* [LARTC] naming classes/qdiscs - answer
@ 2001-12-07 15:41 Don Cohen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Don Cohen @ 2001-12-07 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
> is the naming of classes essential for building them correctly? is
parent 1:1 classid 10:0 somehow different from parent 1:1 classid 1:2?
up to now i thought classid was only a name and the parent would be
enough to make the classes' positions in the tree unambiguously...
I think I mentioned this in my review of the recent howto updates.
Here's the explanation from
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
Note: In general (not just for HTB but for all qdiscs and classes in
tc), handles are written x:y where x is an integer identifying a
qdisc and y is an integer identifying a class belonging to that
qdisc. The handle for a qdisc must have zero for its y value and
the handle for a class must have a non-zero value for its y value. The
"1:" above is treated as "1:0".
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-12-07 15:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-07 15:41 [LARTC] naming classes/qdiscs - answer Don Cohen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.