service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

[Thomas Mueller]

hi wido

i see you replacing "/etc/init.d/ceph" with  "service ceph" .

The service thing does not exist on debian. IMHO /etc/init.d/ceph working 
for all - so may we have it called /etc/init.d/ceph instead of "service 
ceph"?

Or at least on debian specific pages please do not change it.

- Thomas

Re: service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

[Wido den Hollander]

Hi Thomas,

About Debian, your right, the service command is not installed by
default.

RHEL, CentOS and Ubuntu all support the "service" command, which makes
the Wiki usefull for those three distributions.

I'm not sure what Debian's plan is with the service command, they also
might install it.

As far as i know the service command is a part of the Linux Standard
Base (LSB), so using that would be a good idea.

I'll change back the Debian specific page.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Wido den Hollander
CTO
Contact: http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact


On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:57 +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> hi wido
> 
> i see you replacing "/etc/init.d/ceph" with  "service ceph" .
> 
> The service thing does not exist on debian. IMHO /etc/init.d/ceph working 
> for all - so may we have it called /etc/init.d/ceph instead of "service 
> ceph"?
> 
> Or at least on debian specific pages please do not change it.
> 
> - Thomas
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

[Thomas Mueller]

Am Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:13:58 +0200 schrieb Wido den Hollander:

> Hi Thomas,
> 
> About Debian, your right, the service command is not installed by
> default.
> 
> RHEL, CentOS and Ubuntu all support the "service" command, which makes
> the Wiki usefull for those three distributions.
> 
> I'm not sure what Debian's plan is with the service command, they also
> might install it.
> 
> As far as i know the service command is a part of the Linux Standard
> Base (LSB), so using that would be a good idea.
> 
> I'll change back the Debian specific page.
> 

hmm.. ok you're right. after lenny (5.0) it's in sysvinit-utils which is 
installed an every machine.


- Thomas

Re: service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

[Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe]

Regarding this, I had a problem with installing ceph from source on a
non-debian derived, nor redhat derived distro (it's mandriva derived).
make install doesn't seem to install any init/startup script.



On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch> wrote:
> Am Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:13:58 +0200 schrieb Wido den Hollander:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> About Debian, your right, the service command is not installed by
>> default.
>>
>> RHEL, CentOS and Ubuntu all support the "service" command, which makes
>> the Wiki usefull for those three distributions.
>>
>> I'm not sure what Debian's plan is with the service command, they also
>> might install it.
>>
>> As far as i know the service command is a part of the Linux Standard
>> Base (LSB), so using that would be a good idea.
>>
>> I'll change back the Debian specific page.
>>
>
> hmm.. ok you're right. after lenny (5.0) it's in sysvinit-utils which is
> installed an every machine.
>
>
> - Thomas
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Miguel Mascarenhas Filipe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

[Sage Weil]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1904 bytes --]

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe wrote:
> Regarding this, I had a problem with installing ceph from source on a
> non-debian derived, nor redhat derived distro (it's mandriva derived).
> make install doesn't seem to install any init/startup script.

The init.d script isn't installed by 'make install' for any distro.  Nor 
is the logrotate.d file, and probably some other stuff I'm forgetting.  
Startup/shutdown and log rotation vary between distributions and 'make 
install' doesn't bother to try to figure it out...

sage



> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch> wrote:
> > Am Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:13:58 +0200 schrieb Wido den Hollander:
> >
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >> About Debian, your right, the service command is not installed by
> >> default.
> >>
> >> RHEL, CentOS and Ubuntu all support the "service" command, which makes
> >> the Wiki usefull for those three distributions.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what Debian's plan is with the service command, they also
> >> might install it.
> >>
> >> As far as i know the service command is a part of the Linux Standard
> >> Base (LSB), so using that would be a good idea.
> >>
> >> I'll change back the Debian specific page.
> >>
> >
> > hmm.. ok you're right. after lenny (5.0) it's in sysvinit-utils which is
> > installed an every machine.
> >
> >
> > - Thomas
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Miguel Mascarenhas Filipe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 

Re: service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

[Thomas Mueller]

Am Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:42:30 +0100 schrieb Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa
Filipe:

> Regarding this, I had a problem with installing ceph from source on a
> non-debian derived, nor redhat derived distro (it's mandriva derived).
> make install doesn't seem to install any init/startup script.

what's your distro? did you try to build the rpm's with the ceph.spec 
file? 

Re: service ceph vs. /etc/init.d/ceph

[Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe]

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch> wrote:
> Am Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:42:30 +0100 schrieb Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa
> Filipe:
>
>> Regarding this, I had a problem with installing ceph from source on a
>> non-debian derived, nor redhat derived distro (it's mandriva derived).
>> make install doesn't seem to install any init/startup script.
>
> what's your distro? did you try to build the rpm's with the ceph.spec
> file?
>
>

I didn't, but will try in the weekend.
The distro is pretty unkown, its a  Portuguese derivation of Mandriva,
called Caixa Mágica.


> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Miguel Mascarenhas Filipe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html