is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Yocto]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 668 bytes --]

|okay reading the doc README it states There are six openstack layers 
that are used to build a controller/compute node image pair. The 
dependencies of these layers are also required for a build, and are 
listed in the layers themselves. - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack - 
meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-deploy - 
meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-deploy - 
meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-qemu - 
meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-test-config - 
meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-test-config so the 
question is, is this actually usable to bitbake openstack based images ? 
or a Work in progress ? |


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 841 bytes --]

Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Paul Barker]

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:16, Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
>

Please set your name in your email client to something other than
"Yocto" so as not to mislead & confuse people.

-- 
Paul Barker
Konsulko Group

Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Yocto]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 435 bytes --]


On 10/27/20 4:30 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:16, Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
> Please set your name in your email client to something other than
> "Yocto" so as not to mislead & confuse people.

I already did that, its Y L Reddy, email addie is yocto@domain.com which 
gets mail for literally every yocto list, as it was mentioned before i 
did change the name... to Y L Reddy


>
>
> 
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1457 bytes --]

Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:05 AM Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/20 4:30 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:16, Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
>
> Please set your name in your email client to something other than
> "Yocto" so as not to mislead & confuse people.
>
> I already did that, its Y L Reddy, email addie is yocto@domain.com which gets mail for literally every yocto list, as it was mentioned before i did change the name... to Y L Reddy
>

Your mail client (or however you are sending messages) is still
misconfigured. It isn't filling in your real name, along with the
actual address.

Hence why I agree with Paul, very confusing as it comes through. In
particular, since your message isn't closed with your name, we'd
otherwise have no idea who was sending it.

Bruce

>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II

Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Dingo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1153 bytes --]


On 10/27/20 7:05 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:05 AM Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/27/20 4:30 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:16, Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please set your name in your email client to something other than
>> "Yocto" so as not to mislead & confuse people.
>>
>> I already did that, its Y L Reddy, email addie is yocto@domain.com which gets mail for literally every yocto list, as it was mentioned before i did change the name... to Y L Reddy
>>
> Your mail client (or however you are sending messages) is still
> misconfigured. It isn't filling in your real name, along with the
> actual address.
>
> Hence why I agree with Paul, very confusing as it comes through. In
> particular, since your message isn't closed with your name, we'd
> otherwise have no idea who was sending it.

Yeah using firefox and i already unsubbed everything and will be using 
this addie from now on, appears its a bug in groups, we tested and 
modified, no matter what it still comes as Yocto


>
> Bruce
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> 
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2365 bytes --]

Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Yocto]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 515 bytes --]

On 10/27/20 5:04 PM, Yocto wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/20 4:30 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:16, Yocto<yocto@optimcloud.com>  wrote:
>> Please set your name in your email client to something other than
>> "Yocto" so as not to mislead & confuse people.
>
> I already did that, its Y L Reddy, email addie is yocto@domain.com 
> which gets mail for literally every yocto list, as it was mentioned 
> before i did change the name... to Y L Reddy
>
maybe that fixed it
>
>
>>
>
> 
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1980 bytes --]

Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
>
> okay reading the doc README it states
>
> There are six openstack layers that are used to build a controller/compute
> node image pair. The dependencies of these layers are also required for a
> build, and are listed in the layers themselves.
>
>    - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack
>    - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-deploy
>    - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-deploy
>    - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-qemu
>    - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-test-config
>    - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-test-config
>
> so the question is, is this actually usable to bitbake openstack based images ? or a Work in progress ?
>

They are now a work in progress. They *worked*, but we didn't have a
dedicated maintainer, so we make sure the re-usable recipes work (and
a few have migrated to the main meta-virt over time), but to build and
deploy working controller and compute nodes, they wouldn't be usable
out of the box.

Bruce

>
> 
>


-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II

Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ?

[Dingo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1390 bytes --]


On 10/27/20 7:07 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:
>> okay reading the doc README it states
>>
>> There are six openstack layers that are used to build a controller/compute
>> node image pair. The dependencies of these layers are also required for a
>> build, and are listed in the layers themselves.
>>
>>     - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack
>>     - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-deploy
>>     - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-deploy
>>     - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-qemu
>>     - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-test-config
>>     - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-test-config
>>
>> so the question is, is this actually usable to bitbake openstack based images ? or a Work in progress ?
>>
> They are now a work in progress. They *worked*, but we didn't have a
> dedicated maintainer, so we make sure the re-usable recipes work (and
> a few have migrated to the main meta-virt over time), but to build and
> deploy working controller and compute nodes, they wouldn't be usable
> out of the box.
>
> Bruce

So they need updating, maintaining, i see alot of python2 and python3 
mixed in here.

guess they would have to be gone through one by one to get it back to 
functional.

Ill take a look.


>
>>
>>
>
>
> 
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2458 bytes --]