All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help
@ 2003-04-17  9:47 Stef Coene
  2003-04-17  9:55 ` hare ram
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-04-17  9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

On Thursday 17 April 2003 11:43, hare ram wrote:
> Hi all Guru's
>
> I have been try to work on this IMQ more than 4 weeks but i could not get
> any results
> really and badly need to help to achive my setup
>
> iam trying to achieve is up+down=total bandwidth, as per the user groups
> suggestion
> i would like to use IMQ to make my setup to achive this
>
> my setup is , RH 9.0 with patch bridge-nf
> and patched IMQ with iptables 1.2.8 and POM also done
> HTB also patched with latest ip route
>
> my bridge is running fine, iam able to use transparent bridge, working that
> also
>
> laptop---switch--eth1(bridge)eht0--switch--Router--internet
>
>
> next i have executed small example
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
> ----
> " when i executed above line i got this message
> [root@bridge root]# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev
> 0
> iptables: target `IMQ' v1.2.6a (I'm v1.2.8).
> ----
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 20 -m state --state
> ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 1
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -m state --state
> ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 2
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 25 -m state --state
> ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 3

This is your problem.  I think the iptables rule is not added.  But don't ask 
me why.  Maybe you use the wrong iptables version?  I don't know.  

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help
  2003-04-17  9:47 [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help Stef Coene
@ 2003-04-17  9:55 ` hare ram
  2003-04-17 10:12 ` hare ram
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hare ram @ 2003-04-17  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Hi all Guru's

I have been try to work on this IMQ more than 4 weeks but i could not get
any results
really and badly need to help to achive my setup

iam trying to achieve is up+down=total bandwidth, as per the user groups
suggestion
i would like to use IMQ to make my setup to achive this

my setup is , RH 9.0 with patch bridge-nf
and patched IMQ with iptables 1.2.8 and POM also done
HTB also patched with latest ip route

my bridge is running fine, iam able to use transparent bridge, working that
also

laptop---switch--eth1(bridge)eht0--switch--Router--internet


next i have executed small example

modprobe imq numdevs=1

tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 64kbit

tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5
tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 12kbit burst 16kbit
prio 3
tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:2 htb rate 28kbit burst 16kbit
prio 2
tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:3 htb rate 16kbit burst 16kbit
prio 1
tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:5 htb rate 8kbit prio 4

tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 10:1 handle 21:0 sfq
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 10:2 handle 22:0 sfq
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 10:3 handle 23:0 sfq
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 10:5 handle 24:0 sfq

tc filter add dev imq0 protocol ip pref 1 parent 10: handle 1 fw classid
10:1
tc filter add dev imq0 protocol ip pref 2 parent 10: handle 2 fw classid
10:2
tc filter add dev imq0 protocol ip pref 3 parent 10: handle 3 fw classid
10:3

iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
----
" when i executed above line i got this message
[root@bridge root]# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev
0
iptables: target `IMQ' v1.2.6a (I'm v1.2.8).
----

iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 20 -m state --state
ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -m state --state
ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 2
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 25 -m state --state
ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 3

ip link set imq0 up


iam able to see the packet when i try to browse using my laptop to yahoo.com
see below


[root@bridge root]# iptables -xvnL -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 10929 packets, 1105430 bytes)
    pkts      bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
destination
       0        0 MARK       tcp  --  eth1   *       0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0          tcp dpt:20 state ESTABLISHED MARK set 0x1
      42     5053 MARK       tcp  --  eth1   *       0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0          tcp dpt:80 state ESTABLISHED MARK set 0x2
       0        0 MARK       tcp  --  eth1   *       0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0          tcp dpt:25 state ESTABLISHED MARK set 0x3



but iam not able to see any traffic on imq0, see the out put below


br0       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:00:00:CB:3B
          inet addr:202.x.x.7  Bcast:202.x.x.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:16647 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2145 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:1040336 (1015.9 Kb)  TX bytes:402909 (393.4 Kb)

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:x:x:x:3B
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:18992 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:4908 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:1 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:1759678 (1.6 Mb)  TX bytes:605918 (591.7 Kb)
          Interrupt:15 Base address:0x3000

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:80:48:x:x:xx
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:2773 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:16615 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:202939 (198.1 Kb)  TX bytes:1590493 (1.5 Mb)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xc800

imq0      Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr
00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
          UP RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:30
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)



when i take the TC out out

[root@bridge root]# tc -s class ls dev imq0
class htb 10:1 root leaf 21: prio 3 rate 12Kbit ceil 12Kbit burst 2Kb cburst
1614b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: 1092266 ctokens: 861333

class htb 10:2 root leaf 22: prio 2 rate 28Kbit ceil 28Kbit burst 2Kb cburst
1634b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: 468113 ctokens: 373714

class htb 10:3 root leaf 23: prio 1 rate 16Kbit ceil 16Kbit burst 2Kb cburst
1619b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: 819200 ctokens: 647999

class htb 10:5 root leaf 24: prio 4 rate 8Kbit ceil 8Kbit burst 1609b cburst
1609b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: 1287999 ctokens: 1287999

class htb 1:1 root leaf 10: prio 0 rate 64Kbit ceil 64Kbit burst 1680b
cburst 1680b
 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
 tokens: 168099 ctokens: 168099


all are 0 bytes

iam not sure what is wrong, any expert coment will be appriciate

hare


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help
  2003-04-17  9:47 [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help Stef Coene
  2003-04-17  9:55 ` hare ram
@ 2003-04-17 10:12 ` hare ram
  2003-04-17 10:13 ` Stef Coene
  2003-04-17 13:16 ` Patrick McHardy
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hare ram @ 2003-04-17 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Do you thing its iptables problem
even i have cheked with iptables 1.2.7a
still iam not succeeded

when i make rules with out IMQ, iam able to see all the traffic
even postrouting and prerouting

really confusing this,

hare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "hare ram" <hareram@sol.net.in>; <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help


> On Thursday 17 April 2003 11:43, hare ram wrote:
> > Hi all Guru's
> >
> > I have been try to work on this IMQ more than 4 weeks but i could not
get
> > any results
> > really and badly need to help to achive my setup
> >
> > iam trying to achieve is up+down=total bandwidth, as per the user groups
> > suggestion
> > i would like to use IMQ to make my setup to achive this
> >
> > my setup is , RH 9.0 with patch bridge-nf
> > and patched IMQ with iptables 1.2.8 and POM also done
> > HTB also patched with latest ip route
> >
> > my bridge is running fine, iam able to use transparent bridge, working
that
> > also
> >
> > laptop---switch--eth1(bridge)eht0--switch--Router--internet
> >
> >
> > next i have executed small example
> >
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0
> > ----
> > " when i executed above line i got this message
> > [root@bridge root]# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j
IMQ --todev
> > 0
> > iptables: target `IMQ' v1.2.6a (I'm v1.2.8).
> > ----
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 20 -m
state --state
> > ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 1
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -m
state --state
> > ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 2
> > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 25 -m
state --state
> > ESTABLISHED -j MARK --set-mark 3
>
> This is your problem.  I think the iptables rule is not added.  But don't
ask
> me why.  Maybe you use the wrong iptables version?  I don't know.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
>  "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
>      http://www.docum.org/
>      #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help
  2003-04-17  9:47 [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help Stef Coene
  2003-04-17  9:55 ` hare ram
  2003-04-17 10:12 ` hare ram
@ 2003-04-17 10:13 ` Stef Coene
  2003-04-17 13:16 ` Patrick McHardy
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-04-17 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

On Thursday 17 April 2003 12:00, hare ram wrote:
> Do you thing its iptables problem
> even i have cheked with iptables 1.2.7a
> still iam not succeeded
Mhh.

> when i make rules with out IMQ, iam able to see all the traffic
> even postrouting and prerouting
>
> really confusing this,
I know there are members of this list using imq.  Maybe they can help?  
Anyone?  Hallo?

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help
  2003-04-17  9:47 [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help Stef Coene
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2003-04-17 10:13 ` Stef Coene
@ 2003-04-17 13:16 ` Patrick McHardy
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2003-04-17 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

It sounds like the imq target shared libraries were not
compiled. You need to replace NETFILTER_VERSION by
IPTABLES_VERSION in libipt_IMQ.c and libip6t_IMQ.c

Patrick

hare ram wrote:

>>>iptables: target `IMQ' v1.2.6a (I'm v1.2.8).
>>>      
>>>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-17 13:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-17  9:47 [LARTC] IMQ problem -- badly need help Stef Coene
2003-04-17  9:55 ` hare ram
2003-04-17 10:12 ` hare ram
2003-04-17 10:13 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-17 13:16 ` Patrick McHardy

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.