* Re: [PATCH] t/io_uring: fix error handling for setup_ring
2023-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH] t/io_uring: fix error handling for setup_ring Anuj Gupta
@ 2023-04-27 11:48 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-27 11:53 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2023-04-27 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anuj Gupta; +Cc: vincent.fu, fio, ankit.kumar, anuj1072538
On 4/27/23 9:10 AM, Anuj Gupta wrote:
> s->sq_ring.ring_entries and s->cq_ring.ring_entries will be NULL,
> incase setup_ring fails. This will cause a segmentation fault.
>
> In case setup_ring fails, bail out by setting finish.
Any reason why we don't just use the return code of submitter_init()
on whether to abort or not?
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] t/io_uring: fix error handling for setup_ring
2023-04-27 11:48 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2023-04-27 11:53 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-27 12:26 ` Anuj gupta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2023-04-27 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anuj Gupta; +Cc: vincent.fu, fio, ankit.kumar, anuj1072538
On 4/27/23 5:48?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/27/23 9:10?AM, Anuj Gupta wrote:
>> s->sq_ring.ring_entries and s->cq_ring.ring_entries will be NULL,
>> incase setup_ring fails. This will cause a segmentation fault.
>>
>> In case setup_ring fails, bail out by setting finish.
>
> Any reason why we don't just use the return code of submitter_init()
> on whether to abort or not?
Something like this as a prep patch, then do the trivial version
of your patch after that.
Totally untested...
diff --git a/t/io_uring.c b/t/io_uring.c
index 6b0efef85cb7..2f8d63fbe67e 100644
--- a/t/io_uring.c
+++ b/t/io_uring.c
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter *s)
buf = allocate_mem(s, bs);
if (!buf)
- return 1;
+ return -1;
s->iovecs[i].iov_base = buf;
s->iovecs[i].iov_len = bs;
}
@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter *s)
}
if (err) {
printf("queue setup failed: %s, %d\n", strerror(errno), err);
- return 1;
+ return -1;
}
if (!init_printed) {
@@ -1172,9 +1172,15 @@ static void *submitter_aio_fn(void *data)
struct iocb *iocbs;
struct io_event *events;
#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
- int nr_batch = submitter_init(s);
-#else
- submitter_init(s);
+ int nr_batch;
+#endif
+
+ ret = submitter_init(s);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto done;
+
+#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
+ nr_batch = ret;
#endif
iocbsptr = calloc(depth, sizeof(struct iocb *));
@@ -1238,6 +1244,7 @@ static void *submitter_aio_fn(void *data)
free(iocbsptr);
free(iocbs);
free(events);
+done:
finish = 1;
return NULL;
}
@@ -1277,9 +1284,15 @@ static void *submitter_uring_fn(void *data)
struct io_sq_ring *ring = &s->sq_ring;
int ret, prepped;
#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
- int nr_batch = submitter_init(s);
-#else
- submitter_init(s);
+ int nr_batch;
+#endif
+
+ ret = submitter_init(s);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto done;
+
+#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
+ nr_batch = ret;
#endif
if (register_ring)
@@ -1383,6 +1396,7 @@ submit:
if (register_ring)
io_uring_unregister_ring(s);
+done:
finish = 1;
return NULL;
}
@@ -1393,7 +1407,8 @@ static void *submitter_sync_fn(void *data)
struct submitter *s = data;
int ret;
- submitter_init(s);
+ if (submitter_init(s) < 0)
+ goto done;
do {
uint64_t offset;
@@ -1429,6 +1444,7 @@ static void *submitter_sync_fn(void *data)
add_stat(s, s->clock_index, 1);
} while (!s->finish);
+done:
finish = 1;
return NULL;
}
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] t/io_uring: fix error handling for setup_ring
2023-04-27 11:53 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2023-04-27 12:26 ` Anuj gupta
2023-04-27 13:22 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anuj gupta @ 2023-04-27 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Anuj Gupta, vincent.fu, fio, ankit.kumar
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 5:23 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 4/27/23 5:48?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 4/27/23 9:10?AM, Anuj Gupta wrote:
> >> s->sq_ring.ring_entries and s->cq_ring.ring_entries will be NULL,
> >> incase setup_ring fails. This will cause a segmentation fault.
> >>
> >> In case setup_ring fails, bail out by setting finish.
> >
> > Any reason why we don't just use the return code of submitter_init()
> > on whether to abort or not?
>
> Something like this as a prep patch, then do the trivial version
> of your patch after that.
>
> Totally untested...
>
>
> diff --git a/t/io_uring.c b/t/io_uring.c
> index 6b0efef85cb7..2f8d63fbe67e 100644
> --- a/t/io_uring.c
> +++ b/t/io_uring.c
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter *s)
>
> buf = allocate_mem(s, bs);
> if (!buf)
> - return 1;
> + return -1;
> s->iovecs[i].iov_base = buf;
> s->iovecs[i].iov_len = bs;
> }
> @@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter *s)
> }
> if (err) {
> printf("queue setup failed: %s, %d\n", strerror(errno), err);
> - return 1;
> + return -1;
> }
>
> if (!init_printed) {
> @@ -1172,9 +1172,15 @@ static void *submitter_aio_fn(void *data)
> struct iocb *iocbs;
> struct io_event *events;
> #ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
> - int nr_batch = submitter_init(s);
> -#else
> - submitter_init(s);
> + int nr_batch;
> +#endif
> +
> + ret = submitter_init(s);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto done;
> +
> +#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
> + nr_batch = ret;
> #endif
>
> iocbsptr = calloc(depth, sizeof(struct iocb *));
> @@ -1238,6 +1244,7 @@ static void *submitter_aio_fn(void *data)
> free(iocbsptr);
> free(iocbs);
> free(events);
> +done:
> finish = 1;
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -1277,9 +1284,15 @@ static void *submitter_uring_fn(void *data)
> struct io_sq_ring *ring = &s->sq_ring;
> int ret, prepped;
> #ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
> - int nr_batch = submitter_init(s);
> -#else
> - submitter_init(s);
> + int nr_batch;
> +#endif
> +
> + ret = submitter_init(s);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto done;
> +
> +#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
> + nr_batch = ret;
> #endif
>
> if (register_ring)
> @@ -1383,6 +1396,7 @@ submit:
> if (register_ring)
> io_uring_unregister_ring(s);
>
> +done:
> finish = 1;
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -1393,7 +1407,8 @@ static void *submitter_sync_fn(void *data)
> struct submitter *s = data;
> int ret;
>
> - submitter_init(s);
> + if (submitter_init(s) < 0)
> + goto done;
>
> do {
> uint64_t offset;
> @@ -1429,6 +1444,7 @@ static void *submitter_sync_fn(void *data)
> add_stat(s, s->clock_index, 1);
> } while (!s->finish);
>
> +done:
> finish = 1;
> return NULL;
> }
>
Tested this and the patch works out fine. This can go on top of this
to avoid access to NULL pointer -
--- a/t/io_uring.c
+++ b/t/io_uring.c
@@ -1059,7 +1059,8 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter s)
err = 0;
} else if (!aio) {
err = setup_ring(s);
- sprintf(buf, "Engine=io_uring, sq_ring=%d,
cq_ring=%d\n",s->sq_ring.ring_entries, s->cq_ring.ring_entries);
+ if (!err)
+ sprintf(buf, "Engine=io_uring, sq_ring=%d,
cq_ring=%d\n",s->sq_ring.ring_entries, *s->cq_ring.ring_entries);
} else {
sprintf(buf, "Engine=aio\n");
err = setup_aio(s);
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
--
Anuj Gupta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] t/io_uring: fix error handling for setup_ring
2023-04-27 12:26 ` Anuj gupta
@ 2023-04-27 13:22 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2023-04-27 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anuj gupta; +Cc: Anuj Gupta, vincent.fu, fio, ankit.kumar
On 4/27/23 6:26?AM, Anuj gupta wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 5:23?PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/27/23 5:48?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 4/27/23 9:10?AM, Anuj Gupta wrote:
>>>> s->sq_ring.ring_entries and s->cq_ring.ring_entries will be NULL,
>>>> incase setup_ring fails. This will cause a segmentation fault.
>>>>
>>>> In case setup_ring fails, bail out by setting finish.
>>>
>>> Any reason why we don't just use the return code of submitter_init()
>>> on whether to abort or not?
>>
>> Something like this as a prep patch, then do the trivial version
>> of your patch after that.
>>
>> Totally untested...
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/t/io_uring.c b/t/io_uring.c
>> index 6b0efef85cb7..2f8d63fbe67e 100644
>> --- a/t/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/t/io_uring.c
>> @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter *s)
>>
>> buf = allocate_mem(s, bs);
>> if (!buf)
>> - return 1;
>> + return -1;
>> s->iovecs[i].iov_base = buf;
>> s->iovecs[i].iov_len = bs;
>> }
>> @@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter *s)
>> }
>> if (err) {
>> printf("queue setup failed: %s, %d\n", strerror(errno), err);
>> - return 1;
>> + return -1;
>> }
>>
>> if (!init_printed) {
>> @@ -1172,9 +1172,15 @@ static void *submitter_aio_fn(void *data)
>> struct iocb *iocbs;
>> struct io_event *events;
>> #ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
>> - int nr_batch = submitter_init(s);
>> -#else
>> - submitter_init(s);
>> + int nr_batch;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + ret = submitter_init(s);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> +#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
>> + nr_batch = ret;
>> #endif
>>
>> iocbsptr = calloc(depth, sizeof(struct iocb *));
>> @@ -1238,6 +1244,7 @@ static void *submitter_aio_fn(void *data)
>> free(iocbsptr);
>> free(iocbs);
>> free(events);
>> +done:
>> finish = 1;
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> @@ -1277,9 +1284,15 @@ static void *submitter_uring_fn(void *data)
>> struct io_sq_ring *ring = &s->sq_ring;
>> int ret, prepped;
>> #ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
>> - int nr_batch = submitter_init(s);
>> -#else
>> - submitter_init(s);
>> + int nr_batch;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + ret = submitter_init(s);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> +#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_CPU_CLOCK
>> + nr_batch = ret;
>> #endif
>>
>> if (register_ring)
>> @@ -1383,6 +1396,7 @@ submit:
>> if (register_ring)
>> io_uring_unregister_ring(s);
>>
>> +done:
>> finish = 1;
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> @@ -1393,7 +1407,8 @@ static void *submitter_sync_fn(void *data)
>> struct submitter *s = data;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - submitter_init(s);
>> + if (submitter_init(s) < 0)
>> + goto done;
>>
>> do {
>> uint64_t offset;
>> @@ -1429,6 +1444,7 @@ static void *submitter_sync_fn(void *data)
>> add_stat(s, s->clock_index, 1);
>> } while (!s->finish);
>>
>> +done:
>> finish = 1;
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>
> Tested this and the patch works out fine. This can go on top of this
> to avoid access to NULL pointer -
Thanks! Can you send this one as a real patch to make my life just a
tiny bit easier?
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] t/io_uring: fix error handling for setup_ring
[not found] <CGME20230427094952epcas5p32967ed548e18e60ea3134a03aa046bb8@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
@ 2023-04-27 15:10 ` Anuj Gupta
2023-04-27 11:48 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anuj Gupta @ 2023-04-27 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: vincent.fu, fio, ankit.kumar, anuj1072538, Anuj Gupta
s->sq_ring.ring_entries and s->cq_ring.ring_entries will be NULL,
incase setup_ring fails. This will cause a segmentation fault.
In case setup_ring fails, bail out by setting finish.
Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>
---
t/io_uring.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/io_uring.c b/t/io_uring.c
index 6b0efef8..e00f278d 100644
--- a/t/io_uring.c
+++ b/t/io_uring.c
@@ -1059,12 +1059,14 @@ static int submitter_init(struct submitter *s)
err = 0;
} else if (!aio) {
err = setup_ring(s);
- sprintf(buf, "Engine=io_uring, sq_ring=%d, cq_ring=%d\n", *s->sq_ring.ring_entries, *s->cq_ring.ring_entries);
+ if (!err)
+ sprintf(buf, "Engine=io_uring, sq_ring=%d, cq_ring=%d\n", *s->sq_ring.ring_entries, *s->cq_ring.ring_entries);
} else {
sprintf(buf, "Engine=aio\n");
err = setup_aio(s);
}
if (err) {
+ finish = 1;
printf("queue setup failed: %s, %d\n", strerror(errno), err);
return 1;
}
@@ -1282,6 +1284,9 @@ static void *submitter_uring_fn(void *data)
submitter_init(s);
#endif
+ if (finish)
+ return NULL;
+
if (register_ring)
io_uring_register_ring(s);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-27 13:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20230427094952epcas5p32967ed548e18e60ea3134a03aa046bb8@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2023-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH] t/io_uring: fix error handling for setup_ring Anuj Gupta
2023-04-27 11:48 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-27 11:53 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-27 12:26 ` Anuj gupta
2023-04-27 13:22 ` Jens Axboe
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.