All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:03:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106562193732619@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106562149532078@msgid-missing>

Hello Anton,

Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:

I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.

AY> Hello,

AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. 
AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC 
AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached 
AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more 
AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and 
AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the 
AY> same issue? thanks




-- 
Best regards,
 Denis                            mailto:admin@ams-sat.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-08 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat [this message]
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09  8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106562193732619@msgid-missing \
    --to=nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.