All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Alexander Graf <agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: elide struct thread_struct instances from stack
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:36:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r5krrvy2.fsf@hase.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100531224040.GA22927-oklZEfemRj05kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> (Paul Mackerras's message of "Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:40:40 +1000")

Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> writes:

> I re-read the relevant part of the PowerPC architecture spec
> yesterday, and it seems pretty clear that the FPSCR doesn't affect the
> behaviour of lfs and stfs, and is not affected by them.  So in fact 4
> out of the 7 instructions in each of those procedures are unnecessary
> (and similarly for the cvt_fd/df used in the alignment fixup code).

I'd prefer to have this deferred to a separate patch.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: elide struct thread_struct instances from stack
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:36:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r5krrvy2.fsf@hase.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100531224040.GA22927@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> (Paul Mackerras's message of "Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:40:40 +1000")

Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> writes:

> I re-read the relevant part of the PowerPC architecture spec
> yesterday, and it seems pretty clear that the FPSCR doesn't affect the
> behaviour of lfs and stfs, and is not affected by them.  So in fact 4
> out of the 7 instructions in each of those procedures are unnecessary
> (and similarly for the cvt_fd/df used in the alignment fixup code).

I'd prefer to have this deferred to a separate patch.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Alexander Graf <agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: elide struct thread_struct instances from stack
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:36:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r5krrvy2.fsf@hase.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100531224040.GA22927-oklZEfemRj05kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> (Paul Mackerras's message of "Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:40:40 +1000")

Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> writes:

> I re-read the relevant part of the PowerPC architecture spec
> yesterday, and it seems pretty clear that the FPSCR doesn't affect the
> behaviour of lfs and stfs, and is not affected by them.  So in fact 4
> out of the 7 instructions in each of those procedures are unnecessary
> (and similarly for the cvt_fd/df used in the alignment fixup code).

I'd prefer to have this deferred to a separate patch.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-01  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-31 19:59 [PATCH] KVM: PPC: elide struct thread_struct instances from stack Andreas Schwab
2010-05-31 19:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-05-31 19:59 ` Andreas Schwab
     [not found] ` <m26323onam.fsf-hBGjKatGTSWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-31 20:00   ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-31 20:00     ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-31 20:00     ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-31 22:40   ` [PATCH] KVM: PPC: elide struct thread_struct instances from Paul Mackerras
2010-05-31 22:40     ` [PATCH] KVM: PPC: elide struct thread_struct instances from stack Paul Mackerras
2010-05-31 22:40     ` Paul Mackerras
2010-05-31 23:27     ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-31 23:27       ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-31 23:27       ` Alexander Graf
     [not found]     ` <20100531224040.GA22927-oklZEfemRj05kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-01  8:36       ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2010-06-01  8:36         ` Andreas Schwab
2010-06-01  8:36         ` Andreas Schwab
     [not found]         ` <m3r5krrvy2.fsf-YqIcNwjZo96zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-01  9:19           ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-01  9:19             ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-01  9:19             ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-02 16:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-02 16:00   ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3r5krrvy2.fsf@hase.home \
    --to=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.