[LARTC] dsmark, unkown

[LARTC] dsmark, unkown

[sun reflex4]

Hi,
I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although I 
have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel recompiled.

I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with 
already precompiled HTB queue).

Can anybody find the problem?

thx

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/virus

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown

[Martin A. Brown]

Hello there,

 : I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although I
 : have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel recompiled.

Not only must the kernel support diffserv/dsmark, but so must your
iproute2 distribution.

 : I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with
 : already precompiled HTB queue).

Try recompiling iproute2 after setting TC_CONFIG_DIFFSERV=y.

If you like RPMs, you can always try building my RPM (written for RH, not
SuSE).

  http://linux-ip.net/traffic-control/iproute-2.4.7-7.src.rpm  *

-Martin

* Note, this includes the HTB patch for tc as well as compiling with
  diffserv support.  There is no warranty express or implied.

-- 
Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown

[Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira]

On Wednesday 07 May 2003 18:34, sun reflex4 wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although I
> have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel recompiled.
>
> I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with
> already precompiled HTB queue).
>
> Can anybody find the problem?

You have to enable Diffserv support in iproute2.

Look at http://diffserv.sourceforge.net/ in iproute2 section.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown

[sun reflex4]

thanx for the help, it was bec. of the tc, i downloaded the source and 
"make"ed it. But the old one I had supports the HTB, whereas the new binary 
doesn't support it (but dsmark already), is it a problem when I use both 
(one called tc & the other tc_new)?



>From: "Martin A. Brown" <mabrown-lartc@securepipe.com>
>To: sun reflex4 <sunreflex4@hotmail.com>
>CC: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
>Subject: Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown
>Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 12:50:58 -0500 (CDT)
>
>Hello there,
>
>  : I want to use the dsmark, but it always says: "unkown qdisc", although 
>I
>  : have enabled it (y in Network options), and I have my kernel 
>recompiled.
>
>Not only must the kernel support diffserv/dsmark, but so must your
>iproute2 distribution.
>
>  : I am using SuSE 8.1, 2.4.20 Kernel, tc available at the HTB site (with
>  : already precompiled HTB queue).
>
>Try recompiling iproute2 after setting TC_CONFIG_DIFFSERV=y.
>
>If you like RPMs, you can always try building my RPM (written for RH, not
>SuSE).
>
>   http://linux-ip.net/traffic-control/iproute-2.4.7-7.src.rpm  *
>
>-Martin
>
>* Note, this includes the HTB patch for tc as well as compiling with
>   diffserv support.  There is no warranty express or implied.
>
>--
>Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid963

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown

[Martin A. Brown]

Well,

 : thanx for the help, it was bec. of the tc, i downloaded the source and
 : "make"ed it. But the old one I had supports the HTB, whereas the new
 : binary doesn't support it (but dsmark already), is it a problem when I
 : use both (one called tc & the other tc_new)?

I don't really know whether that's advisable or not.  I do not know of any
problem this can cause, but why not try applying the htb patch [1]?  It's
not so hard, and then you have a single binary to call instead of two
different binaries.

Maybe somebody else can answer your question about potential problems of
using multiple tc binaries.  Frankly, I think it's probably mostly
confusing for the human.

-Martin

 [1]  http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz

-- 
Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/