[LARTC] Screwy network question

[LARTC] Screwy network question

[Gerry Creager N5JXS]

This doesn't come under the call of traffic control, but this group's
about the best place I can think of to ask the question.

Under IPRoute2, or Zebra, or GATED, or anything else that'll work, and
looking at the attached PNG, does anyone have some suggestions for
making this thing work?  R1 and R2 will have to use BGP4 to peer with
the Internet 2 router.  R1 can fully advertise routes.  R2 must get
updates but NOT advertise routes.  R2 or an additional box must NAT to a
real address anything going to Internet 2.  R1 has no NAT requirements.

The NAT/proxy boxes are not negotiable, as they are associated with
school districts, and thanks to Congress, we have requirements for
content filtering that are of questionable value, but are law.

Any thoughts or suggestions anyone might have would be appreciated!

TIA, gerry
--
Gerry Creager -- gerry@cs.tamu.edu
Network Engineering
Academy for Advanced Telecommunications and Learning Technologies		
Texas A&M University	979.458.4020  (Phone) -- 979.847.8578  (Fax)

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

Re: [LARTC] Screwy network question

[bert hubert]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:26:40PM -0500, Gerry Creager N5JXS wrote:
> This doesn't come under the call of traffic control, but this group's
> about the best place I can think of to ask the question.
> 
> Under IPRoute2, or Zebra, or GATED, or anything else that'll work, and
> looking at the attached PNG, does anyone have some suggestions for
> making this thing work?  R1 and R2 will have to use BGP4 to peer with
> the Internet 2 router.  R1 can fully advertise routes.  R2 must get
> updates but NOT advertise routes.  R2 or an additional box must NAT to a
> real address anything going to Internet 2.  R1 has no NAT requirements.

Your PNG is nearly unreadable, so if you can provide a better one, please
do. Also, do you have tangible problems already, or is this an openended
question?

I am very interested to help, but so far your question is pretty broad.

> The NAT/proxy boxes are not negotiable, as they are associated with
> school districts, and thanks to Congress, we have requirements for
> content filtering that are of questionable value, but are law.

'The land of the free'. 

> Any thoughts or suggestions anyone might have would be appreciated!

Well, gated is old, and I don't thinkt it does BGP4. Zebra is pretty cool
and there is also another project like it that you might want to look into.
If I remember the name, I'll post it. 

But please supply more information!

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab                                 The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl           - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/