { \
> @@ -2705,7 +2736,15 @@ PAGE_PRIVATE_CLEAR_FUNC(atomic, ATOMIC_WRITE);
>  
>  static inline unsigned long folio_get_f2fs_data(struct folio *folio)
>  {
> -	unsigned long data = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +	unsigned long data;
> +
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +
> +		data = ffs->private_flags;
> +	} else {
> +		data = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +	}

Ditto?

>  
>  	if (!test_bit(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER, &data))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -2716,10 +2755,15 @@ static inline void folio_set_f2fs_data(struct folio *folio, unsigned long data)
>  {
>  	data = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) | (data << PAGE_PRIVATE_MAX);
>  
> -	if (!folio_test_private(folio))
> +	if (folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +
> +		ffs->private_flags |= data;
> +	} else if (!folio_test_private(folio)) {
>  		folio_attach_private(folio, (void *)data);

Ditto?

Thanks,

> -	else
> +	} else {
>  		folio->private = (void *)((unsigned long)folio->private | data);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22 16:08 [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08 ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-30  7:37   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-06-30  7:37     ` Chao Yu
2026-07-06  7:43     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-06  7:43       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-07-06  7:53       ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-07-06  7:53         ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-30  8:38   ` Chao Yu
2026-06-30  8:38     ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-06-22 16:08 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-22 16:08   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-07-01  2:51 ` [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Chao Yu
2026-07-01  2:51   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a9b257fd-68ce-45a6-b4df-be5faf583e2d@kernel.org \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
    --cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.