All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@linuxcare.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Gérard Roudier <groudier@club-internet.fr>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Donald Becker <becker@scyld.com>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] starfire reads irq before pci_enable_device.
Date: 14 Feb 2001 16:39:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3ofw55l50.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010213070337.31857F-100000@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>
In-Reply-To: Jeff Garzik's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:06:44 -0600 (CST)"

>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com> writes:

Jeff> On 12 Feb 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> 3) The acenic/gbit performance anomalies have been cured by
>> reverting the PCI mem_inval tweaks.

Jeff> Just to be clear, acenic should or should not use MWI?

Jeff> And can a general rule be applied here?  Newer Tulip hardware
Jeff> also has the ability to enable/disable MWI usage, IIRC.

AceNIC always used to do this until the ZC patches appeared. It's a
recommendation from the hardware designers so I figure it's a bug in
the AceNIC hardware. I can probably go dig up the details on this, but
it's hidden somewhere deep down, ie. it's been ages since I looked at
it last.

Jes

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-02-14 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-07 19:52 [PATCH] starfire reads irq before pci_enable_device davej
2001-02-07 19:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-07 20:34   ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-08  4:00     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-08  1:52   ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-08 20:28     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-08 21:18       ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-08 21:38         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-08 22:05           ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09 19:08             ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-09 20:07               ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09 20:11                 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-09 20:21                   ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09 20:26                     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-08 21:43         ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-08 21:46           ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09 21:43           ` Jes Sorensen
2001-02-09 21:52             ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-12 18:54               ` Jes Sorensen
2001-02-14  1:35                 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-10 14:48             ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-08 21:26       ` Donald Becker
2001-02-08 22:16         ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09  0:09           ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09  0:44           ` Donald Becker
2001-02-09  0:47             ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09 10:49             ` Alan Cox
2001-02-09 23:32               ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-09 23:35                 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-10  8:48                   ` Gérard Roudier
2001-02-12 19:01                     ` Jes Sorensen
2001-02-13 13:06                       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-13 20:29                         ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-14  2:05                           ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-14 20:10                             ` Gérard Roudier
2001-02-14 15:39                         ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2001-02-17 21:34                         ` David S. Miller
2001-02-19 11:00                           ` Jes Sorensen
2001-02-09 21:42       ` Jes Sorensen
2001-02-09 22:56         ` Donald Becker
2001-02-12 18:54           ` Jes Sorensen
2001-02-14  1:20             ` Donald Becker
2001-02-14 12:37               ` Alan Cox
2001-02-14 12:49                 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-14 12:54                   ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-14 13:05                     ` Alan Cox
2001-02-14 13:38                       ` Ion Badulescu
2001-02-14 15:35               ` Jes Sorensen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-14 16:54 Petr Vandrovec
2001-02-15 16:09 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-02-07 18:42 davej

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3ofw55l50.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch \
    --to=jes@linuxcare.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=becker@scyld.com \
    --cc=groudier@club-internet.fr \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.