* RFC after the fact - bug 1987
@ 2007-03-16 16:16 Rolf Leggewie
2007-03-16 17:00 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-03-16 18:43 ` Rolf Leggewie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rolf Leggewie @ 2007-03-16 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hi,
it seems I have still a few things to learn as far as updating OE
metadata goes. Furthermore it seems I might have created the first
major fuck-up. I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused to the
OE community.
Now, to sort things out; I committed
a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166 yesterday to fix bug 1987. It
seemed like an obvious case (move debug files into -dbg package) which
is why I dared to commit. psokolovsky made me aware that an RFC had
been necessary to make this commit to a core part of OE and that it
might have broken compilation for some OE users.
Now here I am trying to do The Right Thing[TM]. I want to discuss "mtn
diff -r e9d53f524190d295cb769c7594711fd76eb197b7 -r
a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166". Please let me know if there
is anything wrong with this change. If it should be reverted, feel free
to do so or let me know via mail or IRC and I will fix it pronto.
Regards
Rolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC after the fact - bug 1987
2007-03-16 16:16 RFC after the fact - bug 1987 Rolf Leggewie
@ 2007-03-16 17:00 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-03-16 18:43 ` Rolf Leggewie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Sokolovsky @ 2007-03-16 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rolf Leggewie; +Cc: openembedded-devel
Hello Rolf,
Friday, March 16, 2007, 6:16:34 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> it seems I have still a few things to learn as far as updating OE
> metadata goes. Furthermore it seems I might have created the first
> major fuck-up. I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused to the
> OE community.
> Now, to sort things out; I committed
> a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166 yesterday to fix bug 1987. It
> seemed like an obvious case (move debug files into -dbg package) which
> is why I dared to commit. psokolovsky made me aware that an RFC had
> been necessary to make this commit to a core part of OE and that it
> might have broken compilation for some OE users.
> Now here I am trying to do The Right Thing[TM]. I want to discuss "mtn
> diff -r e9d53f524190d295cb769c7594711fd76eb197b7 -r
> a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166". Please let me know if there
> is anything wrong with this change. If it should be reverted, feel free
> to do so or let me know via mail or IRC and I will fix it pronto.
I doubt that it's due to that easy change. I suspect your earlier
commits, 2c516898480b1bc053c9cbf6da853a016059c4c6 &
286930242424d10b2503eb290dbc31c7975bab74 are to blame.
Either way, I get here:
$bitbake angstrom-x11-image
OE Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION = "1.6.7"
OE_REVISION = "25edfc91e04a9233cb67583981d1d8aa3e82f0c0"
TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE = "h4000"
DISTRO = "angstrom"
DISTRO_VERSION = "test-20070316"
TARGET_FPU = "soft"
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.6.19-hh8 of linux-handhelds-2.6 not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.6.19-hh8 of linux-handhelds-2.6 not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc-initial not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc not available
NOTE: preferred version 2.5 of glibc-intermediate not available
NOTE: multiple preferred providers are available (glibc, glibc, glibc);
NOTE: consider defining only one PREFERRED_PROVIDER to match runtime glibc-gconv-iso8859-1
NOTE: package glibc-2.3.5+cvs20050627: started
Whereas:
bitbake glibc -v
NOTE: Selecting already-staged glibc (2.5-r5) to satisfy glibc
(-c rebuild rebuilds 2.5)
The same was report by at least 3 other people, including using
other distro than Angstrom.
> Regards
> Rolf
--
Best regards,
Paul mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC after the fact - bug 1987
2007-03-16 16:16 RFC after the fact - bug 1987 Rolf Leggewie
2007-03-16 17:00 ` Paul Sokolovsky
@ 2007-03-16 18:43 ` Rolf Leggewie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rolf Leggewie @ 2007-03-16 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Now, to sort things out;
Despite some very kind help from XorA, it did not become clear where
exactly the problem was coming from. Thus, I reverted all changes I
made to packages/glibc/ in the last few days, including the unifcation
stuff. My intention is to put this back in after a few more tests.
Here are the changes in the order I had applied them
http://oz.leggewie.org/wip/2c516898480b1bc053c9cbf6da853a016059c4c6.patch
http://oz.leggewie.org/wip/286930242424d10b2503eb290dbc31c7975bab74.patch
http://oz.leggewie.org/wip/a96c9acac99b5599d2b0fb0a518603646414d166.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-16 17:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-16 16:16 RFC after the fact - bug 1987 Rolf Leggewie
2007-03-16 17:00 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-03-16 18:43 ` Rolf Leggewie
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.