All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:45:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106571838401152@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106562149532078@msgid-missing>

On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:44, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
> nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com wrote:
> >Hello Anton,
> >
> >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and
> >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem.
> >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass
> >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think
> >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate
> >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum.
>
> the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how
> can this be?
What's the output of
tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0
tc -s -d class show dev eth0

Stef

-- 
stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-09 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-08 13:49 [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2? Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-08 14:03 ` nuclearcat
2003-10-08 14:11 ` Lawrence MacIntyre
2003-10-08 16:56 ` Wilfried Weissmann
2003-10-09  8:44 ` Anton Yurchenko
2003-10-09 16:45 ` Stef Coene [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106571838401152@msgid-missing \
    --to=stef.coene@docum.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.