All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
Cc: jason.andryuk@amd.com, christopher.w.clark@gmail.com,
	stefano.stabellini@amd.com,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
	"Bertrand Marquis" <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
	"Michal Orzel" <michal.orzel@amd.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 kernel with hyperlaunch
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 07:36:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb927472-5399-4a82-aefd-7ffd28e09788@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2501301250410.11632@ubuntu-linux-20-04-desktop>

On 30.01.2025 22:14, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 26.12.2024 17:57, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>>> Look for a subnode of type `multiboot,kernel` within a domain node. If found,
>>> process the reg property for the MB1 module index. If the bootargs property is
>>> present and there was not an MB1 string, then use the command line from the
>>> device tree definition.
>>
>> While multiboot is apparently the first x86-specific part (as far as Xen goes)
>> to be put under domain-builder/, I wonder:
>> - Wouldn't looking for "multiboot,kernel" simply yield nothing on non-x86,
>>   so having the code under common/ would still be okay?
> 
> One small clarification: multiboot,kernel is actually common between
> both ARM and x86. It is "module-index" which is x86-specific and would
> "simply yield nothing on non-x86", as you wrote.
> 
> I'll let Dan address your point that "having the code under common/
> would still be okay".
> 
> 
>> - What's "multiboot" describing here? The origin of the module? (What other
>>   origins would then be possible? How would MB1 and MB2 be distinguished?
>>   What about a native xen.efi boot?) A property of the kernel (when Linux
>>   doesn't use MB)?
> 
> Each device tree node has a compatible string to qualify what kind of
> information the node is describing. The compatible string for device
> tree nodes describing a kernel binary or a ramdisk previously loaded
> into memory by a bootloader have a "multiboot," prefix. See
> docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt. This is unrelated to the binary
> multiboot protocol Grub uses on x86 to boot Xen.
> 
> A distinction between MB1 and MB2 is not needed in device tree, that
> information is retrieved via the Grub multiboot protocol as usual. The
> only thing needed here in device tree is the location of the kernel,
> either by RAM address, or by Grub multiboot module index. This last
> option (Grub multiboot module index) is the "module-index" property I
> mentioned above.

Hmm, then I'm afraid I can't make sense of the mentioning of MB1 in the
description. Yet that's a point more towards Daniel than you.

Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-31  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-26 16:57 [PATCH v2 00/15] Hyperlaunch device tree for dom0 Daniel P. Smith
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] x86/boot: introduce boot domain Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-30 13:45   ` Jan Beulich
2025-04-05  0:04     ` Daniel P. Smith
2025-04-07  7:10       ` Jan Beulich
2025-04-09 23:55         ` Daniel P. Smith
2025-04-10  6:37           ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] x86/boot: introduce domid field to struct boot_domain Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-30 13:51   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] x86/boot: add cmdline " Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-10 19:52   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-15 17:22     ` Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-15 19:50       ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-30 14:15   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] kconfig: introduce option to independently enable libfdt Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-30 14:19   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] kconfig: introduce domain builder config option Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-10 19:55   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-15 17:24     ` Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-30 14:30   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] x86/hyperlaunch: introduce the domain builder Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-08 21:54   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-15 17:25     ` Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-30 14:52   ` Jan Beulich
2025-04-01 18:01     ` Jason Andryuk
2025-04-02  9:25       ` Jan Beulich
2025-04-02 19:44         ` Jason Andryuk
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] x86/hyperlaunch: initial support for hyperlaunch device tree Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-10 22:20   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-15 17:47     ` Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-30 15:01   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 kernel with hyperlaunch Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-10 23:06   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-30 15:42   ` Jan Beulich
2025-01-30 21:14     ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-01-31  6:36       ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] x86/hyperlaunch: obtain cmdline from device tree Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-15 16:38   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-30 15:58   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 initrd with hyperlaunch Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-15 16:43   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-30 16:39   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] x86/hyperlaunch: add domain id parsing to domain config Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-30 16:49   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] x86/hyperlaunch: specify dom0 mode with device tree Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-15 19:42   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-30 16:55   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] x86/hyperlaunch: add memory parsing to domain config Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-15 16:55   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-30 17:01   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] x86/hyperlaunch: add max vcpu parsing of hyperlaunch device tree Daniel P. Smith
2025-01-15 19:40   ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-30 17:04   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-26 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] x86/hyperlaunch: add capabilities to boot domain Daniel P. Smith
2025-02-04 11:13   ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-04 15:40     ` Jason Andryuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb927472-5399-4a82-aefd-7ffd28e09788@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=christopher.w.clark@gmail.com \
    --cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
    --cc=jason.andryuk@amd.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.