o32 glibc-2.3.5

o32 glibc-2.3.5

[David Cummings]

hi, 
  Trying to compile glibc-2.3.5 for o32 patched with syscall, I get an
error for socket.S, socket/recv.o. This is the exact same error
mentioned on this list last month. In that thread there was reference
to a patch by Richard sandiford. This is with gcc-3.4.4. If anyone
knows where I can find said patch, and if that'll fix my problem, I'd
greatly appreciate it. I've been looking in glibc's bugzilla but can't
find the right bug. Thanks!
-Dave
-- 
The way that can be named is not the Way.

Re: o32 glibc-2.3.5

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, David Cummings wrote:

> greatly appreciate it. I've been looking in glibc's bugzilla but can't
> find the right bug. Thanks!

 #758

  Maciej

Re: o32 glibc-2.3.5

[David Cummings]

On 7/27/05, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, David Cummings wrote:
> 
> > greatly appreciate it. I've been looking in glibc's bugzilla but can't
> > find the right bug. Thanks!
> 
>  #758
> 
>   Maciej
> 
Alright, thanks. I had found that, but it didn't seem to apply to the
problem with socket, as that had already been applied when the socket
happened. I'm also now having a problem with n32 which is similar if
not the same as the one Rolf had not too long ago. Something about a
__fork_block not being found. Anyplace else I should look? Thanks,
-Dave

-- 
The way that can be named is not the Way.

Re: o32 glibc-2.3.5

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, David Cummings wrote:

> Alright, thanks. I had found that, but it didn't seem to apply to the
> problem with socket, as that had already been applied when the socket
> happened. I'm also now having a problem with n32 which is similar if

 socket.S shouldn't be needed as recv.o is expected to be built as a stub 
based on syscalls.list.  Have you regenerated the configure script 
corresponding to the changed configure.in template?

> not the same as the one Rolf had not too long ago. Something about a
> __fork_block not being found. Anyplace else I should look? Thanks,

 Check if the symbol is defined where it's expected to.

 Source and binary RPM packages of glibc 2.3.5 built for o32 and (n)64 are 
available at my site; built with GCC 4.0.0 which is even pickier than 
3.4.4.  Availability of binary packages means successful builds are 
possibile.  Figuring out how is left as an exercise for the reader; source 
packages are provided as an aid to that.

  Maciej