From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:51:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105087584326549@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105074710025619@msgid-missing>
On Saturday 19 April 2003 17:19, rio@martin.mu wrote:
> On Saturday 19 April 2003 12:10, GoMi wrote:
> Hi Stef, Are u sure havent heard DAP before ? this is as same as prozilla
> under linux.
My average downloads are 400kbyte/s so I don't need a download accelerator to
speed up downloads :)
> >And if they do, how many? And the other services that suffers from these
> >DAP
> >streams, is that also download (bulk traffic) or interactive traffic (ssh,
> >telnet, dns)?
> >And I suppose the DAP traffic and the other traffic belongs to different
> >classes.
>
> Maximum 10 connections to the same destination server. If they open 1 DAP.
> Sadly my users often download with 3 - 5 DAP. So when i sniff their
> connection, the results of tcp connection arrount 30 tcp connection to
> remote host port 80.
So it's just parallel tcp sessions to the same hosts. But if you put the
traffic from each host in 1 class, each class (and so each host) has the same
right for bandwidth.
> DAP is badly sucks my total bandwidth. So all other traffic would be very
> slow and didnt get fair bandwidth as i located..
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-20 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-19 10:10 RV: [LARTC] Re: My 1st BW Manager GoMi
2003-04-19 12:01 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-19 13:53 ` GoMi
2003-04-19 14:36 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-19 15:19 ` rio
2003-04-20 21:51 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-04-21 1:59 ` rio
2003-04-21 2:30 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-04-21 3:12 ` rio
2003-04-21 9:12 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-21 9:15 ` Stef Coene
2003-04-21 9:24 ` rio
2003-04-21 9:28 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105087584326549@msgid-missing \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.