* [LARTC] Questions about HTB classes with an SFQ
@ 2002-07-08 21:56 Joshua Snyder
2002-07-10 8:24 ` Martin Devera
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Snyder @ 2002-07-08 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
I have read most of the documents regarding both Htb and Sfq and I
still am not sure if it is best to put the Sfq on the leaf Htb or to put
it closer to the root class. All of the docs for Htb say to put it on the
leaf classes but the Sfq stuff says to put it closer to the root(but not
on the root). If my case every leaf class is only going to be one
machine/user. I want to have fairness between machines(I don't want one
person to get all of the bandwidth). I don't think putting Sfq on the
leaf classes will get me this, but I haven't been able to find a place
that says this for sure...
josh
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-10 8:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-08 21:56 [LARTC] Questions about HTB classes with an SFQ Joshua Snyder
2002-07-10 8:24 ` Martin Devera
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.