* [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays
@ 2003-12-21 15:31 Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
2003-12-22 16:03 ` Stef Coene
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Yat-Tung Cheung @ 2003-12-21 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 446 bytes --]
Hi All,
I would like to be able to simulate network congestion and delay on
tcp/udp connections between two hosts. I would need to simulate packet
lost and packet delay.
I think I would need to use a Linux box with two network cards to act as
a pass-through ethernet bridge. Is it the case? Does this how-to guide
provides good information in this area?
Thank you very much! Any advice will be much appreciated.
Best Regards,
Tony Cheung
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 804 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays
2003-12-21 15:31 [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
@ 2003-12-22 16:03 ` Stef Coene
2003-12-24 9:02 ` [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How to Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
2003-12-24 21:13 ` [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How toset andybr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-12-22 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Sunday 21 December 2003 16:31, Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to be able to simulate network congestion and delay on
> tcp/udp connections between two hosts. I would need to simulate packet
> lost and packet delay.
>
> I think I would need to use a Linux box with two network cards to act as
> a pass-through ethernet bridge. Is it the case? Does this how-to guide
> provides good information in this area?
http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistnet/
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How to
2003-12-21 15:31 [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
2003-12-22 16:03 ` Stef Coene
@ 2003-12-24 9:02 ` Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
2003-12-24 21:13 ` [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How toset andybr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Yat-Tung Cheung @ 2003-12-24 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1611 bytes --]
>From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
>To: tony.cheung@asiayeah.com,
> Tony Yat-Tung Cheung <dragonman@asiayeah.com>, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
>Subject: Re: [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays
>Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:03:27 +0100
>
>On Sunday 21 December 2003 16:31, Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote:
>
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I would like to be able to simulate network congestion and delay on
>>tcp/udp connections between two hosts. I would need to simulate packet
>>lost and packet delay.
>>
>>I think I would need to use a Linux box with two network cards to act as
>>a pass-through ethernet bridge. Is it the case? Does this how-to guide
>>provides good information in this area?
>>
>>
>http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistnet/
>
>Stef
>
>
Hi Stef and others,
Thanks. The NISTNET looks like a very decent package. I have tried it
briefly on a Red Hat 7.2 and it seems to work fine.
I have another basic question and I would if anyone could help me out.
Basically, I am trying a setup a Linux router between two local subnets,
192.168.0.1/24 and 192.168.1.1/24. My Linux box has two ethernet cards,
eth0 has IP address 192.168.0.1 (subnet mask 255.255.255.0) and eth1 has
IP address 192.168.1.1 (subnet mask: 255.255.255.0). Now I wish my Linux
box to be able to route traffic between eth0 and eth1.
I have modified '/etc/sysctl.conf' to,
# Controls IP packet forwarding
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
However, it doesn't seem to work right now. Is there anything else I
need to do? I wish to set it up quickly and would appreciate any advice!
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Tony Cheung
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2507 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How toset
2003-12-21 15:31 [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
2003-12-22 16:03 ` Stef Coene
2003-12-24 9:02 ` [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How to Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
@ 2003-12-24 21:13 ` andybr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: andybr @ 2003-12-24 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Did you try a traceroute from subnet so you can see
where fails because if you a linux box with two nics,
eth0: 192.168.0.1/24 and eth1: 192.168.1.1/24, behind
the linux computer A: 192.168.0.2/24 gw 192.168.0.1,
computer B: 192.168.1.2/24 gw 192.168.1.1, you must be
able to ping from a to b or vice-versa unless if you set
a rule to not do it. Check it out and return.
[]´s
Anderson
>
> >From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
> >To: tony.cheung@asiayeah.com,
> > Tony Yat-
Tung Cheung <dragonman@asiayeah.com>, lartc@mailman.ds9a.
nl
> >Subject: Re: [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and P
acket Delays
> >Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:03:27 +0100
> >
> >On Sunday 21 December 2003 16:31, Tony Yat-
Tung Cheung wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>I would like to be able to simulate network congestio
n and delay on
> >>tcp/udp connections between two hosts. I would need t
o simulate packet
> >>lost and packet delay.
> >>
> >>I think I would need to use a Linux box with two netw
ork cards to act as
> >>a pass-
through ethernet bridge. Is it the case? Does this how-
to guide
> >>provides good information in this area?
> >>
> >>
> >http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/itg/nistnet/
> >
> >Stef
> >
> >
> Hi Stef and others,
>
> Thanks. The NISTNET looks like a very decent package. I
have tried it
> briefly on a Red Hat 7.2 and it seems to work fine.
>
> I have another basic question and I would if anyone cou
ld help me out.
>
> Basically, I am trying a setup a Linux router between t
wo local subnets,
> 192.168.0.1/24 and 192.168.1.1/24. My Linux box has two
ethernet cards,
> eth0 has IP address 192.168.0.1 (subnet mask 255.255.25
5.0) and eth1 has
> IP address 192.168.1.1 (subnet mask: 255.255.255.0). No
w I wish my Linux
> box to be able to route traffic between eth0 and eth1.
>
> I have modified '/etc/sysctl.conf' to,
>
> # Controls IP packet forwarding
> net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
>
> However, it doesn't seem to work right now. Is there an
ything else I
> need to do? I wish to set it up quickly and would appre
ciate any advice!
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best Regards,
> Tony Cheung
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela.
AntiPop-up UOL - É grátis!
http://antipopup.uol.com.br/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-24 21:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-21 15:31 [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
2003-12-22 16:03 ` Stef Coene
2003-12-24 9:02 ` [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How to Tony Yat-Tung Cheung
2003-12-24 21:13 ` [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays (How toset andybr
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.