* [LARTC] Bridge+QOS
@ 2003-03-17 6:55 hare ram
2003-03-17 17:19 ` Stef Coene
2003-03-18 1:52 ` S Mohan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hare ram @ 2003-03-17 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi all
iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services
i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works
i ahve setup like this
LAN--eth1(Bridge)eth0--router--Internet
in LAN i have users 10 people
i would like to have QOS Services for 5 people burstable
5 People commited ( bounded b/w what i have)
Can i use TC+htb to make this setup
is the tc+htb work with my transparent bridge
thanks
hare
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Bridge+QOS
2003-03-17 6:55 [LARTC] Bridge+QOS hare ram
@ 2003-03-17 17:19 ` Stef Coene
2003-03-18 1:52 ` S Mohan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-03-17 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Monday 17 March 2003 08:04, hare ram wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services
>
> i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works
>
> i ahve setup like this
>
> LAN--eth1(Bridge)eth0--router--Internet
>
>
> in LAN i have users 10 people
> i would like to have QOS Services for 5 people burstable
> 5 People commited ( bounded b/w what i have)
>
> Can i use TC+htb to make this setup
yes
> is the tc+htb work with my transparent bridge
yes.
You have to shape on eth0 and eth1. Just like you should do on a normal
router.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [LARTC] Bridge+QOS
2003-03-17 6:55 [LARTC] Bridge+QOS hare ram
2003-03-17 17:19 ` Stef Coene
@ 2003-03-18 1:52 ` S Mohan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: S Mohan @ 2003-03-18 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Works very well. Have been using it for 8 months so. Bridging provides
transparency on network and does not affect the tc operation in any
manner. If you want marking of packets and routing based on fwmark, then
you'll have to juggle a bit as the packet flow in a bridge is different
from that of a router. Marking is possible only on the FORWARD
Chain/table. Alternatively, you can force packets thro' iptables chains
- prerouting, nat, input, forward, postrouting, output using ebtables.
I'm not sure if ebtables can mark packets. Have not looked deep enough.
Mohan
-----Original Message-----
From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl]
On Behalf Of hare ram
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:35 PM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] Bridge+QOS
Hi all
iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services
i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works
i ahve setup like this
LAN--eth1(Bridge)eth0--router--Internet
in LAN i have users 10 people
i would like to have QOS Services for 5 people burstable
5 People commited ( bounded b/w what i have)
Can i use TC+htb to make this setup
is the tc+htb work with my transparent bridge
thanks
hare
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [LARTC] bridge & QoS
@ 2006-02-17 2:14 Roberto Scattini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roberto Scattini @ 2006-02-17 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
hi everybody.
i have a bridge, and i want to apply QoS with htb and layer7 on both
interfaces(eth0 and eth1), should i apply qdiscs and classes to each
individual interface (eth0 and eth1, not br0)?
if someone is using layer7, which is the right place to put the iptables
rules to assure that all packets (fom internet to LAN and viceversa) get
analyzed for layer7 patterns, including those that are for/from the bridge
(it will have an ip address)? (maybe iptables -A POSTROUTING -m layer7
--l7proto someproto -j MARK --set-mark 3 ?)
thanks in advance.
Roberto Scattini
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Amor: busca tu ½ naranja http://latam.msn.com/amor/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-17 2:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-17 6:55 [LARTC] Bridge+QOS hare ram
2003-03-17 17:19 ` Stef Coene
2003-03-18 1:52 ` S Mohan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-17 2:14 [LARTC] bridge & QoS Roberto Scattini
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.