From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Arsenii Pashchenko <ulijg308@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rtw-next v7 2/3] wifi: rtw88: rtw8822c: Convert DAC IQ calibration path to signed math
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:29:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d662dcab866042c08f050cfe035c7c70@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86bde9882c56a1245a4c903b607e23d551dde1b9.1787895379.git.ulijg308@gmail.com>
Arsenii Pashchenko <ulijg308@gmail.com> wrote:
> Convert the temporary stack arrays 'iv' and 'qv' from u32 to s32.
> Update all internal function signatures to accept s32 pointers and
> handle signed values natively.
>
> Use sign_extend32() combined with FIELD_GET_SIGNED() to properly interpret
> the 10-bit hardware values as signed integers. This allows flattening
> the complex nested unsigned boundary conditions in
> rtw8822c_dac_iq_check() into a simple amplitude boundary check. Ensure
> rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset() properly maps the signed average back to a
> 10-bit unsigned format expected by the hardware registers via GENMASK().
>
> Signed-off-by: Arsenii Pashchenko <ulijg308@gmail.com>
[...]
> -static void rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 *vec, u32 *val)
> +static u32 rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, s32 *vec)
> {
> - u32 p, m, t, i;
> + s32 sum = 0;
> + s32 avg;
> + u32 i;
>
> - m = 0;
> - p = 0;
> - for (i = 10; i < DACK_SN_8822C - 10; i++) {
> - if (vec[i] > 0x200)
> - m = (0x400 - vec[i]) + m;
> - else
> - p = vec[i] + p;
> - }
> + for (i = 10; i < DACK_SN_8822C - 10; i++)
> + sum += vec[i];
>
> - if (p > m) {
> - t = p - m;
> - t = t / (DACK_SN_8822C - 20);
> - } else {
> - t = m - p;
> - t = t / (DACK_SN_8822C - 20);
> - if (t != 0x0)
> - t = 0x400 - t;
> - }
> + avg = sum / (DACK_SN_8822C - 20);
>
> - *val = t;
> + /* Map the signed average back to a 10-bit hardware format.
> + * Example: avg = -1, returns 0x3FF (signed 10-bit value)
> + */
The first line of comment block should be empty, like
/*
* comment start here.
* second.
*/
> + return avg & GENMASK(9, 0);
> }
>
> static u32 rtw8822c_get_path_write_addr(u8 path)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 5:40 [PATCH rtw-next v7 0/3] wifi: rtw88: rtw8822c: refactor DAC IQ calibration to s32 Arsenii Pashchenko
2026-08-28 5:40 ` [PATCH rtw-next v7 1/3] wifi: rtw88: rtw8822c: Use bitfield macros for DAC IQ sampling Arsenii Pashchenko
2026-08-28 8:23 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-08-28 5:40 ` [PATCH rtw-next v7 2/3] wifi: rtw88: rtw8822c: Convert DAC IQ calibration path to signed math Arsenii Pashchenko
2026-08-28 8:29 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-08-28 5:40 ` [PATCH rtw-next v7 3/3] wifi: rtw88: rtw8822c: Replace custom DAC IQ sorting with kernel sort Arsenii Pashchenko
2026-08-28 8:24 ` Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d662dcab866042c08f050cfe035c7c70@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulijg308@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.