meta-openembedded patch queue

meta-openembedded patch queue

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones I
didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and empty
now: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe

If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and is
lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)] (substitute
N please).

There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will have a
few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a week and the
patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a reminder. Replying to the
patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most people know where to find me on
IRC.

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFQIO7TMkyGM64RGpERAqLPAKCK1fvuntGQiTzIPl1f+gbk7cMAhACfe388
s978d0X19zmfwZ84oal2Ypg=
=Fdbg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[Andreas Müller]

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones I
> didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and empty
> now: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
>
> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and is
> lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)] (substitute
> N please).
>
> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will have a
> few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a week and the
> patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a reminder. Replying to the
> patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most people know where to find me on
> IRC.
>
> Koen
Two comments/questions:
1. Koen: what about the fuse 2.9.x patch [1]?
2. Martin: right now I am testing your latest systemctl mask patches.
After that I want to add a patch for systemctl-native to take care of
'Alias' tag and put [2] ontop. If you agree I will create a pull
request including your patches - so no need for you to resend. Agreed?

Andreas

[1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-July/040782.html
[2] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-August/040836.html

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1284 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:32:51PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones I
> didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and empty
> now: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
> 
> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and is
> lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)] (substitute
> N please).
> 
> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will have a
> few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a week and the
> patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a reminder. Replying to the
> patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most people know where to find me on
> IRC.

There are few pending patches IMHO worth including, I can resend them in
some consolidated pull request (all pushed to jansa/pull already), but 
listing pw ids is maybe easier for you to apply them:

systemctl mask (sorry I forgot to include meta-oe prefix):
33997 33999

patches from khem wit meta-systemd prefix:
33795 33793 33791 33789	33787

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[Andreas Müller]

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:32:51PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones I
>> didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and empty
>> now: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
>>
>> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and is
>> lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)] (substitute
>> N please).
>>
>> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will have a
>> few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a week and the
>> patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a reminder. Replying to the
>> patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most people know where to find me on
>> IRC.
>
> There are few pending patches IMHO worth including, I can resend them in
> some consolidated pull request (all pushed to jansa/pull already), but
> listing pw ids is maybe easier for you to apply them:
>
> systemctl mask (sorry I forgot to include meta-oe prefix):
> 33997 33999
>
> patches from khem wit meta-systemd prefix:
> 33795 33793 33791 33789 33787
>
OK I will base my two patches upon these and send them when tested.

Andreas

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[McClintock Matthew-B29882]

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones I
> didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and empty
> now: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
>
> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and is
> lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)] (substitute
> N please).
>
> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will have a
> few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a week and the
> patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a reminder. Replying to the
> patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most people know where to find me on
> IRC.

I have this:

http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/32957/

-M

>
> Koen
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iD8DBQFQIO7TMkyGM64RGpERAqLPAKCK1fvuntGQiTzIPl1f+gbk7cMAhACfe388
> s978d0X19zmfwZ84oal2Ypg=
> =Fdbg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 07-08-12 13:07, Martin Jansa schreef:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:32:51PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones
>> I didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and
>> empty now:
>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
>> 
>> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and
>> is lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)]
>> (substitute N please).
>> 
>> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will
>> have a few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a
>> week and the patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a
>> reminder. Replying to the patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most
>> people know where to find me on IRC.
> 
> There are few pending patches IMHO worth including, I can resend them in 
> some consolidated pull request (all pushed to jansa/pull already), but 
> listing pw ids is maybe easier for you to apply them:
> 
> systemctl mask (sorry I forgot to include meta-oe prefix): 33997 33999
> 
> patches from khem wit meta-systemd prefix: 33795 33793 33791 33789	33787

I didn't apply 33787, that needs coordination with other layers to prevent
breakage. I think doing a copy + delete a few days later is a better
migration path.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFQIg+RMkyGM64RGpERAtaoAKCor8oB+MKfZoTcBlRh4WRhxiWaYACdH7jq
MQKEHA00lFfiBeOSKT6p83c=
=ulLp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 07-08-12 19:53, McClintock Matthew-B29882 schreef:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> wrote: Hi,
> 
> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones
> I didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and
> empty now: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
> 
> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and
> is lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)]
> (substitute N please).
> 
> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will have
> a few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a week and
> the patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a reminder. Replying
> to the patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most people know where to
> find me on IRC.
> 
>> I have this:
> 
>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/32957/

Ah right, I did try that one, but forgot to actually send the feedback:

koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-openembedded$ sh contrib/pw-am.sh 32957
2012-08-08 09:04:45 URL:http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/32957/mbox/
[1299] -> "pw-am-32957.patch" [1]
Applying: cramfs_cvs.bb: fix compile step so it can be rerun without failing
error: patch failed: meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb:4
error: meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 cramfs_cvs.bb: fix compile step so it can be rerun
without failing
When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFQIg/dMkyGM64RGpERAjyFAJ0UfXrIdMAHVinfQZgXk+Y01rOqMgCgm3kP
6PKqyfo7oHk/kGZSMNnpK8k=
=Ccup
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2032 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Op 07-08-12 13:07, Martin Jansa schreef:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:32:51PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones
> >> I didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and
> >> empty now:
> >> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
> >> 
> >> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and
> >> is lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)]
> >> (substitute N please).
> >> 
> >> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will
> >> have a few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a
> >> week and the patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a
> >> reminder. Replying to the patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most
> >> people know where to find me on IRC.
> > 
> > There are few pending patches IMHO worth including, I can resend them in 
> > some consolidated pull request (all pushed to jansa/pull already), but 
> > listing pw ids is maybe easier for you to apply them:
> > 
> > systemctl mask (sorry I forgot to include meta-oe prefix): 33997 33999
> > 
> > patches from khem wit meta-systemd prefix: 33795 33793 33791 33789	33787

Thanks.

> I didn't apply 33787, that needs coordination with other layers to prevent

OK, for fwiw all BSPs in meta-smartphone layers are updated to use
machine_kernel_pr (in shr branch, master should probably still work with
current meta-oe/master).

> breakage. I think doing a copy + delete a few days later is a better
> migration path.

Yes, good idea, it doesn't have any bad side-effect if MACHINE_KERNEL_PR
logic is applied twice, so this should help other layers to update.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[McClintock Matthew-B29882]

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 07-08-12 19:53, McClintock Matthew-B29882 schreef:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
>> wrote: Hi,
>>
>> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the ones
>> I didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's nice and
>> empty now: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
>>
>> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master and
>> is lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH v(N+1)]
>> (substitute N please).
>>
>> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will have
>> a few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after a week and
>> the patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a reminder. Replying
>> to the patch with 'ping' is usually enough and most people know where to
>> find me on IRC.
>>
>>> I have this:
>>
>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/32957/
>
> Ah right, I did try that one, but forgot to actually send the feedback:
>
> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-openembedded$ sh contrib/pw-am.sh 32957
> 2012-08-08 09:04:45 URL:http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/32957/mbox/
> [1299] -> "pw-am-32957.patch" [1]
> Applying: cramfs_cvs.bb: fix compile step so it can be rerun without failing
> error: patch failed: meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb:4
> error: meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0001 cramfs_cvs.bb: fix compile step so it can be rerun
> without failing
> When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
> To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".

This is working fine for me, you are applying to denzil branch right?

[mattsm@right meta-oe ((568b986...))]$ wget -q -O-
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/32957/mbox/ | git am
Applying: cramfs_cvs.bb: fix compile step so it can be rerun without failing

-M

>
> regards,
>
> Koen
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iD8DBQFQIg/dMkyGM64RGpERAjyFAJ0UfXrIdMAHVinfQZgXk+Y01rOqMgCgm3kP
> 6PKqyfo7oHk/kGZSMNnpK8k=
> =Ccup
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 08-08-12 21:42, McClintock Matthew-B29882 schreef:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> wrote: Op 07-08-12 19:53, McClintock Matthew-B29882 schreef:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Koen Kooi
>>>> <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the
>>>> ones I didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's
>>>> nice and empty now:
>>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
>>>> 
>>>> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master
>>>> and is lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH
>>>> v(N+1)] (substitute N please).
>>>> 
>>>> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will
>>>> have a few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after
>>>> a week and the patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a
>>>> reminder. Replying to the patch with 'ping' is usually enough and
>>>> most people know where to find me on IRC.
>>>> 
>>>>> I have this:
>>>> 
>>>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/32957/
> 
> Ah right, I did try that one, but forgot to actually send the feedback:
> 
> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-openembedded$ sh contrib/pw-am.sh
> 32957 2012-08-08 09:04:45
> URL:http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/32957/mbox/ [1299] ->
> "pw-am-32957.patch" [1] Applying: cramfs_cvs.bb: fix compile step so it
> can be rerun without failing error: patch failed:
> meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb:4 error:
> meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb: patch does not apply Patch
> failed at 0001 cramfs_cvs.bb: fix compile step so it can be rerun without
> failing When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved". If
> you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip". To
> restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".
> 
>> This is working fine for me, you are applying to denzil branch right?

No master, Eric is in charge of denzil :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFQI1RQMkyGM64RGpERAnL+AKCCjeRxG4ji3G/POYT0s7uzgkVVFQCghawo
MIqlHeSHIh+jzf1m4fkYVYk=
=0ug3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: meta-openembedded patch queue

[McClintock Matthew-B29882]

On Aug 9, 2012 1:11 AM, "Koen Kooi" <koen@dominion.thruhere.net<mailto:koen@dominion.thruhere.net>> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 08-08-12 21:42, McClintock Matthew-B29882 schreef:
> > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net<mailto:koen@dominion.thruhere.net>>
> > wrote: Op 07-08-12 19:53, McClintock Matthew-B29882 schreef:
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Koen Kooi
> >>>> <koen@dominion.thruhere.net<mailto:koen@dominion.thruhere.net>> wrote: Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've applied a bunch of patches and hopefully commented on all the
> >>>> ones I didn't apply. I also cleared the meta-oe patchwork so it's
> >>>> nice and empty now:
> >>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe
> >>>>
> >>>> If your patch hasn't been applied yet into meta-openembedded master
> >>>> and is lacking comments, please resubmit it as [meta-oe][PATCH
> >>>> v(N+1)] (substitute N please).
> >>>>
> >>>> There are a few big deadlines coming up at work, so everything will
> >>>> have a few days of delay but if you haven't seen any feedback after
> >>>> a week and the patch is still sitting in patchwork, please send a
> >>>> reminder. Replying to the patch with 'ping' is usually enough and
> >>>> most people know where to find me on IRC.
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have this:
> >>>>
> >>>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/32957/
> >
> > Ah right, I did try that one, but forgot to actually send the feedback:
> >
> > koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-openembedded$ sh contrib/pw-am.sh
> > 32957 2012-08-08 09:04:45
> > URL:http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/32957/mbox/ [1299] ->
> > "pw-am-32957.patch" [1] Applying: cramfs_cvs.bb<http://cramfs_cvs.bb>: fix compile step so it
> > can be rerun without failing error: patch failed:
> > meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb:4<http://cramfs_cvs.bb:4> error:
> > meta-oe/recipes-support/cramfs/cramfs_cvs.bb<http://cramfs_cvs.bb>: patch does not apply Patch
> > failed at 0001 cramfs_cvs.bb<http://cramfs_cvs.bb>: fix compile step so it can be rerun without
> > failing When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved". If
> > you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip". To
> > restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".
> >
> >> This is working fine for me, you are applying to denzil branch right?
>
> No master, Eric is in charge of denzil :)

In that case its already applied to master. Sorry.

-M

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iD8DBQFQI1RQMkyGM64RGpERAnL+AKCCjeRxG4ji3G/POYT0s7uzgkVVFQCghawo
> MIqlHeSHIh+jzf1m4fkYVYk=
> =0ug3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org<mailto:Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel