From: Pavel <free.lan.c2.718r@gmail.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 Revised] NLM - lock failover
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:13:21 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20111130T104304-71@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 46156F3F.3070606@redhat.com
Wendy Cheng <wcheng <at> redhat.com> writes:
>
> Revised patches based on 2.6.21-rc4 kernel and nfs-utils-1.1.0-rc1 that
> address issues discussed in:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00034.html
>
> Quick How-to:
> 1) Failover server exports filesystem with "fsid" option as:
> /etc/exports entry> /mnt/shared/exports *(fsid=1234,sync,rw)
> 2) Failover server dispatch rpc.statd with "-H" option.
> 3) Failover server drops locks based on fsid by:
> shell> echo 1234 > /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_unlock
> 4) Takeover server enters per fsid grace period by:
> shell> echo 1234 > /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_set_igrace
> 5) Takeover server notifies clients for lock reclaim by:
> shell> /usr/sbin/sm-notify -f -v floating_ip_address -P an_sm_directory
>
> Patch Summary:
> 4-1: implement /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_unlock
> 4-2: implement /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_set_igrace
> 4-3: correctly record and pass incoming server ip interface into rpc.statd.
> 4-4: nfs-utils statd changes
> 4-1 includes an existing lockd bug fix as discussed in:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?
thread_name=4603506D.5040807%40redhat.com&forum_name=nfs
> (subject: [NFS] Question about f_count in struct nlm_file)
> 4-4 includes an existing nfs-utils statd bug fix as discussed in:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?
msg_name=46142B4F.1030507%40redhat.com
> (subject: Re: [NFS] lockd and statd)
>
> Misc:
> o No IPV6 support due to testing efforts
> o NFS V3 only - will compare notes with CITI folks (NFS V4 issues)
> o Still need some error-inject tests.
>
Hi everyone!
I'm building an A/A cluster using NFS v3 and local file systems, and looking for
efficient ways for failover (for now I have to restart nfs-kernel-server on
Takeover node to be able to initiate grace period), so the discussed solutions
are very interesting to me.
Now (4 years after) in current nfs-utils packages (v. 1.2.2-4 and later) I can
see that the ability to release locks was really implemented and is working well
(I mean interfaces /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_ip and /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem),
but how about reacquiring locks on the node, share migrates to? - I've been
going through various mailing lists and found a lot of discussions on the topic
(also dated mainly 2007), but don't seem to find any rpc-based mechanism or
interface like /proc/fs/nfsd/nlm_set_grace to do that, was it ever made?
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 21:50 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/4 Revised] NLM - lock failover Wendy Cheng
2007-04-05 21:50 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-11 17:01 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-11 17:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-17 19:30 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-17 19:30 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-18 18:56 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-18 18:56 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-18 19:46 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-18 19:46 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-19 14:41 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-19 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-19 15:08 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-19 15:08 ` Wendy Cheng
[not found] ` <message from Wendy Cheng on Tuesday April 17>
2007-04-19 7:04 ` [Cluster-devel] " Neil Brown
2007-04-19 7:04 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-19 14:53 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-19 14:53 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-24 3:30 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-24 3:30 ` Wendy Cheng
[not found] ` <message from Wendy Cheng on Monday April 23>
2007-04-24 5:52 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2007-04-24 5:52 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-26 4:35 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-26 4:35 ` Wendy Cheng
[not found] ` <message from Wendy Cheng on Thursday April 26>
2007-04-26 5:43 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2007-04-26 5:43 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-27 2:24 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 2:24 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 6:00 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2007-04-27 6:00 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-27 11:15 ` [NFS] " Jeff Layton
2007-04-27 11:15 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <message from Jeff Layton on Friday April 27>
2007-04-27 12:40 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2007-04-27 12:40 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-27 13:42 ` Jeff Layton
2007-04-27 18:57 ` [NFS] " Jeff Layton
2007-04-27 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-27 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-27 15:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-27 15:43 ` [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-27 15:36 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 15:36 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 16:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-27 16:31 ` [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <message from J. Bruce Fields on Friday April 27>
2007-04-27 22:22 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-27 22:22 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-29 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-29 20:14 ` [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <message from J. Bruce Fields on Sunday April 29>
2007-04-29 23:10 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-29 23:10 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-30 5:19 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-30 5:19 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-05-04 18:42 ` [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-04 18:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-04 21:35 ` [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-05-04 21:35 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-27 20:34 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-04-27 20:34 ` [NFS] " Frank van Maarseveen
2007-04-28 3:55 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-28 3:55 ` Wendy Cheng
[not found] ` <message from Wendy Cheng on Friday April 27>
2007-04-28 4:51 ` [NFS] " Neil Brown
2007-04-28 4:51 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-28 5:26 ` Marc Eshel
2007-04-28 5:27 ` [NFS] " Marc Eshel
2007-04-28 12:33 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-04-28 12:33 ` [NFS] " Frank van Maarseveen
2007-04-27 15:12 ` Jeff Layton
2007-04-27 15:12 ` [NFS] " Jeff Layton
2007-04-25 14:18 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-25 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-25 14:10 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 14:10 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:21 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Marc Eshel
2007-04-25 15:21 ` Marc Eshel
2007-04-25 15:19 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:19 ` Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:39 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:39 ` [Cluster-devel] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:59 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-25 15:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-25 15:52 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [NFS] " Wendy Cheng
2007-04-25 15:52 ` Wendy Cheng
2011-11-30 10:13 ` Pavel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20111130T104304-71@post.gmane.org \
--to=free.lan.c2.718r@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.