Re: RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager

[Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>]

On Monday 21 April 2003 04:30, Martin A. Brown wrote:
> Rio,
>
>  : I give you real situation in my network:
>  :
>  :  eth0[PUBLIC.IP]
>  : LINUX - BW - Manager
>  :  eth1[192.168.1.10]
>  :
>  :
>  : 4 hosts: 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.4
>  :
>  : My total bandwidth is only 128Kbit
>  : All NICs are Realtek 10Mbit
>  :
>  : So the solution as you offered is to put each class 128Kbit/4 = 32Kbit?
>  : If that so, then it would be good if i use CBQ qdisc, not HTB. I want to
>  : use HTB because HTB burstable.
>
> I would suggest the following configuration (as Stef has proposed):
>
>  128kbit ceil 128kbit    +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.1
>
>          +---------------+---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.2
>
>                          +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.3
>
>                          +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <-- 192.168.1.4
>
> Now, you have four different classes, one for each IP.  Each IP is
> guaranteed 128kbit.  
Each IP Is guaranteed 32 kbit, not 128 kbit.

> Each IP can consume up to 128kbit, if there isn't
> competition with other classes.
>
> You should use the qdisc with which you are most comfortable--both CBQ and
> HTB can do this for you.  For reference, it seems that the experience on
> this list leans toward HTB, though.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/