From: "rio@martin.mu" <rio@martin.mu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 03:12:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105089481903499@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105074710025619@msgid-missing>
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Martin A. Brown mabrown-lartc@securepipe.com
>I would suggest the following configuration (as Stef has proposed):
> 128kbit ceil 128kbit +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.1
> | |
> +---------------+---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.2
> |
> +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.3
> |
> +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.4
>Now, you have four different classes, one for each IP. Each IP is
>guaranteed 128kbit. Each IP can consume up to 128kbit, if there isn't
>competition with other classes.
Dear Martin,
I ve implemented before just exactly as you have described above, but the
main problem was when some host, 192.168.1.4 for example, use DAP that open
about 10 tcp streams, that host will get 128Kbit maximum when the other
hosts in idle connection. But as soon as other host up and request for
bandwidth, 192.168.1.4 wont decrease the speed of download into 32Kbit. I
wonder why this is happened ?
Regards,
Rio Martin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-21 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-19 10:10 RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager GoMi
2003-04-19 12:01 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-19 13:53 ` GoMi
2003-04-19 14:36 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-19 15:19 ` rio
2003-04-20 21:51 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-21 1:59 ` rio
2003-04-21 2:30 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-04-21 3:12 ` rio [this message]
2003-04-21 9:12 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-21 9:15 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-21 9:24 ` rio
2003-04-21 9:28 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105089481903499@msgid-missing \
--to=rio@martin.mu \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.