From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: Qemu-KVM Livate Migration 0.12.2 -> 0.12.3/4 broken?
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 22:04:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3eihbbolj.fsf@trasno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF00592.5040403@redhat.com> (Avi Kivity's message of "Sun, 16 May 2010 17:47:46 +0300")
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/16/2010 05:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>>> Any idea why it fails? And how to fix it?
>>>
>> Lack of "proper" subsections. IDE is something like:
>>
>> const VMStateDescription vmstate_ide_drive = {
>> .version_id = 4,
>> ....
>> }
>>
>> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_bmdma = {
>> .name = "ide bmdma",
>> .version_id = 4,
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> const VMStateDescription vmstate_ide_pci = {
>> .name = "ide",
>> .version_id = 4,
>> ....
>> VMSTATE_STRUCT_ARRAY(bmdma, PCIIDEState, 2, 0,
>> vmstate_bmdma, BMDMAState),
>> VMSTATE_IDE_DRIVES(bus[0].ifs, PCIIDEState),
>> VMSTATE_IDE_DRIVES(bus[1].ifs, PCIIDEState),
>> ....
>> }
>>
>>
>> Notice that everything is at version 4. It used to be everything at
>> version 3. Now the problem is that when migrating from v3 -> v4. We
>> put in one place v3, But we only have a version number at the toplevel,
>> rest of "subsections" don't sent a version number. There is no way to
>> fix it in the general case. We can hack something around for ide, but
>> that will just be a hack, or we can backport marcelo change and port it
>> as a proper subsection (that is my plan). I expect to have time at the
>> end of next time to work on this.
>>
>
> end of next week?
Humm, for Spaniards weeks start on Monday :) (Monday is holiday here).
I mean here Friday 21.
>> So, to make the story short: I know what is happening, and I know how to
>> fix it, just that fix is not trivial. I just need time.
>>
>
> Meanwhile, we have a broken 0.12.4. Is there a quick'n'dirty
> workaround that will be forward compatible with the real fix that we
> can push out?
revert the patch. It almost never happen (being in the middle of one
IO) while migrating.
> We've regressed from failing some migrations to failing all migrations.
Humm, 0.12.4 -> 0.12.4 should work. My advise is just revert the patch
and live with it for another week, what do you think?
Later, Juan.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu-KVM Livate Migration 0.12.2 -> 0.12.3/4 broken?
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 22:04:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3eihbbolj.fsf@trasno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF00592.5040403@redhat.com> (Avi Kivity's message of "Sun, 16 May 2010 17:47:46 +0300")
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/16/2010 05:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>>> Any idea why it fails? And how to fix it?
>>>
>> Lack of "proper" subsections. IDE is something like:
>>
>> const VMStateDescription vmstate_ide_drive = {
>> .version_id = 4,
>> ....
>> }
>>
>> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_bmdma = {
>> .name = "ide bmdma",
>> .version_id = 4,
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> const VMStateDescription vmstate_ide_pci = {
>> .name = "ide",
>> .version_id = 4,
>> ....
>> VMSTATE_STRUCT_ARRAY(bmdma, PCIIDEState, 2, 0,
>> vmstate_bmdma, BMDMAState),
>> VMSTATE_IDE_DRIVES(bus[0].ifs, PCIIDEState),
>> VMSTATE_IDE_DRIVES(bus[1].ifs, PCIIDEState),
>> ....
>> }
>>
>>
>> Notice that everything is at version 4. It used to be everything at
>> version 3. Now the problem is that when migrating from v3 -> v4. We
>> put in one place v3, But we only have a version number at the toplevel,
>> rest of "subsections" don't sent a version number. There is no way to
>> fix it in the general case. We can hack something around for ide, but
>> that will just be a hack, or we can backport marcelo change and port it
>> as a proper subsection (that is my plan). I expect to have time at the
>> end of next time to work on this.
>>
>
> end of next week?
Humm, for Spaniards weeks start on Monday :) (Monday is holiday here).
I mean here Friday 21.
>> So, to make the story short: I know what is happening, and I know how to
>> fix it, just that fix is not trivial. I just need time.
>>
>
> Meanwhile, we have a broken 0.12.4. Is there a quick'n'dirty
> workaround that will be forward compatible with the real fix that we
> can push out?
revert the patch. It almost never happen (being in the middle of one
IO) while migrating.
> We've regressed from failing some migrations to failing all migrations.
Humm, 0.12.4 -> 0.12.4 should work. My advise is just revert the patch
and live with it for another week, what do you think?
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-16 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-11 10:59 Qemu-KVM Livate Migration 0.12.2 -> 0.12.3/4 broken? Peter Lieven
2010-05-11 10:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Lieven
2010-05-11 23:11 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-11 23:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2010-05-12 13:42 ` Peter Lieven
2010-05-16 12:02 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-16 12:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-05-16 14:42 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-16 14:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2010-05-16 14:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-16 14:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-05-16 20:04 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2010-05-16 20:04 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-17 7:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-17 7:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-05-17 8:23 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-17 8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Tokarev
2010-05-17 9:07 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-17 9:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2010-05-17 9:11 ` Michael Tokarev
2010-05-17 9:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Tokarev
2010-05-17 9:38 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-17 9:38 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-16 18:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-16 18:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-05-16 20:06 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-16 20:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2010-05-17 10:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-17 10:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-06-08 9:54 ` Peter Lieven
2010-06-08 9:54 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3eihbbolj.fsf@trasno.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pl@dlh.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.