From: Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <pradeepc@codeaurora.org>
To: Karthikeyan periyasamy <periyasa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
pradeepc=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/3] ath11k: switch to using ieee80211_tx_status_ext()
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 05:56:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c369ab155fe070ffc9c129662a3e71c8@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <183cd636909cec0b8d20da8515c146ab@codeaurora.org>
On 2021-03-18 22:31, Karthikeyan periyasamy wrote:
>> - ieee80211_tx_status(ar->hw, msdu);
>> + spin_lock_bh(&ab->base_lock);
>> + peer = ath11k_peer_find_by_id(ab, ts->peer_id);
>> + if (peer) {
>> + arsta = (struct ath11k_sta *)peer->sta->drv_priv;
>> + status.sta = peer->sta;
>> + status.skb = msdu;
>> + status.info = info;
>> + status.rate = &arsta->last_txrate;
>
> Assigning arsta holded last_txrate pointer to status.rate create race
> condition problem b/w sta delete and ieee80211_tx_status_ext, no ?
> Hw we ensure that arsta pointer is valid until
> ieee80211_tx_status_ext() processing?
>
> Instead why don't we have local struct rate_info and assign like below
> code snippet
>
> struct rate_info rate;
> ...
> rate = arsta->last_txrate;
> status.rate = &rate;
>
> Thanks,
> Karthikeyan P
Thanks Karthikeyan, I have addressed this in V9..
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <pradeepc@codeaurora.org>
To: Karthikeyan periyasamy <periyasa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
pradeepc=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/3] ath11k: switch to using ieee80211_tx_status_ext()
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 05:56:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c369ab155fe070ffc9c129662a3e71c8@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <183cd636909cec0b8d20da8515c146ab@codeaurora.org>
On 2021-03-18 22:31, Karthikeyan periyasamy wrote:
>> - ieee80211_tx_status(ar->hw, msdu);
>> + spin_lock_bh(&ab->base_lock);
>> + peer = ath11k_peer_find_by_id(ab, ts->peer_id);
>> + if (peer) {
>> + arsta = (struct ath11k_sta *)peer->sta->drv_priv;
>> + status.sta = peer->sta;
>> + status.skb = msdu;
>> + status.info = info;
>> + status.rate = &arsta->last_txrate;
>
> Assigning arsta holded last_txrate pointer to status.rate create race
> condition problem b/w sta delete and ieee80211_tx_status_ext, no ?
> Hw we ensure that arsta pointer is valid until
> ieee80211_tx_status_ext() processing?
>
> Instead why don't we have local struct rate_info and assign like below
> code snippet
>
> struct rate_info rate;
> ...
> rate = arsta->last_txrate;
> status.rate = &rate;
>
> Thanks,
> Karthikeyan P
Thanks Karthikeyan, I have addressed this in V9..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-04 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 22:09 [PATCH V8 0/3] ath11k: add HE radiotap header support Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-18 22:09 ` Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-18 22:09 ` [PATCH V8 1/3] ath11k: switch to using ieee80211_tx_status_ext() Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-18 22:09 ` Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-19 5:31 ` Karthikeyan periyasamy
2021-03-19 5:31 ` Karthikeyan periyasamy
2021-04-04 12:56 ` Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu [this message]
2021-04-04 12:56 ` Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-18 22:09 ` [PATCH V8 2/3] ath11k: decode HE status tlv Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-18 22:09 ` Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-18 22:09 ` [PATCH V8 3/3] ath11k: translate HE status to radiotap format Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2021-03-18 22:09 ` Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c369ab155fe070ffc9c129662a3e71c8@codeaurora.org \
--to=pradeepc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=periyasa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pradeepc=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.