From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
Norman Diamond <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>,
Wes Janzen <superchkn@sbcglobal.net>,
Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nikita@namesys.com,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Justin Cormack <justin@street-vision.com>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Subject: Re: Blockbusting news, results are in
Date: 21 Oct 2003 04:31:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1he226fvm.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F924660.4040405@namesys.com>
Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> writes:
> Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >I've told you guys over and over that you need to CRC the data in user
> >space, we do that in our backup scripts and it tells us when the drives
> >are going bad. S
> >
> Why do the CRC in user space, that requires modifying every one of 7000+
> applications (if I understand you correctly, which is far from a sure thing;-)
> )?
End to end data integrity checking is a requirement. Otherwise errors
happen silently and you rarely if ever see them. And the error checking
must be end to end because you cannot trust the other layers to work
properly 100% of the time.
However to actually track down errors to root causes of errors, the closer
you can have your error checking to the hardware the better. So having
CRC data or similar in the filesystem for both the metadata and the
file information is a good thing.
> Write a reiser4 CRC file plugin. It would take a weekend, and most of the work
> would be cut and pasting from the default file plugin.. I understand why you do
> it in BK, but for user space as a whole user space is the wrong
> place.
Error checking should not be necessary for casual files that you don't
really care about but for times when you care about the integrity of
your data the application should be checking it.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-21 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-19 2:16 Blockbusting news, results are in Norman Diamond
2003-10-19 4:15 ` Larry McVoy
2003-10-19 5:00 ` Paul
2003-10-19 8:19 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-10-19 8:08 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-19 8:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-19 20:01 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-19 20:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-20 7:24 ` John Bradford
2003-10-19 22:49 ` jw schultz
2003-10-20 7:22 ` John Bradford
2003-10-20 8:22 ` jw schultz
2003-10-20 7:27 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-20 8:08 ` jw schultz
2003-10-19 19:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-20 7:22 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-21 10:31 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2003-10-21 8:43 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-19 7:37 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-19 8:09 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-19 8:24 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-19 11:43 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-10-19 15:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-10-19 8:13 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-19 8:17 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-19 8:41 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-20 15:56 ` Thayne Harbaugh
2003-10-19 8:21 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-10-19 8:27 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-19 9:01 ` Erik Andersen
2003-10-19 14:10 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-10-19 18:16 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-19 19:44 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-10-20 7:21 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-19 14:42 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-19 10:47 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-19 17:36 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-19 17:39 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-19 17:51 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-20 6:22 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-20 14:08 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-20 14:42 ` John Bradford
2003-10-20 15:55 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-20 17:32 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-21 15:18 Norman Diamond
2003-10-21 19:31 ` Chuck Campbell
2003-10-21 20:05 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-10-21 20:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-21 20:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-10-21 21:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-10-22 2:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-23 17:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1he226fvm.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=justin@street-vision.com \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
--cc=nikita@namesys.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=superchkn@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=vitaly@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.