[LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF

[LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF

[Artūras Šlajus]

Hello,

   I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with
several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
job, but it's only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine's 2.4.22.
   So what is better: SFQ or TBF?
-- 
Artūras Šlajus



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF

[Laradji nacer]

Le Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Art??ras ?lajus a écrit:
> Hello,
> 
>   I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with
> several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
> Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
> job, but it's only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine's 2.4.22.
>   So what is better: SFQ or TBF?
Hello,
The best is sfq for what you want .

-- 
Laradji nacer <n.laradji@ovea.net>
Ovea SARL Tel : 06 21 64 17 35 Fax: 04 67 04 53 24
http://www.ovea.net Vos solutions informatiques
1024D/7017ADFF : 7B5F 72A8 6094 0311 73D3  3DED 0FA8 28FF 7017 ADFF


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF

[jzeeff]

ESFQ.  Unlike SFQ, it allows you to use source address to define queues.

Lot's of people want this type of fair queuing, it should be standard in the
kernel.

> Hello,
> 
>    I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with
> several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
> Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
> job, but it's only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine's 2.4.22.
>    So what is better: SFQ or TBF?

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF

[Steen Suder, privat]

Artūras Šlajus wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>   I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with
> several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
> Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
> job, but it's only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine's 2.4.22.
>   So what is better: SFQ or TBF?

I use wrr on 2.4.23 with succes.

-- 
Mvh. / Best regards,
Steen Suder		<http://www.suder.dk/>
ICQ UIN			4133803

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/