From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] bitops: remove minix bitops from asm/bitops.h
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:50:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m262x24j2y.fsf@igel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cA=yf7NmPVKXaZdoTBYmwdmy_frk7b_feG-WG@mail.gmail.com> (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:59:24 +0200")
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Funny, m68k uses the little endian minix file system?
>
> Perhaps this was due to minix using the ext2 accessors? And ext2 being
> switched from big to little endian ext2 on m68k, without anyone
> noticing the impact
> on minix?
m68k has always used big-endian minixfs and the minix bitops were always
independent of the ext2 ones.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux\/m68k" <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] bitops: remove minix bitops from asm/bitops.h
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:50:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m262x24j2y.fsf@igel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cA=yf7NmPVKXaZdoTBYmwdmy_frk7b_feG-WG@mail.gmail.com> (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:59:24 +0200")
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Funny, m68k uses the little endian minix file system?
>
> Perhaps this was due to minix using the ext2 accessors? And ext2 being
> switched from big to little endian ext2 on m68k, without anyone
> noticing the impact
> on minix?
m68k has always used big-endian minixfs and the minix bitops were always
independent of the ext2 ones.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-16 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-15 9:45 [PATCH 00/22] Introduce little endian bitops Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:44 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 13/22] ocfs2: use " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 20:19 ` Joel Becker
2010-10-18 20:19 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2010-10-18 20:19 ` Joel Becker
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 01/22] bitops: merge little and big endian definisions in asm-generic/bitops/le.h Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 02/22] bitops: rename generic le bitops functions Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 03/22] s390: introduce little endian bitops Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 4:51 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 04/22] arm: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 9:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 9:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 13:22 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 13:22 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 13:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 13:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-18 15:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 15:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 13:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-18 13:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 05/22] m68k: introduce le bitops Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 06/22] m68knommu: introduce little endian bitops Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 07/22] bitops: introduce little endian bitops for most architectures Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 08/22] rds: stop including asm-generic/bitops/le.h Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 09/22] kvm: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 10/22] asm-generic: use little endian bitops Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 11:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 11/22] ext3: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 10:31 ` Jan Kara
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 12/22] ext4: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 14/22] nilfs2: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 15/22] reiserfs: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 16/22] udf: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 10:46 ` Jan Kara
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 17/22] ufs: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 18/22] md: use little endian bit operations Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 2:41 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 19/22] dm: " Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 20/22] bitops: remove ext2 non-atomic bitops from asm/bitops.h Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 21/22] m68k: convert minix bitops to use little endian bitops Akinobu Mita
2010-10-18 8:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-15 9:46 ` [PATCH 22/22] bitops: remove minix bitops from asm/bitops.h Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-15 18:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-15 20:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-16 7:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-10-16 8:50 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2010-10-16 8:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-16 11:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-10-16 12:40 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-16 12:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-16 12:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-16 13:47 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-16 15:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-16 15:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-19 15:05 ` Akinobu Mita
2010-10-15 11:14 ` [PATCH 00/22] Introduce little endian bitops Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m262x24j2y.fsf@igel.home \
--to=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.