All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915: Pull the context->pin_count dec into the common intel_context_unpin
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 11:20:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e637c1be-2ffa-3c77-a1b0-ecc8c83dbedd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180517074055.14638-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 17/05/2018 08:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
> As all backends implement the same pin_count mechanism and do a
> dec-and-test as their first step, pull that into the common
> intel_context_unpin(). This also pulls into the caller, eliminating the
> indirect call in the usual steady state case. The intel_context_pin()
> side is a little more complicated as it combines the lookup/alloc as
> well as pinning the state, and so is left for a later date.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h      |  4 ++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c             | 13 +------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c      |  6 ------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c |  3 ---
>   4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
> index 749a4ff566f5..c3262b4dd2ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
> @@ -285,6 +285,10 @@ static inline void __intel_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   static inline void intel_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count);
> +	if (--ce->pin_count)
> +		return;
> +
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->ops);
>   	ce->ops->unpin(ce);
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 960948617748..f3470b95d64e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static void execlists_context_destroy(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	__i915_gem_object_release_unless_active(ce->state->obj);
>   }
>   
> -static void __execlists_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> +static void execlists_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
>   	intel_ring_unpin(ce->ring);
>   
> @@ -1355,17 +1355,6 @@ static void __execlists_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	i915_gem_context_put(ce->gem_context);
>   }
>   
> -static void execlists_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->gem_context->i915->drm.struct_mutex);

Do you want to preserve these asserts?

> -	GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count == 0);
> -
> -	if (--ce->pin_count)
> -		return;
> -
> -	__execlists_context_unpin(ce);
> -}
> -
>   static int __context_pin(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, struct i915_vma *vma)
>   {
>   	unsigned int flags;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 0c0c9f531e4e..001cf6bcb349 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1195,12 +1195,6 @@ static void intel_ring_context_destroy(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   static void intel_ring_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->gem_context->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count == 0);
> -
> -	if (--ce->pin_count)
> -		return;
> -
>   	if (ce->state) {
>   		ce->state->obj->pin_global--;
>   		i915_vma_unpin(ce->state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
> index 33eddfc1f8ce..f1ac7453053e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
> @@ -74,9 +74,6 @@ static void hw_delay_complete(struct timer_list *t)
>   
>   static void mock_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> -	if (--ce->pin_count)
> -		return;
> -
>   	i915_gem_context_put(ce->gem_context);
>   }
>   
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-17 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17  7:40 [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915: Move request->ctx aside Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915: Move fiddling with engine->last_retired_context Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915: Store a pointer to intel_context in i915_request Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915: Pull the context->pin_count dec into the common intel_context_unpin Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 10:20   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-05-17 10:35     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915: Be irqsafe inside reset Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 10:27   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17 10:46     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915: Make intel_engine_dump irqsafe Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 10:28   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/execlists: Handle copying default context state for atomic reset Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 10:37   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915: Allow init_breadcrumbs to be used from irq context Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 10:40   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/execlists: HWACK checking superseded checking port[0].count Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 10:55   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17 17:03     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915: Remove USES_GUC_SUBMISSION() pointer chasing from gen8_cs_irq_handler Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 10:58   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17 11:24     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 13:13       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/execlists: Double check rpm wakeref Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 11:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915: After reset on sanitization, reset the engine backends Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/execlists: Reset the CSB head tracking on reset/sanitization Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/execlists: Pull submit after dequeue under timeline lock Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/execlists: Process one CSB interrupt at a time Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/execlists: Unify CSB access pointers Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/execlists: Process the CSB directly from inside the irq handler Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submission (avoid tasklet/ksoftirqd) Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 13:13   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17 17:07     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18  8:06       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-18  8:18         ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18 19:36         ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18 21:21     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  7:40 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915: Combine gt irq ack/handlers Chris Wilson
2018-05-17  8:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/19] drm/i915: Move request->ctx aside Patchwork
2018-05-17  8:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-17  8:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-17 11:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e637c1be-2ffa-3c77-a1b0-ecc8c83dbedd@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.