[PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Roman I Khimov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]

Hello all.

Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is the fix:

--- a/conf/checksums.ini     2009-02-12 14:23:11.655542059 +0300
+++ b/conf/checksums.ini      2009-02-12 14:23:50.520780173 +0300
@@ -18931,8 +18931,8 @@ md5=b8f0661ac765ce1a2de66ca53e37af83
 sha256=a8168b8884ab40aadebba0ba696b889e25020d32a88e646d4f4bc56f2236b184

 [ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz]
-md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
-sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccdaebcebd72afc842c528bb6d3
+md5=cb0cabdac81b7171843427f32427ca84
+sha256=20f48aa3c1f950c224e844d3a7d28a679f41173a26a2d7095ef1da27bda42c2f

 [http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rpyc/rpyc-3.02.tar.gz]
 md5=4e855372c4a533b9ed605503156e6e04

-- 
                            Roman
 http://roman.khimov.ru
mailto: roman@khimov.ru
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 204 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Koen Kooi]

On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is the fix:

If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new 
tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats the 
purpose of us adding them.

regards,

Koen

>
> --- a/conf/checksums.ini     2009-02-12 14:23:11.655542059 +0300
> +++ b/conf/checksums.ini      2009-02-12 14:23:50.520780173 +0300
> @@ -18931,8 +18931,8 @@ md5=b8f0661ac765ce1a2de66ca53e37af83
>   sha256=a8168b8884ab40aadebba0ba696b889e25020d32a88e646d4f4bc56f2236b184
>
>   [ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz]
> -md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
> -sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccdaebcebd72afc842c528bb6d3
> +md5=cb0cabdac81b7171843427f32427ca84
> +sha256=20f48aa3c1f950c224e844d3a7d28a679f41173a26a2d7095ef1da27bda42c2f
>
>   [http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rpyc/rpyc-3.02.tar.gz]
>   md5=4e855372c4a533b9ed605503156e6e04
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1903 bytes --]

Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote:
>> Hello all.
>>
>> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is 
>> the fix:
> 
> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new 
> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats the 
> purpose of us adding them.

How can we find a copy of the tarball with the original checksum? I do 
not have it in my local source cache. The file date on the ftp server is 
March 1 2008. I'm surprised the FreeBSD crowd would change a tarball, 
without changing the version.

Philip


> 
> regards,
> 
> Koen
> 
>>
>> --- a/conf/checksums.ini     2009-02-12 14:23:11.655542059 +0300
>> +++ b/conf/checksums.ini      2009-02-12 14:23:50.520780173 +0300
>> @@ -18931,8 +18931,8 @@ md5=b8f0661ac765ce1a2de66ca53e37af83
>>   sha256=a8168b8884ab40aadebba0ba696b889e25020d32a88e646d4f4bc56f2236b184
>>
>>   
>> [ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz] 
>>
>> -md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
>> -sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccdaebcebd72afc842c528bb6d3
>> +md5=cb0cabdac81b7171843427f32427ca84
>> +sha256=20f48aa3c1f950c224e844d3a7d28a679f41173a26a2d7095ef1da27bda42c2f
>>
>>   [http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rpyc/rpyc-3.02.tar.gz]
>>   md5=4e855372c4a533b9ed605503156e6e04
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2589 bytes --]

Philip Balister wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote:
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is 
>>> the fix:
>>
>> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new 
>> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats the 
>> purpose of us adding them.
> 
> How can we find a copy of the tarball with the original checksum? I do 
> not have it in my local source cache. The file date on the ftp server is 
> March 1 2008. I'm surprised the FreeBSD crowd would change a tarball, 
> without changing the version.

I checked a couple of the files from this list:

http://dir.filewatcher.com/d/FreeBSD/5.4-release/alpha/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz.3919.html

and the md5sum is 6759b9c029d0c20c657b88d60bc2e277

And yes, I am sort of testing patchwork :) [1]

Philip

[1] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/6/



> 
> Philip
> 
> 
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Koen
>>
>>>
>>> --- a/conf/checksums.ini     2009-02-12 14:23:11.655542059 +0300
>>> +++ b/conf/checksums.ini      2009-02-12 14:23:50.520780173 +0300
>>> @@ -18931,8 +18931,8 @@ md5=b8f0661ac765ce1a2de66ca53e37af83
>>>   
>>> sha256=a8168b8884ab40aadebba0ba696b889e25020d32a88e646d4f4bc56f2236b184
>>>
>>>   
>>> [ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz] 
>>>
>>> -md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
>>> -sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccdaebcebd72afc842c528bb6d3
>>> +md5=cb0cabdac81b7171843427f32427ca84
>>> +sha256=20f48aa3c1f950c224e844d3a7d28a679f41173a26a2d7095ef1da27bda42c2f
>>>
>>>   [http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rpyc/rpyc-3.02.tar.gz]
>>>   md5=4e855372c4a533b9ed605503156e6e04
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Otavio Salvador]

Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> writes:

> Philip Balister wrote:
>> Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote:
>>>> Hello all.
>>>>
>>>> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here
>>>> is the fix:
>>>
>>> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new
>>> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats
>>> the purpose of us adding them.
>>
>> How can we find a copy of the tarball with the original checksum? I
>> do not have it in my local source cache. The file date on the ftp
>> server is March 1 2008. I'm surprised the FreeBSD crowd would change
>> a tarball, without changing the version.
>
> I checked a couple of the files from this list:
>
> http://dir.filewatcher.com/d/FreeBSD/5.4-release/alpha/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz.3919.html
>
> and the md5sum is 6759b9c029d0c20c657b88d60bc2e277
>
> And yes, I am sort of testing patchwork :) [1]
>
> Philip
>
> [1] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/6/

I'm also using this rpm2cpio since previous one couldn't be located by
me and this works quite fine. I personally support this patch.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Koen Kooi]

On 12-02-09 13:16, Philip Balister wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote:
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is
>>> the fix:
>>
>> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new
>> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats the
>> purpose of us adding them.
>
> How can we find a copy of the tarball with the original checksum? I do
> not have it in my local source cache. The file date on the ftp server is
> March 1 2008. I'm surprised the FreeBSD crowd would change a tarball,
> without changing the version.

It gets worse:

koen@dominion:/OE/build$ md5sum /OE/downloads/*rpm*tbz ; sha256sum 
/OE/downloads/*rpm*tbz
cb0cabdac81b7171843427f32427ca84  rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz
20f48aa3c1f950c224e844d3a7d28a679f41173a26a2d7095ef1da27bda42c2f 
rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz

angstrom@serenity:~/website/unstable/sources$ md5sum *rpm* ; sha256sum *rpm*
76f8b7060500191c7cde078f831c7f0c  rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz
aac7daba6d805d87e62636f0af53ce4b532cacf00a29485d94b3a605f2ffdf6c 
rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz


git annotate:

0da69511    (Marcin Juszkiewicz 2007-10-24 13:09:31 +0000 
18933)[ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz]
a7d0813d    (Otavio Salvador    2008-11-18 12:21:08 -0200 
18934)md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
a7d0813d    (Otavio Salvador    2008-11-18 12:21:08 -0200 
18935)sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccdaebcebd72afc842c528bb6d3

The first commit is:

commit 0da695117f8a142e6d15601d8d7064ed5c35074a
Author: Marcin Juszkiewicz <hrw@openembedded.org>
Date:   Wed Oct 24 13:09:31 2007 +0000

     checksums.ini: sync with Poky
     r2954 | hrw | 2007-10-24 14:29:57 +0200 (<C5><9A>r, 24 X 2007) | 1 line
     checksums.ini: added some new entries from OpenMoko build
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
     r2953 | hrw | 2007-10-24 14:28:03 +0200 (<C5><9A>r, 24 X 2007) | 1 line
     checksums.ini: sort by archive name (script for it will be pushed 
into OE later)
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
     r2952 | hrw | 2007-10-24 13:39:13 +0200 (<C5><9A>r, 24 X 2007) | 1 line
     checksums.ini: sort alphabetically to make updates easier

This is a red herring, see the diff:

-[ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz]
-md5=d4950dc6918ca79a4abab306b6188512
-sha256=5ec970d34b4e22feea0333dae3b5f5ee0e38295d89e306b4929b910f4a2aae25

+[ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz]
+md5=d4950dc6918ca79a4abab306b6188512
+sha256=5ec970d34b4e22feea0333dae3b5f5ee0e38295d89e306b4929b910f4a2aae25


The second one:

commit a7d0813dd5c391183b1356c49bf082a647123985
Author: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Date:   Tue Nov 18 12:21:08 2008 -0200

     checksums.ini: fix rpm2cpio checksums

-md5=d4950dc6918ca79a4abab306b6188512
-sha256=5ec970d34b4e22feea0333dae3b5f5ee0e38295d89e306b4929b910f4a2aae25
+md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
+sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccd

So it seems that freebsd people are replacing their files or that their 
server suffers massive disk corruption.

regards,

Koen

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Otavio Salvador]

Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> writes:

<...>
> commit a7d0813dd5c391183b1356c49bf082a647123985
> Author: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> Date:   Tue Nov 18 12:21:08 2008 -0200
>
>     checksums.ini: fix rpm2cpio checksums
>
> -md5=d4950dc6918ca79a4abab306b6188512
> -sha256=5ec970d34b4e22feea0333dae3b5f5ee0e38295d89e306b4929b910f4a2aae25
> +md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
> +sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccd
>
> So it seems that freebsd people are replacing their files or that
> their server suffers massive disk corruption.

Indeed :(

Do someone has contact with FreeBSD people to ask about it and get more
information?

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Yuri Bushmelev]

Hello!

> >> [ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-
> >>1.2_2.tbz]

This 
(ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz) 
is a freebsd precompiled package, not a source tarball. It can change 
checksum after rebuild. All files in 'packages' dir are precompiled 
packages.

Source tarballs are placed here (in 'distfiles' dir): 
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/distfiles/

-- 
Yuri Bushmelev

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Yuri Bushmelev]

Hello!

> > >> [ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpi
> > >>o- 1.2_2.tbz]
>
> This
> (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2
>_2.tbz) is a freebsd precompiled package, not a source tarball. It can
> change checksum after rebuild. All files in 'packages' dir are
> precompiled packages.
>
> Source tarballs are placed here (in 'distfiles' dir):
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/distfiles/

Ah, sorry, rpm2cpio have no source file. It is stored directly in ports:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/archivers/rpm2cpio/files/

We can grab it via cvs.

-- 
Yuri Bushmelev

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Roman I Khimov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1177 bytes --]

Koen Kooi:
> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote:
> > Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is
> > the fix:
>
> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new
> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats the
> purpose of us adding them.

If I've had old one anywhere around, I'd show the diff, but the problem is I 
don't have it.

From what I see most probably it's some meta-data changes as we have 
ready-to-install FreeBSD tarball there with all 
its "+COMMENT", "+CONTENTS", "+DESC", "+MTREE_DIRS" files. So 
the 'rpm2cpio.pl' itself should be the same.

Now another question is why OE package uses such tarball as source at all. 
So, probably we can change the source to something like

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RELEASE_7_1_0

which is the only file we need and it's rev'd tagged should-be-non-volatile.

-- 
                            Roman
 http://roman.khimov.ru
mailto: roman@khimov.ru
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 204 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Koen Kooi]

On 12-02-09 13:41, Roman I Khimov wrote:
> Koen Kooi:
>> On 12-02-09 12:26, Roman I Khimov wrote:
>>> Don't know why, but rpm2cpio tarball checksums are wrong, so here is
>>> the fix:
>> If they are wrong we want to see the diff between the old and new
>> tarballs, replacing checksums as soon as upstream changes defeats the
>> purpose of us adding them.
>
> If I've had old one anywhere around, I'd show the diff, but the problem is I
> don't have it.
>
>  From what I see most probably it's some meta-data changes as we have
> ready-to-install FreeBSD tarball there with all
> its "+COMMENT", "+CONTENTS", "+DESC", "+MTREE_DIRS" files. So
> the 'rpm2cpio.pl' itself should be the same.
>
> Now another question is why OE package uses such tarball as source at all.
> So, probably we can change the source to something like
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RELEASE_7_1_0
>
> which is the only file we need and it's rev'd tagged should-be-non-volatile.

Seeing the current sitation with the freebsd people this would get my vote.

regards,

Koen

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Otavio Salvador]

Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> writes:

<...>
>> Now another question is why OE package uses such tarball as source at all.
>> So, probably we can change the source to something like
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RELEASE_7_1_0
>>
>> which is the only file we need and it's rev'd tagged should-be-non-volatile.
>
> Seeing the current sitation with the freebsd people this would get my vote.
<...>

I support this one too :(

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Yuri Bushmelev]

Hello!

> > Now another question is why OE package uses such tarball as source at
> > all. So, probably we can change the source to something like
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/rp
> >m2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RE
> >LEASE_7_1_0
> >
> > which is the only file we need and it's rev'd tagged
> > should-be-non-volatile.
>
> Seeing the current sitation with the freebsd people this would get my
> vote.

You can grab it via cvs. E.g. (from taiwan mirror):
$ cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.tw.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs login
Logging in to :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.tw.freebsd.org:2401/home/ncvs
CVS password:
$ cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.tw.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs co rpm2cpio
cvs checkout: Updating rpm2cpio
cvs checkout: Updating rpm2cpio
U rpm2cpio/Makefile
U rpm2cpio/pkg-descr
cvs checkout: Updating rpm2cpio/files
U rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio

rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio is file you needed.

Or you can grab it from cvsweb as Roman says.

Or you cat grab precompiled package but from some release. It should not be 
changed anymore. E.g. from 7.1-RELEASE for i386 arch:
ftp://ftp6.ru.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7.1-release/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz

-- 
Yuri Bushmelev

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Roman I Khimov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2531 bytes --]

Yuri Bushmelev:
> Hello!
>
> > > Now another question is why OE package uses such tarball as source at
> > > all. So, probably we can change the source to something like
> > >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/
> > >rp
> > > m2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag
> > >=RE LEASE_7_1_0
> > >
> > > which is the only file we need and it's rev'd tagged
> > > should-be-non-volatile.
> >
> > Seeing the current sitation with the freebsd people this would get my
> > vote.
>
> You can grab it via cvs. E.g. (from taiwan mirror):
> ...
> Or you can grab it from cvsweb as Roman says.
>
> Or you cat grab precompiled package but from some release. 

Hmmm. So, what is the preferred color of bikeshed this season? ;)

I don't think we can trust precompiled packages with this situation. And cvs
checkout for one file... Well, maybe something like this:

--- a/conf/checksums.ini
+++ b/conf/checksums.ini
@@ -18682,9 +18682,9 @@ sha256=a515675401cc9aff33cf8fd48d23a177cb9385907758c0e29a1dab693f55efe2
 md5=b8f0661ac765ce1a2de66ca53e37af83
 sha256=a8168b8884ab40aadebba0ba696b889e25020d32a88e646d4f4bc56f2236b184
 
-[ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD//ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz]
-md5=63f39118ea5ef7cda84a0638002ed6d2
-sha256=27ffe0392ae193eb04786a2159c099a00fe38ccdaebcebd72afc842c528bb6d3
+[http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2]
+md5=07f64fa3dae6eb8b1b578d01473a5c07
+sha256=a98cb1d9903192c4fcf40d82c705e091a5c193f87327703217749a5f4cc6197d
 
 [http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rpyc/rpyc-3.02.tar.gz]
 md5=4e855372c4a533b9ed605503156e6e04
--- a/packages/rpm2cpio/rpm2cpio-native_1.2_2.bb
+++ b/packages/rpm2cpio/rpm2cpio-native_1.2_2.bb
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 DEPENDS="perl-native"
 LICENSE="BSD"
-SRC_URI="${FREEBSD_MIRROR}/ports/packages/archivers/rpm2cpio-1.2_2.tbz"
+SRC_URI="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/ports/archivers/rpm2cpio/files/rpm2cpio?rev=1.2"
 
 inherit native
 
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ do_compile() {
 
 do_stage() {
 	install -d ${STAGING_BINDIR}
-	sed -e '1,1s|${bindir}/|${bindir}/env |' bin/rpm2cpio.pl \
+	sed -e '1,1s|${bindir}/|${bindir}/env |' "rpm2cpio?rev=1.2" \
 		> ${STAGING_BINDIR}/rpm2cpio.pl
 
 	my_PERL="/usr/bin/env perl"

-- 
                            Roman
 http://roman.khimov.ru
mailto: roman@khimov.ru
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 204 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Otavio Salvador]

Roman I Khimov <roman@khimov.ru> writes:

> I don't think we can trust precompiled packages with this situation. And cvs
> checkout for one file... Well, maybe something like this:
<...>

I liked this solution since it is a simple http request, we track the
checksum and also avoid the freebsd packages.

+1

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: [PATCH] Fix rpm2cio sums

[Koen Kooi]

On 12-02-09 16:51, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Roman I Khimov<roman@khimov.ru>  writes:
>
>> I don't think we can trust precompiled packages with this situation. And cvs
>> checkout for one file... Well, maybe something like this:
> <...>
>
> I liked this solution since it is a simple http request, we track the
> checksum and also avoid the freebsd packages.
>
> +1

+1