From: zarkdav@eddy.easynet.fr (Benjamin Ryzman)
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Multipath routing with different bandwidth and cost
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:04:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104383834415047@msgid-missing> (raw)
Hi,
My workstation is connected to a LAN with two different gateways. GW1 is
rate-limited to 2Mbps while GW2 is unlimited. Routing through GW1
is cheaper, thus I don't want to be using only GW2.
At any given time, I would like to be able to use GW1 while keeping it
uncongestioned and to use GW2 for the remaining traffic.
I know I can create a weighted multipath route but I believe the weight
doesn't allow me to specify the rate-limitation of GW1.
Do you think I can come to a solution using iproute2, netfilter and tc?
Regards,
Benjamin
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
reply other threads:[~2003-01-29 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104383834415047@msgid-missing \
--to=zarkdav@eddy.easynet.fr \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.