All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@au1.ibm.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: make processing of movable_node arch-specific
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:15:40 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcfc8ace-e59e-6b4b-0f2f-4eff9f08f3c1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <235f2d20-cf84-08df-1fb4-08ee258fdc52@gmail.com>



On 11/10/16 23:26, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/10/16 05:36, Reza Arbab wrote:
>> Currently, CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE depends on X86_64. In preparation to
>> enable it for other arches, we need to factor a detail which is unique
>> to x86 out of the generic mm code.
>>
>> Specifically, as documented in kernel-parameters.txt, the use of
>> "movable_node" should remain restricted to x86:
>>
>> movable_node    [KNL,X86] Boot-time switch to enable the effects
>>                 of CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE=y. See mm/Kconfig for details.
>>
>> This option tells x86 to find movable nodes identified by the ACPI SRAT.
>> On other arches, it would have no benefit, only the undesired side
>> effect of setting bottom-up memblock allocation.
>>
>> Since #ifdef CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE will no longer be enough to restrict
>> this option to x86, move it to an arch-specific compilation unit
>> instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
> 

After the ack, I realized there were some more checks needed, IOW
questions for you :)

1. Have you checked to see if our memblock allocations spill
over to probably hotpluggable nodes?
2. Shouldn't we be marking nodes discovered as movable via
memblock_mark_hotplug()?

Balbir Singh.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@au1.ibm.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: make processing of movable_node arch-specific
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:15:40 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcfc8ace-e59e-6b4b-0f2f-4eff9f08f3c1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <235f2d20-cf84-08df-1fb4-08ee258fdc52@gmail.com>



On 11/10/16 23:26, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/10/16 05:36, Reza Arbab wrote:
>> Currently, CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE depends on X86_64. In preparation to
>> enable it for other arches, we need to factor a detail which is unique
>> to x86 out of the generic mm code.
>>
>> Specifically, as documented in kernel-parameters.txt, the use of
>> "movable_node" should remain restricted to x86:
>>
>> movable_node    [KNL,X86] Boot-time switch to enable the effects
>>                 of CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE=y. See mm/Kconfig for details.
>>
>> This option tells x86 to find movable nodes identified by the ACPI SRAT.
>> On other arches, it would have no benefit, only the undesired side
>> effect of setting bottom-up memblock allocation.
>>
>> Since #ifdef CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE will no longer be enough to restrict
>> this option to x86, move it to an arch-specific compilation unit
>> instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
> 

After the ack, I realized there were some more checks needed, IOW
questions for you :)

1. Have you checked to see if our memblock allocations spill
over to probably hotpluggable nodes?
2. Shouldn't we be marking nodes discovered as movable via
memblock_mark_hotplug()?

Balbir Singh.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-25 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-06 18:36 [PATCH v4 0/5] powerpc/mm: movable hotplug memory nodes Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36 ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] drivers/of: introduce of_fdt_device_is_available() Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36   ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] drivers/of: do not add memory for unavailable nodes Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36   ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-11 13:58   ` Rob Herring
2016-10-11 13:58     ` Rob Herring
2016-10-21  6:22   ` Alistair Popple
2016-10-21  6:22     ` Alistair Popple
2016-10-23  1:51     ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-23  1:51       ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-24 10:24     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-10-24 10:24       ` Michael Ellerman
2016-10-24 18:20       ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-24 18:20         ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-24 18:20         ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] powerpc/mm: allow memory hotplug into a memoryless node Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36   ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-20  3:30   ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-20  3:30     ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-20  3:30     ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-20 14:38     ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-20 14:38       ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-20 14:38       ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-25  9:39     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-10-25  9:39       ` Michael Ellerman
2016-10-06 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: make processing of movable_node arch-specific Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36   ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36   ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-07  6:37   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-07  6:37     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-07  6:37     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-11 12:26   ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-11 12:26     ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-25 12:15     ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2016-10-25 12:15       ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-25 15:55       ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-25 15:55         ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-25 22:34         ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-25 22:34           ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-26  0:49           ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-26  0:49             ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-26 10:52             ` Michael Ellerman
2016-10-26 10:52               ` Michael Ellerman
2016-10-26 17:03               ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-26 17:03                 ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-25 22:59         ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-25 22:59           ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-06 18:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm: enable CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE on non-x86 arches Reza Arbab
2016-10-06 18:36   ` Reza Arbab
2016-10-07  6:40   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-07  6:40     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-11 13:17   ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-11 13:17     ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dcfc8ace-e59e-6b4b-0f2f-4eff9f08f3c1@gmail.com \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=apopple@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.