* [PATCH 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
With this patch series I am trying to remove GPU address dependency in
TTM and moving GPU address calculation to individual drm drivers.
I tested this patch series on qxl, bochs and amdgpu. Christian tested it on radeon HW.
It would be nice if someone test this for nouveau and vmgfx.
Nirmoy Das (8):
drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo
drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
drm/vmwgfx: don't use ttm bo->offset
drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
drm/qxl: don't use ttm bo->offset
drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++----
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 6 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 5 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 5 ----
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 9 -------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -----
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 --
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
35 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, Huang Rui, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
GPU address should belong to driver not in memory management.
This patch moves ttm bo.offset and gpu_offset calculation to amdgpu driver.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
index e3f16b49e970..04e78f783638 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, u32 domain,
bo->pin_count++;
if (max_offset != 0) {
- u64 domain_start = bo->tbo.bdev->man[mem_type].gpu_offset;
+ u64 domain_start = amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(adev, mem_type);
WARN_ON_ONCE(max_offset <
(amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(bo) - domain_start));
}
@@ -1445,7 +1445,25 @@ u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
!(bo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS));
- return amdgpu_gmc_sign_extend(bo->tbo.offset);
+ return amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(bo);
+}
+
+/**
+ * amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check - return GPU offset of bo
+ * @bo: amdgpu object for which we query the offset
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * current GPU offset of the object without raising warnings.
+ */
+u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
+{
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
+ uint64_t offset;
+
+ offset = (bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
+ amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(adev, bo->tbo.mem.mem_type);
+
+ return amdgpu_gmc_sign_extend(offset);
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
index 36dec51d1ef1..1d86b4c7a1f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ void amdgpu_bo_fence(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, struct dma_fence *fence,
bool shared);
int amdgpu_bo_sync_wait(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, void *owner, bool intr);
u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
+u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
int amdgpu_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
int amdgpu_bo_restore_shadow(struct amdgpu_bo *shadow,
struct dma_fence **fence);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
index 3ab46d4647e4..e329a108e760 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ static int amdgpu_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_TT:
/* GTT memory */
man->func = &amdgpu_gtt_mgr_func;
- man->gpu_offset = adev->gmc.gart_start;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
@@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static int amdgpu_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
/* "On-card" video ram */
man->func = &amdgpu_vram_mgr_func;
- man->gpu_offset = adev->gmc.vram_start;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
@@ -116,7 +114,6 @@ static int amdgpu_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case AMDGPU_PL_OA:
/* On-chip GDS memory*/
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = 0;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED;
@@ -264,7 +261,7 @@ static uint64_t amdgpu_mm_node_addr(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
if (mm_node->start != AMDGPU_BO_INVALID_OFFSET) {
addr = mm_node->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
- addr += bo->bdev->man[mem->mem_type].gpu_offset;
+ addr += amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->bdev), mem->mem_type);
}
return addr;
}
@@ -751,6 +748,27 @@ static unsigned long amdgpu_ttm_io_mem_pfn(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
(offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
+/**
+ * amdgpu_ttm_domain_start - Returns GPU start address
+ * @adev: amdgpu device object
+ * @type: type of the memory
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * GPU start address of a memory domain
+ */
+
+uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t type)
+{
+ switch(type) {
+ case TTM_PL_TT:
+ return adev->gmc.gart_start;
+ case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+ return adev->gmc.vram_start;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* TTM backend functions.
*/
@@ -1162,9 +1180,6 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
bo->mem = tmp;
}
- bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
- bo->bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
index 0dddedc06ae3..2c90a95c4b27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ int amdgpu_fill_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
int amdgpu_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
int amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
int amdgpu_ttm_recover_gart(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo);
+uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t type);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR)
int amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, struct page **pages);
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, Huang Rui,
sean, christian.koenig, kraxel
GPU address should belong to driver not in memory management.
This patch moves ttm bo.offset and gpu_offset calculation to amdgpu driver.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
index e3f16b49e970..04e78f783638 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, u32 domain,
bo->pin_count++;
if (max_offset != 0) {
- u64 domain_start = bo->tbo.bdev->man[mem_type].gpu_offset;
+ u64 domain_start = amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(adev, mem_type);
WARN_ON_ONCE(max_offset <
(amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(bo) - domain_start));
}
@@ -1445,7 +1445,25 @@ u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
!(bo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS));
- return amdgpu_gmc_sign_extend(bo->tbo.offset);
+ return amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(bo);
+}
+
+/**
+ * amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check - return GPU offset of bo
+ * @bo: amdgpu object for which we query the offset
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * current GPU offset of the object without raising warnings.
+ */
+u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
+{
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
+ uint64_t offset;
+
+ offset = (bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
+ amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(adev, bo->tbo.mem.mem_type);
+
+ return amdgpu_gmc_sign_extend(offset);
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
index 36dec51d1ef1..1d86b4c7a1f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ void amdgpu_bo_fence(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, struct dma_fence *fence,
bool shared);
int amdgpu_bo_sync_wait(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, void *owner, bool intr);
u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
+u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
int amdgpu_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
int amdgpu_bo_restore_shadow(struct amdgpu_bo *shadow,
struct dma_fence **fence);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
index 3ab46d4647e4..e329a108e760 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ static int amdgpu_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_TT:
/* GTT memory */
man->func = &amdgpu_gtt_mgr_func;
- man->gpu_offset = adev->gmc.gart_start;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
@@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static int amdgpu_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
/* "On-card" video ram */
man->func = &amdgpu_vram_mgr_func;
- man->gpu_offset = adev->gmc.vram_start;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
@@ -116,7 +114,6 @@ static int amdgpu_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case AMDGPU_PL_OA:
/* On-chip GDS memory*/
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = 0;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED;
@@ -264,7 +261,7 @@ static uint64_t amdgpu_mm_node_addr(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
if (mm_node->start != AMDGPU_BO_INVALID_OFFSET) {
addr = mm_node->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
- addr += bo->bdev->man[mem->mem_type].gpu_offset;
+ addr += amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->bdev), mem->mem_type);
}
return addr;
}
@@ -751,6 +748,27 @@ static unsigned long amdgpu_ttm_io_mem_pfn(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
(offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
+/**
+ * amdgpu_ttm_domain_start - Returns GPU start address
+ * @adev: amdgpu device object
+ * @type: type of the memory
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * GPU start address of a memory domain
+ */
+
+uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t type)
+{
+ switch(type) {
+ case TTM_PL_TT:
+ return adev->gmc.gart_start;
+ case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+ return adev->gmc.vram_start;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* TTM backend functions.
*/
@@ -1162,9 +1180,6 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
bo->mem = tmp;
}
- bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
- bo->bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
index 0dddedc06ae3..2c90a95c4b27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ int amdgpu_fill_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
int amdgpu_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
int amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
int amdgpu_ttm_recover_gart(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo);
+uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_domain_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t type);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_USERPTR)
int amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, struct page **pages);
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/8] drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, christian.koenig,
kraxel
Calculate GPU offset in radeon_bo_gpu_offset without depending on
bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index 30e32adc1fc6..b7c3fb2bfb54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -2828,6 +2828,7 @@ extern void radeon_ttm_set_active_vram_size(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 size
extern void radeon_program_register_sequence(struct radeon_device *rdev,
const u32 *registers,
const u32 array_size);
+struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev);
/*
* vm
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
index d23f2ed4126e..4d37571c7ff5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
@@ -90,7 +90,21 @@ static inline void radeon_bo_unreserve(struct radeon_bo *bo)
*/
static inline u64 radeon_bo_gpu_offset(struct radeon_bo *bo)
{
- return bo->tbo.offset;
+ struct radeon_device *rdev;
+ u64 start = 0;
+
+ rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->tbo.bdev);
+
+ switch(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type) {
+ case TTM_PL_TT:
+ start = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
+ break;
+ case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+ start = rdev->mc.vram_start;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return (bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start;
}
static inline unsigned long radeon_bo_size(struct radeon_bo *bo)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
index badf1b6d1549..1c8303468e8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
static int radeon_ttm_debugfs_init(struct radeon_device *rdev);
static void radeon_ttm_debugfs_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
-static struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
+struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
{
struct radeon_mman *mman;
struct radeon_device *rdev;
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
break;
case TTM_PL_TT:
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
@@ -104,7 +103,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
/* "On-card" video ram */
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.vram_start;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/8] drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
Calculate GPU offset in radeon_bo_gpu_offset without depending on
bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index 30e32adc1fc6..b7c3fb2bfb54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -2828,6 +2828,7 @@ extern void radeon_ttm_set_active_vram_size(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 size
extern void radeon_program_register_sequence(struct radeon_device *rdev,
const u32 *registers,
const u32 array_size);
+struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev);
/*
* vm
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
index d23f2ed4126e..4d37571c7ff5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
@@ -90,7 +90,21 @@ static inline void radeon_bo_unreserve(struct radeon_bo *bo)
*/
static inline u64 radeon_bo_gpu_offset(struct radeon_bo *bo)
{
- return bo->tbo.offset;
+ struct radeon_device *rdev;
+ u64 start = 0;
+
+ rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->tbo.bdev);
+
+ switch(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type) {
+ case TTM_PL_TT:
+ start = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
+ break;
+ case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+ start = rdev->mc.vram_start;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return (bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start;
}
static inline unsigned long radeon_bo_size(struct radeon_bo *bo)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
index badf1b6d1549..1c8303468e8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
static int radeon_ttm_debugfs_init(struct radeon_device *rdev);
static void radeon_ttm_debugfs_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
-static struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
+struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
{
struct radeon_mman *mman;
struct radeon_device *rdev;
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
break;
case TTM_PL_TT:
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
@@ -104,7 +103,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
/* "On-card" video ram */
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.vram_start;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/8] drm/vmwgfx: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, christian.koenig,
kraxel
Calculate GPU offset within vmwgfx driver itself without depending on
bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 --
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c
index 8b71bf6b58ef..1e59c019affa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ int vmw_bo_pin_in_start_of_vram(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &placement, &ctx);
/* For some reason we didn't end up at the start of vram */
- WARN_ON(ret == 0 && bo->offset != 0);
+ WARN_ON(ret == 0 && bo->mem.start != 0);
if (!ret)
vmw_bo_pin_reserved(buf, true);
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ void vmw_bo_get_guest_ptr(const struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
{
if (bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) {
ptr->gmrId = SVGA_GMR_FRAMEBUFFER;
- ptr->offset = bo->offset;
+ ptr->offset = bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
} else {
ptr->gmrId = bo->mem.start;
ptr->offset = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
index 73489a45decb..72c2cf4053df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
@@ -3313,7 +3313,7 @@ static void vmw_apply_relocations(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context)
bo = &reloc->vbo->base;
switch (bo->mem.mem_type) {
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
- reloc->location->offset += bo->offset;
+ reloc->location->offset += bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
reloc->location->gmrId = SVGA_GMR_FRAMEBUFFER;
break;
case VMW_PL_GMR:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
index e5252ef3812f..1cdc445b24c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int vmw_fifo_emit_dummy_legacy_query(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
if (bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) {
cmd->body.guestResult.gmrId = SVGA_GMR_FRAMEBUFFER;
- cmd->body.guestResult.offset = bo->offset;
+ cmd->body.guestResult.offset = bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
} else {
cmd->body.guestResult.gmrId = bo->mem.start;
cmd->body.guestResult.offset = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
index 3f3b2c7a208a..e7134aebeb81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
@@ -750,7 +750,6 @@ static int vmw_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
/* "On-card" video ram */
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = 0;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
@@ -763,7 +762,6 @@ static int vmw_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
* slots as well as the bo size.
*/
man->func = &vmw_gmrid_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = 0;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/8] drm/vmwgfx: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
Calculate GPU offset within vmwgfx driver itself without depending on
bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 --
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c
index 8b71bf6b58ef..1e59c019affa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ int vmw_bo_pin_in_start_of_vram(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &placement, &ctx);
/* For some reason we didn't end up at the start of vram */
- WARN_ON(ret == 0 && bo->offset != 0);
+ WARN_ON(ret == 0 && bo->mem.start != 0);
if (!ret)
vmw_bo_pin_reserved(buf, true);
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ void vmw_bo_get_guest_ptr(const struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
{
if (bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) {
ptr->gmrId = SVGA_GMR_FRAMEBUFFER;
- ptr->offset = bo->offset;
+ ptr->offset = bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
} else {
ptr->gmrId = bo->mem.start;
ptr->offset = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
index 73489a45decb..72c2cf4053df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
@@ -3313,7 +3313,7 @@ static void vmw_apply_relocations(struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context)
bo = &reloc->vbo->base;
switch (bo->mem.mem_type) {
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
- reloc->location->offset += bo->offset;
+ reloc->location->offset += bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
reloc->location->gmrId = SVGA_GMR_FRAMEBUFFER;
break;
case VMW_PL_GMR:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
index e5252ef3812f..1cdc445b24c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int vmw_fifo_emit_dummy_legacy_query(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
if (bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) {
cmd->body.guestResult.gmrId = SVGA_GMR_FRAMEBUFFER;
- cmd->body.guestResult.offset = bo->offset;
+ cmd->body.guestResult.offset = bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
} else {
cmd->body.guestResult.gmrId = bo->mem.start;
cmd->body.guestResult.offset = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
index 3f3b2c7a208a..e7134aebeb81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
@@ -750,7 +750,6 @@ static int vmw_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
/* "On-card" video ram */
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = 0;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
@@ -763,7 +762,6 @@ static int vmw_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
* slots as well as the bo size.
*/
man->func = &vmw_gmrid_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = 0;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/8] drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, christian.koenig,
kraxel
Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++++-----
15 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
index 1f08de4241e0..d06a93f2b38a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ nv04_crtc_do_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
fb = nouveau_framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb);
}
- nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
+ nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->offset;
if (nv_crtc->lut.depth != drm_fb->format->depth) {
nv_crtc->lut.depth = drm_fb->format->depth;
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ nv04_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv,
nv04_cursor_upload(dev, cursor, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo);
nouveau_bo_unmap(cursor);
- nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset;
+ nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset;
nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.offset);
nv_crtc->cursor.show(nv_crtc, true);
out:
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ nv04_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
/* Initialize a page flip struct */
*s = (struct nv04_page_flip_state)
{ { }, event, crtc, fb->format->cpp[0] * 8, fb->pitches[0],
- new_bo->bo.offset };
+ new_bo->offset };
/* Keep vblanks on during flip, for the target crtc of this flip */
drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
index 44ee82d0c9b6..89a4ddfcc55f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ nv04_display_init(struct drm_device *dev, bool resume, bool runtime)
continue;
if (nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset)
- nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset);
+ nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset);
nv_crtc->cursor.set_pos(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor_saved_x,
nv_crtc->cursor_saved_y);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
index a3a0a73ae8ab..9529bd9053e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
nvif_mask(dev, NV_PCRTC_ENGINE_CTRL + soff2, NV_CRTC_FSEL_OVERLAY, 0);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BASE(flip), 0);
- nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
+ nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_SIZE_IN(flip), src_h << 16 | src_w);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_POINT_IN(flip), src_y << 16 | src_x);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_DS_DX(flip), (src_w << 20) / crtc_w);
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
if (format & NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT_PLANAR) {
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_BASE(flip), 0);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_OFFSET_BUFF(flip),
- nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset + fb->offsets[1]);
+ nv_fb->nvbo->offset + fb->offsets[1]);
}
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT(flip), format | fb->pitches[0]);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_STOP, 0);
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ nv04_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_START_ADDRESS + 4 * i,
- nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
+ nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_PITCH_LENGTH + 4 * i,
fb->pitches[0]);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_OFFSET + 4 * i, 0);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
index 00a85f1e1a4a..67829f04b2c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ base507c_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, head, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
+ disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "base%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
index e7fcfa6e6467..793dcb2ea196 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ core507d_new_(const struct nv50_core_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &core->chan);
+ disp->sync->offset, &core->chan);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "core%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
index 8ccd96113bad..4cce1078140a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ovly507e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
+ disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "ovly%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
index 890315291b01..e90ffa4a5230 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ nv50_wndw_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_plane_state *state)
}
asyw->state.fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(fb->nvbo->bo.base.resv);
- asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
+ asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->offset;
if (wndw->func->prepare) {
asyh = nv50_head_atom_get(asyw->state.state, asyw->state.crtc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
index b92dc3461bbd..bb84e4d54a33 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ wndwc37e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
+ disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "qndw%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
index e2bae1424502..c32a8ca67f82 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
@@ -558,13 +558,13 @@ nouveau_abi16_ioctl_notifierobj_alloc(ABI16_IOCTL_ARGS)
if (drm->agp.bridge) {
args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_AGP;
args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
- args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
- args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
+ args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
+ args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
} else {
args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_VM;
args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
- args.start += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
- args.limit += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
+ args.start += chan->ntfy->offset;
+ args.limit += chan->ntfy->offset;
}
client->route = NVDRM_OBJECT_ABI16;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index 2b4b21b02e40..ebf31035e1e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
}
+ nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
} else {
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
index 38f9d8350963..e944b4aa5547 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct nouveau_bo {
int pbbo_index;
bool validate_mapped;
+ /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
+ uint64_t offset;
+
struct list_head vma_list;
unsigned contig:1;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
index d9381a053169..3d71dfcb2fde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ nouveau_channel_prep(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nvif_device *device,
* pushbuf lives in, this is because the GEM code requires that
* we be able to call out to other (indirect) push buffers
*/
- chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->bo.offset;
+ chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->offset;
if (device->info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
ret = nouveau_vma_new(chan->push.buffer, chan->vmm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
index 0ad5d87b5a8e..475ed53b99f1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long nouveau_dmem_page_addr(struct page *page)
struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk = page->zone_device_data;
unsigned long idx = page_to_pfn(page) - chunk->pfn_first;
- return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->bo.offset;
+ return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->offset;
}
static void nouveau_dmem_page_free(struct page *page)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
index 0c5cdda3c336..508b118c0953 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
/* To allow resizeing without swapping buffers */
NV_INFO(drm, "allocated %dx%d fb: 0x%llx, bo %p\n",
- fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->bo.offset, nvbo);
+ fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->offset, nvbo);
vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(dev->pdev, info);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index f5ece1f94973..cadff37eade8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ nouveau_gem_info(struct drm_file *file_priv, struct drm_gem_object *gem,
rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
else
rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
- rep->offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
+ rep->offset = nvbo->offset;
if (vmm->vmm.object.oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_VMM_NV50) {
vma = nouveau_vma_find(nvbo, vmm);
if (!vma)
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
}
if (drm->client.device.info.family < NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
- if (nvbo->bo.offset == b->presumed.offset &&
+ if (nvbo->offset == b->presumed.offset &&
((nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
b->presumed.domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) ||
(nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
else
b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
- b->presumed.offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
+ b->presumed.offset = nvbo->offset;
b->presumed.valid = 0;
relocs++;
}
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
- OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
+ OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
}
} else {
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
}
OUT_RING(chan, 0x20000000 |
- (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset));
+ (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset));
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
for (j = 0; j < NOUVEAU_DMA_SKIPS; j++)
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/8] drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++++-----
15 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
index 1f08de4241e0..d06a93f2b38a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ nv04_crtc_do_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
fb = nouveau_framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb);
}
- nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
+ nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->offset;
if (nv_crtc->lut.depth != drm_fb->format->depth) {
nv_crtc->lut.depth = drm_fb->format->depth;
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ nv04_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv,
nv04_cursor_upload(dev, cursor, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo);
nouveau_bo_unmap(cursor);
- nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset;
+ nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset;
nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.offset);
nv_crtc->cursor.show(nv_crtc, true);
out:
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ nv04_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
/* Initialize a page flip struct */
*s = (struct nv04_page_flip_state)
{ { }, event, crtc, fb->format->cpp[0] * 8, fb->pitches[0],
- new_bo->bo.offset };
+ new_bo->offset };
/* Keep vblanks on during flip, for the target crtc of this flip */
drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
index 44ee82d0c9b6..89a4ddfcc55f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ nv04_display_init(struct drm_device *dev, bool resume, bool runtime)
continue;
if (nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset)
- nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset);
+ nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset);
nv_crtc->cursor.set_pos(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor_saved_x,
nv_crtc->cursor_saved_y);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
index a3a0a73ae8ab..9529bd9053e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
nvif_mask(dev, NV_PCRTC_ENGINE_CTRL + soff2, NV_CRTC_FSEL_OVERLAY, 0);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BASE(flip), 0);
- nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
+ nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_SIZE_IN(flip), src_h << 16 | src_w);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_POINT_IN(flip), src_y << 16 | src_x);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_DS_DX(flip), (src_w << 20) / crtc_w);
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
if (format & NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT_PLANAR) {
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_BASE(flip), 0);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_OFFSET_BUFF(flip),
- nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset + fb->offsets[1]);
+ nv_fb->nvbo->offset + fb->offsets[1]);
}
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT(flip), format | fb->pitches[0]);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_STOP, 0);
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ nv04_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_START_ADDRESS + 4 * i,
- nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
+ nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_PITCH_LENGTH + 4 * i,
fb->pitches[0]);
nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_OFFSET + 4 * i, 0);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
index 00a85f1e1a4a..67829f04b2c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ base507c_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, head, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
+ disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "base%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
index e7fcfa6e6467..793dcb2ea196 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ core507d_new_(const struct nv50_core_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &core->chan);
+ disp->sync->offset, &core->chan);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "core%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
index 8ccd96113bad..4cce1078140a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ovly507e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
+ disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "ovly%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
index 890315291b01..e90ffa4a5230 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ nv50_wndw_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_plane_state *state)
}
asyw->state.fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(fb->nvbo->bo.base.resv);
- asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
+ asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->offset;
if (wndw->func->prepare) {
asyh = nv50_head_atom_get(asyw->state.state, asyw->state.crtc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
index b92dc3461bbd..bb84e4d54a33 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ wndwc37e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
&oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
- disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
+ disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
if (ret) {
NV_ERROR(drm, "qndw%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
index e2bae1424502..c32a8ca67f82 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
@@ -558,13 +558,13 @@ nouveau_abi16_ioctl_notifierobj_alloc(ABI16_IOCTL_ARGS)
if (drm->agp.bridge) {
args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_AGP;
args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
- args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
- args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
+ args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
+ args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
} else {
args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_VM;
args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
- args.start += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
- args.limit += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
+ args.start += chan->ntfy->offset;
+ args.limit += chan->ntfy->offset;
}
client->route = NVDRM_OBJECT_ABI16;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index 2b4b21b02e40..ebf31035e1e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
}
+ nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
} else {
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
index 38f9d8350963..e944b4aa5547 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct nouveau_bo {
int pbbo_index;
bool validate_mapped;
+ /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
+ uint64_t offset;
+
struct list_head vma_list;
unsigned contig:1;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
index d9381a053169..3d71dfcb2fde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ nouveau_channel_prep(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nvif_device *device,
* pushbuf lives in, this is because the GEM code requires that
* we be able to call out to other (indirect) push buffers
*/
- chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->bo.offset;
+ chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->offset;
if (device->info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
ret = nouveau_vma_new(chan->push.buffer, chan->vmm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
index 0ad5d87b5a8e..475ed53b99f1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long nouveau_dmem_page_addr(struct page *page)
struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk = page->zone_device_data;
unsigned long idx = page_to_pfn(page) - chunk->pfn_first;
- return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->bo.offset;
+ return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->offset;
}
static void nouveau_dmem_page_free(struct page *page)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
index 0c5cdda3c336..508b118c0953 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
/* To allow resizeing without swapping buffers */
NV_INFO(drm, "allocated %dx%d fb: 0x%llx, bo %p\n",
- fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->bo.offset, nvbo);
+ fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->offset, nvbo);
vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(dev->pdev, info);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index f5ece1f94973..cadff37eade8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ nouveau_gem_info(struct drm_file *file_priv, struct drm_gem_object *gem,
rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
else
rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
- rep->offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
+ rep->offset = nvbo->offset;
if (vmm->vmm.object.oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_VMM_NV50) {
vma = nouveau_vma_find(nvbo, vmm);
if (!vma)
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
}
if (drm->client.device.info.family < NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
- if (nvbo->bo.offset == b->presumed.offset &&
+ if (nvbo->offset == b->presumed.offset &&
((nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
b->presumed.domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) ||
(nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
else
b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
- b->presumed.offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
+ b->presumed.offset = nvbo->offset;
b->presumed.valid = 0;
relocs++;
}
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
- OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
+ OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
}
} else {
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
}
OUT_RING(chan, 0x20000000 |
- (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset));
+ (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset));
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
for (j = 0; j < NOUVEAU_DMA_SKIPS; j++)
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/8] drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:57 ` Alex Deucher
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2020-02-17 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das
Cc: Chunming Zhou, Thomas Hellstrom, Gerd Hoffmann, Dave Airlie,
kenny.ho, brian.welty, Maarten Lankhorst,
Maling list - DRI developers, nirmoy.das, VMware Graphics,
amd-gfx list, Daniel Vetter, Deucher, Alexander, Sean Paul,
Christian Koenig, Ben Skeggs
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Missing Acked or Reviewed prefix for Christian.
Alex
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++++-----
> 15 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
> index 1f08de4241e0..d06a93f2b38a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
> @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ nv04_crtc_do_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> fb = nouveau_framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb);
> }
>
> - nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
> + nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->offset;
>
> if (nv_crtc->lut.depth != drm_fb->format->depth) {
> nv_crtc->lut.depth = drm_fb->format->depth;
> @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ nv04_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv,
> nv04_cursor_upload(dev, cursor, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo);
>
> nouveau_bo_unmap(cursor);
> - nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset;
> + nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset;
> nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.offset);
> nv_crtc->cursor.show(nv_crtc, true);
> out:
> @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ nv04_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> /* Initialize a page flip struct */
> *s = (struct nv04_page_flip_state)
> { { }, event, crtc, fb->format->cpp[0] * 8, fb->pitches[0],
> - new_bo->bo.offset };
> + new_bo->offset };
>
> /* Keep vblanks on during flip, for the target crtc of this flip */
> drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> index 44ee82d0c9b6..89a4ddfcc55f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ nv04_display_init(struct drm_device *dev, bool resume, bool runtime)
> continue;
>
> if (nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset)
> - nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset);
> + nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset);
> nv_crtc->cursor.set_pos(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor_saved_x,
> nv_crtc->cursor_saved_y);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
> index a3a0a73ae8ab..9529bd9053e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> nvif_mask(dev, NV_PCRTC_ENGINE_CTRL + soff2, NV_CRTC_FSEL_OVERLAY, 0);
>
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BASE(flip), 0);
> - nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
> + nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_SIZE_IN(flip), src_h << 16 | src_w);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_POINT_IN(flip), src_y << 16 | src_x);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_DS_DX(flip), (src_w << 20) / crtc_w);
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> if (format & NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT_PLANAR) {
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_BASE(flip), 0);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_OFFSET_BUFF(flip),
> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset + fb->offsets[1]);
> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset + fb->offsets[1]);
> }
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT(flip), format | fb->pitches[0]);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_STOP, 0);
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ nv04_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>
> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_START_ADDRESS + 4 * i,
> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_PITCH_LENGTH + 4 * i,
> fb->pitches[0]);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_OFFSET + 4 * i, 0);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
> index 00a85f1e1a4a..67829f04b2c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ base507c_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, head, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "base%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> index e7fcfa6e6467..793dcb2ea196 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ core507d_new_(const struct nv50_core_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &core->chan);
> + disp->sync->offset, &core->chan);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "core%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
> index 8ccd96113bad..4cce1078140a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ovly507e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "ovly%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
> index 890315291b01..e90ffa4a5230 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ nv50_wndw_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_plane_state *state)
> }
>
> asyw->state.fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(fb->nvbo->bo.base.resv);
> - asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
> + asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->offset;
>
> if (wndw->func->prepare) {
> asyh = nv50_head_atom_get(asyw->state.state, asyw->state.crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
> index b92dc3461bbd..bb84e4d54a33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ wndwc37e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "qndw%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> index e2bae1424502..c32a8ca67f82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> @@ -558,13 +558,13 @@ nouveau_abi16_ioctl_notifierobj_alloc(ABI16_IOCTL_ARGS)
> if (drm->agp.bridge) {
> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_AGP;
> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
> - args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> - args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> + args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
> + args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
> } else {
> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_VM;
> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
> - args.start += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> - args.limit += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> + args.start += chan->ntfy->offset;
> + args.limit += chan->ntfy->offset;
> }
>
> client->route = NVDRM_OBJECT_ABI16;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index 2b4b21b02e40..ebf31035e1e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> index 38f9d8350963..e944b4aa5547 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct nouveau_bo {
> int pbbo_index;
> bool validate_mapped;
>
> + /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
> + uint64_t offset;
> +
> struct list_head vma_list;
>
> unsigned contig:1;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
> index d9381a053169..3d71dfcb2fde 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ nouveau_channel_prep(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nvif_device *device,
> * pushbuf lives in, this is because the GEM code requires that
> * we be able to call out to other (indirect) push buffers
> */
> - chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->bo.offset;
> + chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->offset;
>
> if (device->info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
> ret = nouveau_vma_new(chan->push.buffer, chan->vmm,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 0ad5d87b5a8e..475ed53b99f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long nouveau_dmem_page_addr(struct page *page)
> struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk = page->zone_device_data;
> unsigned long idx = page_to_pfn(page) - chunk->pfn_first;
>
> - return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->bo.offset;
> + return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->offset;
> }
>
> static void nouveau_dmem_page_free(struct page *page)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> index 0c5cdda3c336..508b118c0953 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>
> /* To allow resizeing without swapping buffers */
> NV_INFO(drm, "allocated %dx%d fb: 0x%llx, bo %p\n",
> - fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->bo.offset, nvbo);
> + fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->offset, nvbo);
>
> vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(dev->pdev, info);
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> index f5ece1f94973..cadff37eade8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ nouveau_gem_info(struct drm_file *file_priv, struct drm_gem_object *gem,
> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
> else
> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
> - rep->offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
> + rep->offset = nvbo->offset;
> if (vmm->vmm.object.oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_VMM_NV50) {
> vma = nouveau_vma_find(nvbo, vmm);
> if (!vma)
> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
> }
>
> if (drm->client.device.info.family < NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
> - if (nvbo->bo.offset == b->presumed.offset &&
> + if (nvbo->offset == b->presumed.offset &&
> ((nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
> b->presumed.domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) ||
> (nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
> else
> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
> - b->presumed.offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
> + b->presumed.offset = nvbo->offset;
> b->presumed.valid = 0;
> relocs++;
> }
> @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
> bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
>
> - OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
> + OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
> }
> } else {
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> }
>
> OUT_RING(chan, 0x20000000 |
> - (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset));
> + (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset));
> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
> for (j = 0; j < NOUVEAU_DMA_SKIPS; j++)
> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/8] drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:57 ` Alex Deucher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2020-02-17 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom, Gerd Hoffmann, Dave Airlie, kenny.ho,
brian.welty, Maling list - DRI developers, nirmoy.das,
VMware Graphics, amd-gfx list, Deucher, Alexander, Sean Paul,
Christian Koenig, Ben Skeggs
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Missing Acked or Reviewed prefix for Christian.
Alex
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++++-----
> 15 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
> index 1f08de4241e0..d06a93f2b38a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
> @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ nv04_crtc_do_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> fb = nouveau_framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb);
> }
>
> - nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
> + nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->offset;
>
> if (nv_crtc->lut.depth != drm_fb->format->depth) {
> nv_crtc->lut.depth = drm_fb->format->depth;
> @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ nv04_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv,
> nv04_cursor_upload(dev, cursor, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo);
>
> nouveau_bo_unmap(cursor);
> - nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset;
> + nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset;
> nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.offset);
> nv_crtc->cursor.show(nv_crtc, true);
> out:
> @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ nv04_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> /* Initialize a page flip struct */
> *s = (struct nv04_page_flip_state)
> { { }, event, crtc, fb->format->cpp[0] * 8, fb->pitches[0],
> - new_bo->bo.offset };
> + new_bo->offset };
>
> /* Keep vblanks on during flip, for the target crtc of this flip */
> drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> index 44ee82d0c9b6..89a4ddfcc55f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ nv04_display_init(struct drm_device *dev, bool resume, bool runtime)
> continue;
>
> if (nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset)
> - nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset);
> + nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset);
> nv_crtc->cursor.set_pos(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor_saved_x,
> nv_crtc->cursor_saved_y);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
> index a3a0a73ae8ab..9529bd9053e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> nvif_mask(dev, NV_PCRTC_ENGINE_CTRL + soff2, NV_CRTC_FSEL_OVERLAY, 0);
>
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BASE(flip), 0);
> - nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
> + nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_SIZE_IN(flip), src_h << 16 | src_w);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_POINT_IN(flip), src_y << 16 | src_x);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_DS_DX(flip), (src_w << 20) / crtc_w);
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> if (format & NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT_PLANAR) {
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_BASE(flip), 0);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_OFFSET_BUFF(flip),
> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset + fb->offsets[1]);
> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset + fb->offsets[1]);
> }
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT(flip), format | fb->pitches[0]);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_STOP, 0);
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ nv04_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>
> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_START_ADDRESS + 4 * i,
> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_PITCH_LENGTH + 4 * i,
> fb->pitches[0]);
> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_OFFSET + 4 * i, 0);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
> index 00a85f1e1a4a..67829f04b2c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ base507c_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, head, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "base%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> index e7fcfa6e6467..793dcb2ea196 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ core507d_new_(const struct nv50_core_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &core->chan);
> + disp->sync->offset, &core->chan);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "core%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
> index 8ccd96113bad..4cce1078140a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ovly507e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "ovly%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
> index 890315291b01..e90ffa4a5230 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ nv50_wndw_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_plane_state *state)
> }
>
> asyw->state.fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(fb->nvbo->bo.base.resv);
> - asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
> + asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->offset;
>
> if (wndw->func->prepare) {
> asyh = nv50_head_atom_get(asyw->state.state, asyw->state.crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
> index b92dc3461bbd..bb84e4d54a33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ wndwc37e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>
> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
> if (ret) {
> NV_ERROR(drm, "qndw%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> index e2bae1424502..c32a8ca67f82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
> @@ -558,13 +558,13 @@ nouveau_abi16_ioctl_notifierobj_alloc(ABI16_IOCTL_ARGS)
> if (drm->agp.bridge) {
> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_AGP;
> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
> - args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> - args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> + args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
> + args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
> } else {
> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_VM;
> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
> - args.start += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> - args.limit += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
> + args.start += chan->ntfy->offset;
> + args.limit += chan->ntfy->offset;
> }
>
> client->route = NVDRM_OBJECT_ABI16;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index 2b4b21b02e40..ebf31035e1e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> index 38f9d8350963..e944b4aa5547 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct nouveau_bo {
> int pbbo_index;
> bool validate_mapped;
>
> + /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
> + uint64_t offset;
> +
> struct list_head vma_list;
>
> unsigned contig:1;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
> index d9381a053169..3d71dfcb2fde 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ nouveau_channel_prep(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nvif_device *device,
> * pushbuf lives in, this is because the GEM code requires that
> * we be able to call out to other (indirect) push buffers
> */
> - chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->bo.offset;
> + chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->offset;
>
> if (device->info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
> ret = nouveau_vma_new(chan->push.buffer, chan->vmm,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 0ad5d87b5a8e..475ed53b99f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long nouveau_dmem_page_addr(struct page *page)
> struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk = page->zone_device_data;
> unsigned long idx = page_to_pfn(page) - chunk->pfn_first;
>
> - return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->bo.offset;
> + return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->offset;
> }
>
> static void nouveau_dmem_page_free(struct page *page)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> index 0c5cdda3c336..508b118c0953 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>
> /* To allow resizeing without swapping buffers */
> NV_INFO(drm, "allocated %dx%d fb: 0x%llx, bo %p\n",
> - fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->bo.offset, nvbo);
> + fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->offset, nvbo);
>
> vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(dev->pdev, info);
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> index f5ece1f94973..cadff37eade8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ nouveau_gem_info(struct drm_file *file_priv, struct drm_gem_object *gem,
> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
> else
> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
> - rep->offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
> + rep->offset = nvbo->offset;
> if (vmm->vmm.object.oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_VMM_NV50) {
> vma = nouveau_vma_find(nvbo, vmm);
> if (!vma)
> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
> }
>
> if (drm->client.device.info.family < NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
> - if (nvbo->bo.offset == b->presumed.offset &&
> + if (nvbo->offset == b->presumed.offset &&
> ((nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
> b->presumed.domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) ||
> (nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
> else
> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
> - b->presumed.offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
> + b->presumed.offset = nvbo->offset;
> b->presumed.valid = 0;
> relocs++;
> }
> @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
> bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
>
> - OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
> + OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
> }
> } else {
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> }
>
> OUT_RING(chan, 0x20000000 |
> - (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset));
> + (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset));
> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
> for (j = 0; j < NOUVEAU_DMA_SKIPS; j++)
> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/8] drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:57 ` Alex Deucher
@ 2020-02-17 16:04 ` Nirmoy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-17 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Deucher, Nirmoy Das
Cc: Chunming Zhou, Thomas Hellstrom, Gerd Hoffmann, Dave Airlie,
kenny.ho, brian.welty, Maarten Lankhorst,
Maling list - DRI developers, nirmoy.das, VMware Graphics,
amd-gfx list, Daniel Vetter, Deucher, Alexander, Sean Paul,
Christian Koenig, Ben Skeggs
On 2/17/20 4:57 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>> Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Missing Acked or Reviewed prefix for Christian.
:facepalm: Thanks Alex.
Nirmoy
>
> Alex
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 ++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 15 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
>> index 1f08de4241e0..d06a93f2b38a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
>> @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ nv04_crtc_do_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> fb = nouveau_framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb);
>> }
>>
>> - nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->offset;
>>
>> if (nv_crtc->lut.depth != drm_fb->format->depth) {
>> nv_crtc->lut.depth = drm_fb->format->depth;
>> @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ nv04_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv,
>> nv04_cursor_upload(dev, cursor, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo);
>>
>> nouveau_bo_unmap(cursor);
>> - nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset;
>> nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.offset);
>> nv_crtc->cursor.show(nv_crtc, true);
>> out:
>> @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ nv04_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>> /* Initialize a page flip struct */
>> *s = (struct nv04_page_flip_state)
>> { { }, event, crtc, fb->format->cpp[0] * 8, fb->pitches[0],
>> - new_bo->bo.offset };
>> + new_bo->offset };
>>
>> /* Keep vblanks on during flip, for the target crtc of this flip */
>> drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
>> index 44ee82d0c9b6..89a4ddfcc55f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
>> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ nv04_display_init(struct drm_device *dev, bool resume, bool runtime)
>> continue;
>>
>> if (nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset)
>> - nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset);
>> + nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset);
>> nv_crtc->cursor.set_pos(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor_saved_x,
>> nv_crtc->cursor_saved_y);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
>> index a3a0a73ae8ab..9529bd9053e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
>> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> nvif_mask(dev, NV_PCRTC_ENGINE_CTRL + soff2, NV_CRTC_FSEL_OVERLAY, 0);
>>
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BASE(flip), 0);
>> - nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
>> + nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_SIZE_IN(flip), src_h << 16 | src_w);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_POINT_IN(flip), src_y << 16 | src_x);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_DS_DX(flip), (src_w << 20) / crtc_w);
>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> if (format & NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT_PLANAR) {
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_BASE(flip), 0);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_OFFSET_BUFF(flip),
>> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset + fb->offsets[1]);
>> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset + fb->offsets[1]);
>> }
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT(flip), format | fb->pitches[0]);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_STOP, 0);
>> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ nv04_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_START_ADDRESS + 4 * i,
>> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
>> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_PITCH_LENGTH + 4 * i,
>> fb->pitches[0]);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_OFFSET + 4 * i, 0);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
>> index 00a85f1e1a4a..67829f04b2c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ base507c_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, head, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "base%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
>> index e7fcfa6e6467..793dcb2ea196 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
>> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ core507d_new_(const struct nv50_core_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &core->chan);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &core->chan);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "core%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
>> index 8ccd96113bad..4cce1078140a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
>> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ovly507e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "ovly%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
>> index 890315291b01..e90ffa4a5230 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
>> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ nv50_wndw_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_plane_state *state)
>> }
>>
>> asyw->state.fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(fb->nvbo->bo.base.resv);
>> - asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->offset;
>>
>> if (wndw->func->prepare) {
>> asyh = nv50_head_atom_get(asyw->state.state, asyw->state.crtc);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
>> index b92dc3461bbd..bb84e4d54a33 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
>> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ wndwc37e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "qndw%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
>> index e2bae1424502..c32a8ca67f82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
>> @@ -558,13 +558,13 @@ nouveau_abi16_ioctl_notifierobj_alloc(ABI16_IOCTL_ARGS)
>> if (drm->agp.bridge) {
>> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_AGP;
>> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
>> - args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> - args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> + args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
>> + args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
>> } else {
>> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_VM;
>> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
>> - args.start += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> - args.limit += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> + args.start += chan->ntfy->offset;
>> + args.limit += chan->ntfy->offset;
>> }
>>
>> client->route = NVDRM_OBJECT_ABI16;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index 2b4b21b02e40..ebf31035e1e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
>> index 38f9d8350963..e944b4aa5547 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct nouveau_bo {
>> int pbbo_index;
>> bool validate_mapped;
>>
>> + /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
>> + uint64_t offset;
>> +
>> struct list_head vma_list;
>>
>> unsigned contig:1;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
>> index d9381a053169..3d71dfcb2fde 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ nouveau_channel_prep(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nvif_device *device,
>> * pushbuf lives in, this is because the GEM code requires that
>> * we be able to call out to other (indirect) push buffers
>> */
>> - chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->bo.offset;
>> + chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->offset;
>>
>> if (device->info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
>> ret = nouveau_vma_new(chan->push.buffer, chan->vmm,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> index 0ad5d87b5a8e..475ed53b99f1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long nouveau_dmem_page_addr(struct page *page)
>> struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk = page->zone_device_data;
>> unsigned long idx = page_to_pfn(page) - chunk->pfn_first;
>>
>> - return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->bo.offset;
>> + return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->offset;
>> }
>>
>> static void nouveau_dmem_page_free(struct page *page)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
>> index 0c5cdda3c336..508b118c0953 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>>
>> /* To allow resizeing without swapping buffers */
>> NV_INFO(drm, "allocated %dx%d fb: 0x%llx, bo %p\n",
>> - fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->bo.offset, nvbo);
>> + fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->offset, nvbo);
>>
>> vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(dev->pdev, info);
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
>> index f5ece1f94973..cadff37eade8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ nouveau_gem_info(struct drm_file *file_priv, struct drm_gem_object *gem,
>> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
>> else
>> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
>> - rep->offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + rep->offset = nvbo->offset;
>> if (vmm->vmm.object.oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_VMM_NV50) {
>> vma = nouveau_vma_find(nvbo, vmm);
>> if (!vma)
>> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
>> }
>>
>> if (drm->client.device.info.family < NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
>> - if (nvbo->bo.offset == b->presumed.offset &&
>> + if (nvbo->offset == b->presumed.offset &&
>> ((nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
>> b->presumed.domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) ||
>> (nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
>> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
>> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
>> else
>> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
>> - b->presumed.offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + b->presumed.offset = nvbo->offset;
>> b->presumed.valid = 0;
>> relocs++;
>> }
>> @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
>> bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
>>
>> - OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
>> + OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
>> }
>> } else {
>> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> }
>>
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0x20000000 |
>> - (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset));
>> + (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset));
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
>> for (j = 0; j < NOUVEAU_DMA_SKIPS; j++)
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
>> --
>> 2.25.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cnirmoy.das%40amd.com%7C61fe524a09c64a10891d08d7b3c221a8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637175518684441041&sdata=oHp63aoK9vbCtKA89jXhIO%2FRyzj9uNkLl2NTPk5waig%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/8] drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-17 16:04 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-17 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Deucher, Nirmoy Das
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom, Gerd Hoffmann, Dave Airlie, kenny.ho,
brian.welty, Maling list - DRI developers, nirmoy.das,
VMware Graphics, amd-gfx list, Deucher, Alexander, Sean Paul,
Christian Koenig, Ben Skeggs
On 2/17/20 4:57 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Store ttm bo->offset in struct nouveau_bo instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>> Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Missing Acked or Reviewed prefix for Christian.
:facepalm: Thanks Alex.
Nirmoy
>
> Alex
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 ++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 15 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
>> index 1f08de4241e0..d06a93f2b38a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c
>> @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ nv04_crtc_do_mode_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> fb = nouveau_framebuffer(crtc->primary->fb);
>> }
>>
>> - nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + nv_crtc->fb.offset = fb->nvbo->offset;
>>
>> if (nv_crtc->lut.depth != drm_fb->format->depth) {
>> nv_crtc->lut.depth = drm_fb->format->depth;
>> @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ nv04_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv,
>> nv04_cursor_upload(dev, cursor, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo);
>>
>> nouveau_bo_unmap(cursor);
>> - nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + nv_crtc->cursor.offset = nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset;
>> nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.offset);
>> nv_crtc->cursor.show(nv_crtc, true);
>> out:
>> @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@ nv04_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>> /* Initialize a page flip struct */
>> *s = (struct nv04_page_flip_state)
>> { { }, event, crtc, fb->format->cpp[0] * 8, fb->pitches[0],
>> - new_bo->bo.offset };
>> + new_bo->offset };
>>
>> /* Keep vblanks on during flip, for the target crtc of this flip */
>> drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
>> index 44ee82d0c9b6..89a4ddfcc55f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c
>> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ nv04_display_init(struct drm_device *dev, bool resume, bool runtime)
>> continue;
>>
>> if (nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset)
>> - nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->bo.offset);
>> + nv_crtc->cursor.set_offset(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor.nvbo->offset);
>> nv_crtc->cursor.set_pos(nv_crtc, nv_crtc->cursor_saved_x,
>> nv_crtc->cursor_saved_y);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
>> index a3a0a73ae8ab..9529bd9053e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c
>> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> nvif_mask(dev, NV_PCRTC_ENGINE_CTRL + soff2, NV_CRTC_FSEL_OVERLAY, 0);
>>
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BASE(flip), 0);
>> - nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
>> + nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_OFFSET_BUFF(flip), nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_SIZE_IN(flip), src_h << 16 | src_w);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_POINT_IN(flip), src_y << 16 | src_x);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_DS_DX(flip), (src_w << 20) / crtc_w);
>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ nv10_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> if (format & NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT_PLANAR) {
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_BASE(flip), 0);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_OFFSET_BUFF(flip),
>> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset + fb->offsets[1]);
>> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset + fb->offsets[1]);
>> }
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_FORMAT(flip), format | fb->pitches[0]);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_STOP, 0);
>> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ nv04_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_START_ADDRESS + 4 * i,
>> - nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset);
>> + nv_fb->nvbo->offset);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_PITCH_LENGTH + 4 * i,
>> fb->pitches[0]);
>> nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_BUFF0_OFFSET + 4 * i, 0);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
>> index 00a85f1e1a4a..67829f04b2c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ base507c_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, head, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "base%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
>> index e7fcfa6e6467..793dcb2ea196 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
>> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ core507d_new_(const struct nv50_core_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &core->chan);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &core->chan);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "core%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
>> index 8ccd96113bad..4cce1078140a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c
>> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ovly507e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, const u32 *format,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "ovly%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
>> index 890315291b01..e90ffa4a5230 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
>> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ nv50_wndw_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_plane_state *state)
>> }
>>
>> asyw->state.fence = dma_resv_get_excl_rcu(fb->nvbo->bo.base.resv);
>> - asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + asyw->image.offset[0] = fb->nvbo->offset;
>>
>> if (wndw->func->prepare) {
>> asyh = nv50_head_atom_get(asyw->state.state, asyw->state.crtc);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
>> index b92dc3461bbd..bb84e4d54a33 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c
>> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ wndwc37e_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>>
>> ret = nv50_dmac_create(&drm->client.device, &disp->disp->object,
>> &oclass, 0, &args, sizeof(args),
>> - disp->sync->bo.offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> + disp->sync->offset, &wndw->wndw);
>> if (ret) {
>> NV_ERROR(drm, "qndw%04x allocation failed: %d\n", oclass, ret);
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
>> index e2bae1424502..c32a8ca67f82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c
>> @@ -558,13 +558,13 @@ nouveau_abi16_ioctl_notifierobj_alloc(ABI16_IOCTL_ARGS)
>> if (drm->agp.bridge) {
>> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_AGP;
>> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
>> - args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> - args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> + args.start += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
>> + args.limit += drm->agp.base + chan->ntfy->offset;
>> } else {
>> args.target = NV_DMA_V0_TARGET_VM;
>> args.access = NV_DMA_V0_ACCESS_RDWR;
>> - args.start += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> - args.limit += chan->ntfy->bo.offset;
>> + args.start += chan->ntfy->offset;
>> + args.limit += chan->ntfy->offset;
>> }
>>
>> client->route = NVDRM_OBJECT_ABI16;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index 2b4b21b02e40..ebf31035e1e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
>> index 38f9d8350963..e944b4aa5547 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ struct nouveau_bo {
>> int pbbo_index;
>> bool validate_mapped;
>>
>> + /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
>> + uint64_t offset;
>> +
>> struct list_head vma_list;
>>
>> unsigned contig:1;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
>> index d9381a053169..3d71dfcb2fde 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ nouveau_channel_prep(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nvif_device *device,
>> * pushbuf lives in, this is because the GEM code requires that
>> * we be able to call out to other (indirect) push buffers
>> */
>> - chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->bo.offset;
>> + chan->push.addr = chan->push.buffer->offset;
>>
>> if (device->info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
>> ret = nouveau_vma_new(chan->push.buffer, chan->vmm,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> index 0ad5d87b5a8e..475ed53b99f1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long nouveau_dmem_page_addr(struct page *page)
>> struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk = page->zone_device_data;
>> unsigned long idx = page_to_pfn(page) - chunk->pfn_first;
>>
>> - return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->bo.offset;
>> + return (idx << PAGE_SHIFT) + chunk->bo->offset;
>> }
>>
>> static void nouveau_dmem_page_free(struct page *page)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
>> index 0c5cdda3c336..508b118c0953 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
>> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>>
>> /* To allow resizeing without swapping buffers */
>> NV_INFO(drm, "allocated %dx%d fb: 0x%llx, bo %p\n",
>> - fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->bo.offset, nvbo);
>> + fb->base.width, fb->base.height, fb->nvbo->offset, nvbo);
>>
>> vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set(dev->pdev, info);
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
>> index f5ece1f94973..cadff37eade8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ nouveau_gem_info(struct drm_file *file_priv, struct drm_gem_object *gem,
>> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
>> else
>> rep->domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
>> - rep->offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + rep->offset = nvbo->offset;
>> if (vmm->vmm.object.oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_VMM_NV50) {
>> vma = nouveau_vma_find(nvbo, vmm);
>> if (!vma)
>> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
>> }
>>
>> if (drm->client.device.info.family < NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
>> - if (nvbo->bo.offset == b->presumed.offset &&
>> + if (nvbo->offset == b->presumed.offset &&
>> ((nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
>> b->presumed.domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) ||
>> (nvbo->bo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
>> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ validate_list(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_cli *cli,
>> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_GART;
>> else
>> b->presumed.domain = NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
>> - b->presumed.offset = nvbo->bo.offset;
>> + b->presumed.offset = nvbo->offset;
>> b->presumed.valid = 0;
>> relocs++;
>> }
>> @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
>> bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
>>
>> - OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
>> + OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
>> }
>> } else {
>> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> }
>>
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0x20000000 |
>> - (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset));
>> + (nvbo->offset + push[i].offset));
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
>> for (j = 0; j < NOUVEAU_DMA_SKIPS; j++)
>> OUT_RING(chan, 0);
>> --
>> 2.25.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cnirmoy.das%40amd.com%7C61fe524a09c64a10891d08d7b3c221a8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637175518684441041&sdata=oHp63aoK9vbCtKA89jXhIO%2FRyzj9uNkLl2NTPk5waig%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/8] drm/qxl: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, christian.koenig,
kraxel
This patch also removes slot->gpu_offset which is not required as
VRAM and PRIV slot are in separate PCI bar
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 6 ++----
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 5 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 5 -----
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 9 ---------
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h
index 27e45a2d6b52..df581f0e6699 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h
@@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ struct qxl_memslot {
uint64_t start_phys_addr;
uint64_t size;
uint64_t high_bits;
- uint64_t gpu_offset;
};
enum {
@@ -311,10 +310,9 @@ qxl_bo_physical_address(struct qxl_device *qdev, struct qxl_bo *bo,
(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM)
? &qdev->main_slot : &qdev->surfaces_slot;
- WARN_ON_ONCE((bo->tbo.offset & slot->gpu_offset) != slot->gpu_offset);
+ /* TODO - need to hold one of the locks to read bo->tbo.mem.start */
- /* TODO - need to hold one of the locks to read tbo.offset */
- return slot->high_bits | (bo->tbo.offset - slot->gpu_offset + offset);
+ return slot->high_bits | ((bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset);
}
/* qxl_display.c */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c
index 70b20ee4741a..7a5bf544f34d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c
@@ -86,11 +86,10 @@ static void setup_slot(struct qxl_device *qdev,
high_bits <<= (64 - (qdev->rom->slot_gen_bits + qdev->rom->slot_id_bits));
slot->high_bits = high_bits;
- DRM_INFO("slot %d (%s): base 0x%08lx, size 0x%08lx, gpu_offset 0x%lx\n",
+ DRM_INFO("slot %d (%s): base 0x%08lx, size 0x%08lx\n",
slot->index, slot->name,
(unsigned long)slot->start_phys_addr,
- (unsigned long)slot->size,
- (unsigned long)slot->gpu_offset);
+ (unsigned long)slot->size);
}
void qxl_reinit_memslots(struct qxl_device *qdev)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h
index 8ae54ba7857c..21fa81048f4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h
@@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ static inline void qxl_bo_unreserve(struct qxl_bo *bo)
ttm_bo_unreserve(&bo->tbo);
}
-static inline u64 qxl_bo_gpu_offset(struct qxl_bo *bo)
-{
- return bo->tbo.offset;
-}
-
static inline unsigned long qxl_bo_size(struct qxl_bo *bo)
{
return bo->tbo.num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c
index 62a5e424971b..635d000e7934 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c
@@ -51,11 +51,6 @@ static struct qxl_device *qxl_get_qdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
static int qxl_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man)
{
- struct qxl_device *qdev = qxl_get_qdev(bdev);
- unsigned int gpu_offset_shift =
- 64 - (qdev->rom->slot_gen_bits + qdev->rom->slot_id_bits + 8);
- struct qxl_memslot *slot;
-
switch (type) {
case TTM_PL_SYSTEM:
/* System memory */
@@ -66,11 +61,7 @@ static int qxl_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
case TTM_PL_PRIV:
/* "On-card" video ram */
- slot = (type == TTM_PL_VRAM) ?
- &qdev->main_slot : &qdev->surfaces_slot;
- slot->gpu_offset = (uint64_t)type << gpu_offset_shift;
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = slot->gpu_offset;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/8] drm/qxl: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
This patch also removes slot->gpu_offset which is not required as
VRAM and PRIV slot are in separate PCI bar
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 6 ++----
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 5 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 5 -----
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 9 ---------
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h
index 27e45a2d6b52..df581f0e6699 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h
@@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ struct qxl_memslot {
uint64_t start_phys_addr;
uint64_t size;
uint64_t high_bits;
- uint64_t gpu_offset;
};
enum {
@@ -311,10 +310,9 @@ qxl_bo_physical_address(struct qxl_device *qdev, struct qxl_bo *bo,
(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM)
? &qdev->main_slot : &qdev->surfaces_slot;
- WARN_ON_ONCE((bo->tbo.offset & slot->gpu_offset) != slot->gpu_offset);
+ /* TODO - need to hold one of the locks to read bo->tbo.mem.start */
- /* TODO - need to hold one of the locks to read tbo.offset */
- return slot->high_bits | (bo->tbo.offset - slot->gpu_offset + offset);
+ return slot->high_bits | ((bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset);
}
/* qxl_display.c */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c
index 70b20ee4741a..7a5bf544f34d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c
@@ -86,11 +86,10 @@ static void setup_slot(struct qxl_device *qdev,
high_bits <<= (64 - (qdev->rom->slot_gen_bits + qdev->rom->slot_id_bits));
slot->high_bits = high_bits;
- DRM_INFO("slot %d (%s): base 0x%08lx, size 0x%08lx, gpu_offset 0x%lx\n",
+ DRM_INFO("slot %d (%s): base 0x%08lx, size 0x%08lx\n",
slot->index, slot->name,
(unsigned long)slot->start_phys_addr,
- (unsigned long)slot->size,
- (unsigned long)slot->gpu_offset);
+ (unsigned long)slot->size);
}
void qxl_reinit_memslots(struct qxl_device *qdev)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h
index 8ae54ba7857c..21fa81048f4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h
@@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ static inline void qxl_bo_unreserve(struct qxl_bo *bo)
ttm_bo_unreserve(&bo->tbo);
}
-static inline u64 qxl_bo_gpu_offset(struct qxl_bo *bo)
-{
- return bo->tbo.offset;
-}
-
static inline unsigned long qxl_bo_size(struct qxl_bo *bo)
{
return bo->tbo.num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c
index 62a5e424971b..635d000e7934 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c
@@ -51,11 +51,6 @@ static struct qxl_device *qxl_get_qdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
static int qxl_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man)
{
- struct qxl_device *qdev = qxl_get_qdev(bdev);
- unsigned int gpu_offset_shift =
- 64 - (qdev->rom->slot_gen_bits + qdev->rom->slot_id_bits + 8);
- struct qxl_memslot *slot;
-
switch (type) {
case TTM_PL_SYSTEM:
/* System memory */
@@ -66,11 +61,7 @@ static int qxl_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
case TTM_PL_PRIV:
/* "On-card" video ram */
- slot = (type == TTM_PL_VRAM) ?
- &qdev->main_slot : &qdev->surfaces_slot;
- slot->gpu_offset = (uint64_t)type << gpu_offset_shift;
man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
- man->gpu_offset = slot->gpu_offset;
man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6/8] drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, christian.koenig,
kraxel
Calculate GPU offset within vram-helper without depending on
bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
index 92a11bb42365..e7ef4cd8116d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ s64 drm_gem_vram_offset(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo)
{
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!gbo->pin_count))
return (s64)-ENODEV;
- return gbo->bo.offset;
+ return gbo->bo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_offset);
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6/8] drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
Calculate GPU offset within vram-helper without depending on
bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
index 92a11bb42365..e7ef4cd8116d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ s64 drm_gem_vram_offset(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo)
{
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!gbo->pin_count))
return (s64)-ENODEV;
- return gbo->bo.offset;
+ return gbo->bo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_offset);
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6/8] drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-24 8:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2020-02-24 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, amd-gfx, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, dri-devel, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher,
sean, christian.koenig
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:04:25PM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Calculate GPU offset within vram-helper without depending on
> bo->offset
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6/8] drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
@ 2020-02-24 8:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2020-02-24 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das
Cc: thellstrom, amd-gfx, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, dri-devel,
nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher,
sean, christian.koenig
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:04:25PM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Calculate GPU offset within vram-helper without depending on
> bo->offset
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6/8] drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
2020-02-24 8:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
(?)
@ 2020-02-24 9:52 ` Nirmoy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-24 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerd Hoffmann; +Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Gerd,
This is old one can you please review v3
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2020-February/255760.html
Regards,
Nirmoy
On 2/24/20 9:01 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:04:25PM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>> Calculate GPU offset within vram-helper without depending on
>> bo->offset
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7/8] drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, christian.koenig,
kraxel
Switch over to GEM VRAM's implementation to retrieve bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
index 8066d7d370d5..b8e1079f077e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void bochs_plane_update(struct bochs_device *bochs,
state->crtc_x,
state->crtc_y,
state->fb->pitches[0],
- state->fb->offsets[0] + gbo->bo.offset);
+ state->fb->offsets[0] + drm_gem_vram_offset(gbo));
bochs_hw_setformat(bochs, state->fb->format);
}
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7/8] drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
Switch over to GEM VRAM's implementation to retrieve bo->offset
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
index 8066d7d370d5..b8e1079f077e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void bochs_plane_update(struct bochs_device *bochs,
state->crtc_x,
state->crtc_y,
state->fb->pitches[0],
- state->fb->offsets[0] + gbo->bo.offset);
+ state->fb->offsets[0] + drm_gem_vram_offset(gbo));
bochs_hw_setformat(bochs, state->fb->format);
}
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:06 ` Christian König
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-17 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
kraxel, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, bskeggs
Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> Switch over to GEM VRAM's implementation to retrieve bo->offset
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
> index 8066d7d370d5..b8e1079f077e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void bochs_plane_update(struct bochs_device *bochs,
> state->crtc_x,
> state->crtc_y,
> state->fb->pitches[0],
> - state->fb->offsets[0] + gbo->bo.offset);
> + state->fb->offsets[0] + drm_gem_vram_offset(gbo));
> bochs_hw_setformat(bochs, state->fb->format);
> }
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
@ 2020-02-17 15:06 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-17 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, kraxel, alexander.deucher, sean,
bskeggs
Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> Switch over to GEM VRAM's implementation to retrieve bo->offset
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
> index 8066d7d370d5..b8e1079f077e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void bochs_plane_update(struct bochs_device *bochs,
> state->crtc_x,
> state->crtc_y,
> state->fb->pitches[0],
> - state->fb->offsets[0] + gbo->bo.offset);
> + state->fb->offsets[0] + drm_gem_vram_offset(gbo));
> bochs_hw_setformat(bochs, state->fb->format);
> }
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-24 8:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2020-02-24 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, amd-gfx, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, dri-devel, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher,
sean, christian.koenig
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:04:26PM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Switch over to GEM VRAM's implementation to retrieve bo->offset
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
@ 2020-02-24 8:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2020-02-24 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das
Cc: thellstrom, amd-gfx, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, dri-devel,
nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher,
sean, christian.koenig
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:04:26PM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Switch over to GEM VRAM's implementation to retrieve bo->offset
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: David1.Zhou, thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty,
maarten.lankhorst, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer,
bskeggs, daniel, alexander.deucher, sean, christian.koenig,
kraxel
GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its device
driver.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
- drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->available_caching);
drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->default_caching);
@@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
moved:
bo->evicted = false;
- if (bo->mem.mm_node)
- bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
- bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
- else
- bo->offset = 0;
-
ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
return 0;
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
@@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
* either of these locks held.
*/
- uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
-
struct sg_table *sg;
};
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
bool has_type;
bool use_type;
uint32_t flags;
- uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
uint64_t size;
uint32_t available_caching;
uint32_t default_caching;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy Das @ 2020-02-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its device
driver.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
- drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->available_caching);
drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->default_caching);
@@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
moved:
bo->evicted = false;
- if (bo->mem.mm_node)
- bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
- bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
- else
- bo->offset = 0;
-
ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
return 0;
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
@@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
* either of these locks held.
*/
- uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
-
struct sg_table *sg;
};
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
bool has_type;
bool use_type;
uint32_t flags;
- uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
uint64_t size;
uint32_t available_caching;
uint32_t default_caching;
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-18 12:40 ` Thomas Zimmermann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2710 bytes --]
Hi
Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its device
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->available_caching);
> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->default_caching);
> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> moved:
> bo->evicted = false;
>
> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
> - else
> - bo->offset = 0;
> -
After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
Best regards
Thomas
> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
> * either of these locks held.
> */
>
> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
> -
> struct sg_table *sg;
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
> bool has_type;
> bool use_type;
> uint32_t flags;
> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
> uint64_t size;
> uint32_t available_caching;
> uint32_t default_caching;
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 12:40 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2710 bytes --]
Hi
Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its device
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->available_caching);
> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->default_caching);
> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> moved:
> bo->evicted = false;
>
> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
> - else
> - bo->offset = 0;
> -
After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
Best regards
Thomas
> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
> * either of these locks held.
> */
>
> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
> -
> struct sg_table *sg;
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
> bool has_type;
> bool use_type;
> uint32_t flags;
> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
> uint64_t size;
> uint32_t available_caching;
> uint32_t default_caching;
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
2020-02-18 12:40 ` Thomas Zimmermann
@ 2020-02-18 12:44 ` Christian König
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
kraxel
Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its device
>> driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->available_caching);
>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->default_caching);
>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> moved:
>> bo->evicted = false;
>>
>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>> - else
>> - bo->offset = 0;
>> -
> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the system
domain here.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> return 0;
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>> * either of these locks held.
>> */
>>
>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
>> -
>> struct sg_table *sg;
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>> bool has_type;
>> bool use_type;
>> uint32_t flags;
>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
>> uint64_t size;
>> uint32_t available_caching;
>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 12:44 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
kraxel
Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its device
>> driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->available_caching);
>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n", man->default_caching);
>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> moved:
>> bo->evicted = false;
>>
>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>> - else
>> - bo->offset = 0;
>> -
> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the system
domain here.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> return 0;
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>> * either of these locks held.
>> */
>>
>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
>> -
>> struct sg_table *sg;
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>> bool has_type;
>> bool use_type;
>> uint32_t flags;
>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU word size */
>> uint64_t size;
>> uint32_t available_caching;
>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 17:13 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>> device
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>> man->available_caching);
>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>> man->default_caching);
>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> moved:
>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>> - else
>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>> -
>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>
> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>
> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>
> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
> system domain here.
I wonder how to verify that ?
If I understand correctly:
1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
system domain.
2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
vmwgfx should be fine.
4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
*bo, bool evict,
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
}
+ if (bo->mem.mm_node)
+ nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ else
+ nvbo->offset = 0;
} else {
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> return 0;
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>> * either of these locks held.
>>> */
>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>> word size */
>>> -
>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>> bool has_type;
>>> bool use_type;
>>> uint32_t flags;
>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>> word size */
>>> uint64_t size;
>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 17:13 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>> device
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>> man->available_caching);
>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>> man->default_caching);
>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> moved:
>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>> - else
>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>> -
>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>
> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>
> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>
> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
> system domain here.
I wonder how to verify that ?
If I understand correctly:
1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
system domain.
2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
vmwgfx should be fine.
4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
*bo, bool evict,
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
}
+ if (bo->mem.mm_node)
+ nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ else
+ nvbo->offset = 0;
} else {
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> return 0;
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>> * either of these locks held.
>>> */
>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>> word size */
>>> -
>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>> bool has_type;
>>> bool use_type;
>>> uint32_t flags;
>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>> word size */
>>> uint64_t size;
>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 17:13 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>> device
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>> man->available_caching);
>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>> man->default_caching);
>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> moved:
>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>> - else
>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>> -
>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>
> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>
> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>
> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
> system domain here.
I wonder how to verify that ?
If I understand correctly:
1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
system domain.
2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
vmwgfx should be fine.
4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
*bo, bool evict,
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
}
+ if (bo->mem.mm_node)
+ nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ else
+ nvbo->offset = 0;
} else {
list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> return 0;
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>> * either of these locks held.
>>> */
>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>> word size */
>>> -
>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>> bool has_type;
>>> bool use_type;
>>> uint32_t flags;
>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>> word size */
>>> uint64_t size;
>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 17:23 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy, Christian König, Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>
> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>> device
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>> moved:
>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>> - else
>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>> -
>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>
>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>
>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get
>> the GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>
>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>> system domain here.
>
> I wonder how to verify that ?
No idea, but I wouldn't worry to much about that.
>
> If I understand correctly:
>
> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not
> in system domain.
>
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>
> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> vmwgfx should be fine.
>
> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
That sounds like those four are ok to me.
>
> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>
> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + else
> + nvbo->offset = 0;
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
Yeah, I would go down that route.
Christian.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>> */
>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> -
>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>> bool has_type;
>>>> bool use_type;
>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of
>>>> CPU word size */
>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 17:23 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy, Christian König, Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>
> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>> device
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>> moved:
>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>> - else
>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>> -
>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>
>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>
>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get
>> the GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>
>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>> system domain here.
>
> I wonder how to verify that ?
No idea, but I wouldn't worry to much about that.
>
> If I understand correctly:
>
> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not
> in system domain.
>
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>
> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> vmwgfx should be fine.
>
> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
That sounds like those four are ok to me.
>
> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>
> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + else
> + nvbo->offset = 0;
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
Yeah, I would go down that route.
Christian.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>> */
>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> -
>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>> bool has_type;
>>>> bool use_type;
>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of
>>>> CPU word size */
>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 17:23 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy, Christian König, Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>
> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>> device
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>> moved:
>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>> - else
>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>> -
>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>
>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>
>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get
>> the GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>
>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>> system domain here.
>
> I wonder how to verify that ?
No idea, but I wouldn't worry to much about that.
>
> If I understand correctly:
>
> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not
> in system domain.
>
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>
> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> vmwgfx should be fine.
>
> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
That sounds like those four are ok to me.
>
> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>
> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + else
> + nvbo->offset = 0;
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
Yeah, I would go down that route.
Christian.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>> */
>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> -
>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>> bool has_type;
>>>> bool use_type;
>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of
>>>> CPU word size */
>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:16 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy, Christian König, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5965 bytes --]
Hi
Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>
> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>> device
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>> moved:
>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>> - else
>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>> -
>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>
>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>
>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>
>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>> system domain here.
>
> I wonder how to verify that ?
>
> If I understand correctly:
>
> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
> system domain.
>
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>
> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> vmwgfx should be fine.
>
> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>
> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>
> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
and use it everywhere. Something like
s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
{
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
return 0;
return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
}
Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + else
> + nvbo->offset = 0;
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>> */
>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> -
>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>> bool has_type;
>>>> bool use_type;
>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:16 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy, Christian König, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5965 bytes --]
Hi
Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>
> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>> device
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>> moved:
>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>> - else
>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>> -
>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>
>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>
>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>
>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>> system domain here.
>
> I wonder how to verify that ?
>
> If I understand correctly:
>
> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
> system domain.
>
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>
> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> vmwgfx should be fine.
>
> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>
> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>
> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
and use it everywhere. Something like
s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
{
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
return 0;
return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
}
Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + else
> + nvbo->offset = 0;
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>> */
>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> -
>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>> bool has_type;
>>>> bool use_type;
>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:16 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy, Christian König, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6014 bytes --]
Hi
Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>
> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>> device
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>> moved:
>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>> - else
>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>> -
>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>
>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>
>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>
>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>> system domain here.
>
> I wonder how to verify that ?
>
> If I understand correctly:
>
> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
> system domain.
>
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>
> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> vmwgfx should be fine.
>
> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>
> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>
> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
and use it everywhere. Something like
s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
{
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
return 0;
return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
}
Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo, bool evict,
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> }
> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + else
> + nvbo->offset = 0;
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>> */
>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> -
>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>> bool has_type;
>>>> bool use_type;
>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>> word size */
>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 182 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:23 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>> device
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>> moved:
>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>
>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>
>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>> system domain here.
>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>
>> If I understand correctly:
>>
>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>> system domain.
>>
>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>
>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>
>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>
>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>
>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> and use it everywhere. Something like
>
> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> return 0;
> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
we work with page or byte offsets.
For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + else
>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> -
>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:23 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>> device
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>> moved:
>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>
>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>
>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>> system domain here.
>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>
>> If I understand correctly:
>>
>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>> system domain.
>>
>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>
>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>
>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>
>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>
>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> and use it everywhere. Something like
>
> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> return 0;
> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
we work with page or byte offsets.
For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + else
>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> -
>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:23 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>> device
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>> moved:
>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>
>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>
>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>> system domain here.
>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>
>> If I understand correctly:
>>
>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>> system domain.
>>
>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>
>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>
>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>
>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>
>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> and use it everywhere. Something like
>
> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> return 0;
> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
we work with page or byte offsets.
For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + else
>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> -
>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:28 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7143 bytes --]
Hi
Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>> device
>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>> - else
>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>> -
>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>
>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>
>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>> system domain here.
>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>
>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>> system domain.
>>>
>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>
>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>
>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>
>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>
>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>
>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>> {
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>> return 0;
>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> }
>>
>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>
> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>
> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
> we work with page or byte offsets.
>
> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>> }
>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>> + else
>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>> } else {
>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Nirmoy
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:28 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7143 bytes --]
Hi
Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>> device
>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>> - else
>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>> -
>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>
>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>
>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>> system domain here.
>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>
>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>> system domain.
>>>
>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>
>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>
>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>
>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>
>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>
>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>> {
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>> return 0;
>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> }
>>
>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>
> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>
> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
> we work with page or byte offsets.
>
> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>> }
>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>> + else
>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>> } else {
>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Nirmoy
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:28 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7220 bytes --]
Hi
Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>> device
>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>> - else
>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>> -
>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>
>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>
>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>> system domain here.
>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>
>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>> system domain.
>>>
>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>
>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>
>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>
>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>
>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>
>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>> {
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>> return 0;
>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> }
>>
>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>
> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>
> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
> we work with page or byte offsets.
>
> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>> }
>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>> + else
>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>> } else {
>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Nirmoy
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>> dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 182 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:37 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Christian König, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7462 bytes --]
Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>>> system domain here.
>>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>>
>>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>>
>>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>>> system domain.
>>>>
>>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>>
>>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>>
>>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>>
>>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>>
>>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>> {
>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>>> return 0;
>>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>>
>> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
>> we work with page or byte offsets.
>>
>> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
>> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
> OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
> shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and
put it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon
and nouveau would still need a separate function.
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>>> }
>>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>> + else
>>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>>> } else {
>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9757 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:37 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Christian König, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7462 bytes --]
Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>>> system domain here.
>>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>>
>>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>>
>>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>>> system domain.
>>>>
>>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>>
>>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>>
>>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>>
>>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>>
>>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>> {
>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>>> return 0;
>>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>>
>> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
>> we work with page or byte offsets.
>>
>> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
>> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
> OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
> shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and
put it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon
and nouveau would still need a separate function.
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>>> }
>>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>> + else
>>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>>> } else {
>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9757 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:37 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2020-02-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Christian König, Nirmoy, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7567 bytes --]
Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>>> system domain here.
>>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>>
>>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>>
>>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>>> system domain.
>>>>
>>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>>
>>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>>
>>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>>
>>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>>
>>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>> {
>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>>> return 0;
>>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>>
>> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
>> we work with page or byte offsets.
>>
>> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
>> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
> OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
> shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and
put it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon
and nouveau would still need a separate function.
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>>> }
>>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>> + else
>>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>>> } else {
>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 10009 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 182 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 19:06 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2020-02-18 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: christian.koenig
Cc: thellstrom, kraxel, airlied, kenny.ho, Nirmoy, dri-devel, bskeggs,
nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer, amd-gfx, Thomas Zimmermann,
nouveau, alexander.deucher, sean, Nirmoy Das
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
> > > Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
> > > > > On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > > Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> > > > > > > > GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
> > > > > > > > device
> > > > > > > > driver.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
> > > > > > > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
> > > > > > > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
> > > > > > > > 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
> > > > > > > > ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
> > > > > > > > - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
> > > > > > > > man->available_caching);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
> > > > > > > > man->default_caching);
> > > > > > > > @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
> > > > > > > > ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > > > > > > moved:
> > > > > > > > bo->evicted = false;
> > > > > > > > - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> > > > > > > > - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> > > > > > > > - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
> > > > > > > > - else
> > > > > > > > - bo->offset = 0;
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
> > > > > > > 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
> > > > > > At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
> > > > > > GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
> > > > > > system domain here.
> > > > > I wonder how to verify that ?
> > > > >
> > > > > If I understand correctly:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
> > > > > system domain.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> > > > > patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> > > > > vmwgfx should be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> > > > I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> > > > and use it everywhere. Something like
> > > >
> > > > s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> > > > {
> > > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> > > > return 0;
> > > > return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> > > > also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
> > > Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
> > >
> > > See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
> > > we work with page or byte offsets.
> > >
> > > For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
> > > not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
> > OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
> > shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
>
> That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and put
> it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
>
> It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon and
> nouveau would still need a separate function.
Let me pile on with my bikeshed color choice :-)
I'd do this a wrapper, but for drivers individually. And only for those we
haven't audited yet, or where we think the WARN_ON actually provides
value. So maybe in vram helpers, since that might be used by some drivers
that get stuff wrong. Or maybe noveau isn't audited yet.
That also sidesteps the "what should we call this, drivers are different?"
problem.
Anyway feel free to ignore me, really just a bikeshed at this point.
Cheers, Daniel
>
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Best regards
> > Thomas
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Christian.
> > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> > > > > *bo, bool evict,
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> > > > > nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> > > > > }
> > > > > + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> > > > > + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + nvbo->offset = 0;
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> > > > > WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nirmoy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Christian.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
> > > > > > > > * either of these locks held.
> > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
> > > > > > > > word size */
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > struct sg_table *sg;
> > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
> > > > > > > > bool has_type;
> > > > > > > > bool use_type;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t flags;
> > > > > > > > - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
> > > > > > > > word size */
> > > > > > > > uint64_t size;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t available_caching;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t default_caching;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > amd-gfx mailing list
> > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 19:06 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2020-02-18 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: christian.koenig
Cc: thellstrom, kraxel, airlied, kenny.ho, Nirmoy, dri-devel, bskeggs,
nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer, amd-gfx, Thomas Zimmermann,
nouveau, alexander.deucher, sean, Nirmoy Das
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
> > > Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
> > > > > On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > > Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> > > > > > > > GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
> > > > > > > > device
> > > > > > > > driver.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
> > > > > > > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
> > > > > > > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
> > > > > > > > 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
> > > > > > > > ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
> > > > > > > > - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
> > > > > > > > man->available_caching);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
> > > > > > > > man->default_caching);
> > > > > > > > @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
> > > > > > > > ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > > > > > > moved:
> > > > > > > > bo->evicted = false;
> > > > > > > > - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> > > > > > > > - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> > > > > > > > - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
> > > > > > > > - else
> > > > > > > > - bo->offset = 0;
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
> > > > > > > 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
> > > > > > At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
> > > > > > GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
> > > > > > system domain here.
> > > > > I wonder how to verify that ?
> > > > >
> > > > > If I understand correctly:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
> > > > > system domain.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> > > > > patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> > > > > vmwgfx should be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> > > > I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> > > > and use it everywhere. Something like
> > > >
> > > > s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> > > > {
> > > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> > > > return 0;
> > > > return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> > > > also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
> > > Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
> > >
> > > See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
> > > we work with page or byte offsets.
> > >
> > > For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
> > > not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
> > OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
> > shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
>
> That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and put
> it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
>
> It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon and
> nouveau would still need a separate function.
Let me pile on with my bikeshed color choice :-)
I'd do this a wrapper, but for drivers individually. And only for those we
haven't audited yet, or where we think the WARN_ON actually provides
value. So maybe in vram helpers, since that might be used by some drivers
that get stuff wrong. Or maybe noveau isn't audited yet.
That also sidesteps the "what should we call this, drivers are different?"
problem.
Anyway feel free to ignore me, really just a bikeshed at this point.
Cheers, Daniel
>
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Best regards
> > Thomas
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Christian.
> > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> > > > > *bo, bool evict,
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> > > > > nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> > > > > }
> > > > > + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> > > > > + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + nvbo->offset = 0;
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> > > > > WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nirmoy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Christian.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
> > > > > > > > * either of these locks held.
> > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
> > > > > > > > word size */
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > struct sg_table *sg;
> > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
> > > > > > > > bool has_type;
> > > > > > > > bool use_type;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t flags;
> > > > > > > > - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
> > > > > > > > word size */
> > > > > > > > uint64_t size;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t available_caching;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t default_caching;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > amd-gfx mailing list
> > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 19:06 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2020-02-18 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
airlied-cv59FeDIM0c, kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, Nirmoy,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA, nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
Nirmoy Das
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > Hi
> >
> > Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
> > > Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
> > > > > On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > > Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> > > > > > > > GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
> > > > > > > > device
> > > > > > > > driver.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
> > > > > > > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
> > > > > > > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
> > > > > > > > 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
> > > > > > > > ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
> > > > > > > > - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
> > > > > > > > man->available_caching);
> > > > > > > > drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
> > > > > > > > man->default_caching);
> > > > > > > > @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
> > > > > > > > ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > > > > > > moved:
> > > > > > > > bo->evicted = false;
> > > > > > > > - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> > > > > > > > - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> > > > > > > > - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
> > > > > > > > - else
> > > > > > > > - bo->offset = 0;
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
> > > > > > > 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
> > > > > > At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
> > > > > > GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
> > > > > > system domain here.
> > > > > I wonder how to verify that ?
> > > > >
> > > > > If I understand correctly:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
> > > > > system domain.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
> > > > > patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
> > > > > vmwgfx should be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> > > > I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> > > > and use it everywhere. Something like
> > > >
> > > > s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> > > > {
> > > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> > > > return 0;
> > > > return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> > > > also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
> > > Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
> > >
> > > See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
> > > we work with page or byte offsets.
> > >
> > > For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
> > > not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
> > OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
> > shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
>
> That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and put
> it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
>
> It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon and
> nouveau would still need a separate function.
Let me pile on with my bikeshed color choice :-)
I'd do this a wrapper, but for drivers individually. And only for those we
haven't audited yet, or where we think the WARN_ON actually provides
value. So maybe in vram helpers, since that might be used by some drivers
that get stuff wrong. Or maybe noveau isn't audited yet.
That also sidesteps the "what should we call this, drivers are different?"
problem.
Anyway feel free to ignore me, really just a bikeshed at this point.
Cheers, Daniel
>
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Best regards
> > Thomas
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Christian.
> > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > > > @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
> > > > > *bo, bool evict,
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> > > > > nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
> > > > > }
> > > > > + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
> > > > > + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + nvbo->offset = 0;
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> > > > > WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nirmoy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Christian.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
> > > > > > > > * either of these locks held.
> > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
> > > > > > > > word size */
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > struct sg_table *sg;
> > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > > > > > > @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
> > > > > > > > bool has_type;
> > > > > > > > bool use_type;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t flags;
> > > > > > > > - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
> > > > > > > > word size */
> > > > > > > > uint64_t size;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t available_caching;
> > > > > > > > uint32_t default_caching;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > > dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > amd-gfx mailing list
> > amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-19 12:47 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-19 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, christian.koenig
Cc: thellstrom, kraxel, airlied, kenny.ho, dri-devel, bskeggs,
nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer, amd-gfx, Thomas Zimmermann,
nouveau, alexander.deucher, sean, Nirmoy Das
On 2/18/20 8:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>>>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>>>>> system domain here.
>>>>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>>>>> system domain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>>>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>>>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>>>>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>>>>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>>>>
>>>>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>>>>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>>>> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>>>>
>>>> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
>>>> we work with page or byte offsets.
>>>>
>>>> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
>>>> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
>>> OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
>>> shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
>> That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and put
>> it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
>>
>> It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon and
>> nouveau would still need a separate function.
> Let me pile on with my bikeshed color choice :-)
>
> I'd do this a wrapper, but for drivers individually. And only for those we
> haven't audited yet, or where we think the WARN_ON actually provides
> value. So maybe in vram helpers, since that might be used by some drivers
> that get stuff wrong. Or maybe noveau isn't audited yet.
I like this idea more. I will modify and resend patches with above
suggestions.
> That also sidesteps the "what should we call this, drivers are different?"
> problem.
>
> Anyway feel free to ignore me, really just a bikeshed at this point.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=oDEilLoCymlcMxXJ2mnVWwTxqloQlW0SP3HDPmQRSVc%3D&reserved=0
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=oDEilLoCymlcMxXJ2mnVWwTxqloQlW0SP3HDPmQRSVc%3D&reserved=0
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=XNDpZIj%2FwDbHOHBL25G%2FHpS9JETN%2F37H35E6t4q4joU%3D&reserved=0
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nouveau mailing list
>> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnouveau&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=6ln5B81rbRdVEN6tRk8KMmIx04VPJw10dwZdqIYMkSo%3D&reserved=0
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-19 12:47 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-19 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, christian.koenig
Cc: thellstrom, kraxel, airlied, kenny.ho, dri-devel, bskeggs,
nirmoy.das, linux-graphics-maintainer, amd-gfx, Thomas Zimmermann,
nouveau, alexander.deucher, sean, Nirmoy Das
On 2/18/20 8:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>>>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>>>>> system domain here.
>>>>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>>>>> system domain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>>>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>>>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>>>>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>>>>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>>>>
>>>>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>>>>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>>>> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>>>>
>>>> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
>>>> we work with page or byte offsets.
>>>>
>>>> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
>>>> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
>>> OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
>>> shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
>> That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and put
>> it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
>>
>> It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon and
>> nouveau would still need a separate function.
> Let me pile on with my bikeshed color choice :-)
>
> I'd do this a wrapper, but for drivers individually. And only for those we
> haven't audited yet, or where we think the WARN_ON actually provides
> value. So maybe in vram helpers, since that might be used by some drivers
> that get stuff wrong. Or maybe noveau isn't audited yet.
I like this idea more. I will modify and resend patches with above
suggestions.
> That also sidesteps the "what should we call this, drivers are different?"
> problem.
>
> Anyway feel free to ignore me, really just a bikeshed at this point.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=oDEilLoCymlcMxXJ2mnVWwTxqloQlW0SP3HDPmQRSVc%3D&reserved=0
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=oDEilLoCymlcMxXJ2mnVWwTxqloQlW0SP3HDPmQRSVc%3D&reserved=0
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=XNDpZIj%2FwDbHOHBL25G%2FHpS9JETN%2F37H35E6t4q4joU%3D&reserved=0
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nouveau mailing list
>> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnouveau&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=6ln5B81rbRdVEN6tRk8KMmIx04VPJw10dwZdqIYMkSo%3D&reserved=0
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-19 12:47 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-19 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
airlied-cv59FeDIM0c, kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA, nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW, Thomas Zimmermann,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
Nirmoy Das
On 2/18/20 8:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>>>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>>>> moved:
>>>>>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>>>>> system domain here.
>>>>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>>>>> system domain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>>>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>>>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>>>>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>>>>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>>>>
>>>>> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>>>>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>>>> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>>>>
>>>> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
>>>> we work with page or byte offsets.
>>>>
>>>> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
>>>> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
>>> OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
>>> shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.
>> That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and put
>> it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.
>>
>> It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon and
>> nouveau would still need a separate function.
> Let me pile on with my bikeshed color choice :-)
>
> I'd do this a wrapper, but for drivers individually. And only for those we
> haven't audited yet, or where we think the WARN_ON actually provides
> value. So maybe in vram helpers, since that might be used by some drivers
> that get stuff wrong. Or maybe noveau isn't audited yet.
I like this idea more. I will modify and resend patches with above
suggestions.
> That also sidesteps the "what should we call this, drivers are different?"
> problem.
>
> Anyway feel free to ignore me, really just a bikeshed at this point.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=oDEilLoCymlcMxXJ2mnVWwTxqloQlW0SP3HDPmQRSVc%3D&reserved=0
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=oDEilLoCymlcMxXJ2mnVWwTxqloQlW0SP3HDPmQRSVc%3D&reserved=0
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=XNDpZIj%2FwDbHOHBL25G%2FHpS9JETN%2F37H35E6t4q4joU%3D&reserved=0
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nouveau mailing list
>> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnouveau&data=02%7C01%7CNirmoy.Das%40amd.com%7Cb0279de1528f44e16aa508d7b4a5b192%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637176496067660861&sdata=6ln5B81rbRdVEN6tRk8KMmIx04VPJw10dwZdqIYMkSo%3D&reserved=0
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:30 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Christian König, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
On 2/18/20 7:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>> device
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>> moved:
>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>
>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>
>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>> system domain here.
>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>
>> If I understand correctly:
>>
>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>> system domain.
>>
>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>
>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>
>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>
>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>
>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> and use it everywhere. Something like
>
> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> return 0;
> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
The idea here is to remove this GPU memory offset calculation and
reference completely
from ttm and let drivers decide how to handle that. Drivers are full of
ugly shift anyway imho :)
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + else
>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> -
>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:30 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Christian König, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, nouveau, alexander.deucher,
sean, kraxel
On 2/18/20 7:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>> device
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>> moved:
>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>
>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>
>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>> system domain here.
>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>
>> If I understand correctly:
>>
>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>> system domain.
>>
>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>
>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>
>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>
>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>
>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> and use it everywhere. Something like
>
> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> return 0;
> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
The idea here is to remove this GPU memory offset calculation and
reference completely
from ttm and let drivers decide how to handle that. Drivers are full of
ugly shift anyway imho :)
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + else
>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> -
>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-18 18:30 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Christian König, Nirmoy Das,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
kraxel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
On 2/18/20 7:16 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>> device
>>>>> driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -------
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>> - drm_printf(p, " gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>> drm_printf(p, " default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>> moved:
>>>>> bo->evicted = false;
>>>>> - if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>> - bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>> - bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - bo->offset = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>
>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>
>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>> system domain here.
>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>
>> If I understand correctly:
>>
>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>> system domain.
>>
>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>
>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>
>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>
>> I am not sure about nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>
>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
> and use it everywhere. Something like
>
> s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
> return 0;
> return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
The idea here is to remove this GPU memory offset calculation and
reference completely
from ttm and let drivers decide how to handle that. Drivers are full of
ugly shift anyway imho :)
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo, bool evict,
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>> }
>> + if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>> + nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + else
>> + nvbo->offset = 0;
>> } else {
>> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>> WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>> ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>> * either of these locks held.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> -
>>>>> struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>> bool has_type;
>>>>> bool use_type;
>>>>> uint32_t flags;
>>>>> - uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>> word size */
>>>>> uint64_t size;
>>>>> uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>> uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-24 8:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2020-02-24 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, dri-devel, bskeggs, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, amd-gfx, Thomas Zimmermann, nouveau,
alexander.deucher, sean, Christian König, Nirmoy Das
Hi,
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this patch
> series so I think bochs is fine as well.
bochs needs the offset only to scanout framebuffers, which in turn
requires framebuffers being pinned to vram. So all green here.
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-24 8:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2020-02-24 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, dri-devel, bskeggs, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, amd-gfx, Thomas Zimmermann, nouveau,
alexander.deucher, sean, Christian König, Nirmoy Das
Hi,
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this patch
> series so I think bochs is fine as well.
bochs needs the offset only to scanout framebuffers, which in turn
requires framebuffers being pinned to vram. So all green here.
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
@ 2020-02-24 8:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2020-02-24 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy
Cc: thellstrom-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, airlied-cv59FeDIM0c,
kenny.ho-5C7GfCeVMHo, dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA, nirmoy.das-5C7GfCeVMHo,
linux-graphics-maintainer-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW, Thomas Zimmermann,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
alexander.deucher-5C7GfCeVMHo, sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ,
Christian König, Nirmoy Das
Hi,
> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this patch
> series so I think bochs is fine as well.
bochs needs the offset only to scanout framebuffers, which in turn
requires framebuffers being pinned to vram. So all green here.
cheers,
Gerd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
2020-02-24 8:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-02-24 9:59 ` Nirmoy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-24 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerd Hoffmann; +Cc: dri-devel
On 2/24/20 9:04 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this patch
>> series so I think bochs is fine as well.
> bochs needs the offset only to scanout framebuffers, which in turn
> requires framebuffers being pinned to vram. So all green here.
Thanks for confirming!
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM
2020-02-17 15:04 ` Nirmoy Das
@ 2020-02-18 12:42 ` Thomas Zimmermann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3393 bytes --]
Hi,
the email's subject line should contain the version of the patchset
(e.g, v2, v3, etc). git send-mail adds this with the -v switch
Best regards
Thomas
Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> With this patch series I am trying to remove GPU address dependency in
> TTM and moving GPU address calculation to individual drm drivers.
>
> I tested this patch series on qxl, bochs and amdgpu. Christian tested it on radeon HW.
> It would be nice if someone test this for nouveau and vmgfx.
>
> Nirmoy Das (8):
> drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo
> drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/vmwgfx: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/qxl: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
> drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 5 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 5 ----
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 9 -------
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -----
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 --
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
> 35 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM
@ 2020-02-18 12:42 ` Thomas Zimmermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmermann @ 2020-02-18 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3393 bytes --]
Hi,
the email's subject line should contain the version of the patchset
(e.g, v2, v3, etc). git send-mail adds this with the -v switch
Best regards
Thomas
Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
> With this patch series I am trying to remove GPU address dependency in
> TTM and moving GPU address calculation to individual drm drivers.
>
> I tested this patch series on qxl, bochs and amdgpu. Christian tested it on radeon HW.
> It would be nice if someone test this for nouveau and vmgfx.
>
> Nirmoy Das (8):
> drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo
> drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/vmwgfx: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/qxl: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
> drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
> drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 5 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 5 ----
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 9 -------
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -----
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 --
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
> 35 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM
2020-02-18 12:42 ` Thomas Zimmermann
@ 2020-02-18 15:57 ` Nirmoy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
On 2/18/20 1:42 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the email's subject line should contain the version of the patchset
> (e.g, v2, v3, etc). git send-mail adds this with the -v switch
Thanks Thomas. I over looked that, will add version tag from my next
emails.
Nirmoy
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>> With this patch series I am trying to remove GPU address dependency in
>> TTM and moving GPU address calculation to individual drm drivers.
>>
>> I tested this patch series on qxl, bochs and amdgpu. Christian tested it on radeon HW.
>> It would be nice if someone test this for nouveau and vmgfx.
>>
>> Nirmoy Das (8):
>> drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo
>> drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/vmwgfx: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/qxl: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
>> drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 5 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 5 ----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 9 -------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 --
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>> 35 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM
@ 2020-02-18 15:57 ` Nirmoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Nirmoy @ 2020-02-18 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmermann, Nirmoy Das, dri-devel
Cc: thellstrom, airlied, kenny.ho, brian.welty, amd-gfx, nirmoy.das,
linux-graphics-maintainer, bskeggs, alexander.deucher, sean,
christian.koenig, kraxel
On 2/18/20 1:42 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the email's subject line should contain the version of the patchset
> (e.g, v2, v3, etc). git send-mail adds this with the -v switch
Thanks Thomas. I over looked that, will add version tag from my next
emails.
Nirmoy
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>> With this patch series I am trying to remove GPU address dependency in
>> TTM and moving GPU address calculation to individual drm drivers.
>>
>> I tested this patch series on qxl, bochs and amdgpu. Christian tested it on radeon HW.
>> It would be nice if someone test this for nouveau and vmgfx.
>>
>> Nirmoy Das (8):
>> drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo
>> drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/vmwgfx: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/nouveau: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/qxl: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/vram-helper: don't use ttm bo->offset
>> drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset
>> drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/overlay.c | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base507c.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/ovly507e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndwc37e.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 8 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 10 +++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.h | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 5 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.h | 5 ----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 9 -------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 7 -----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 --
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 --
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>> 35 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread