[LARTC] PRIO, TBF, RED, WRR, CSZ, ....

[LARTC] PRIO, TBF, RED, WRR, CSZ, ....

[Rick Goh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 513 bytes --]

Hi all,
I would like to show CBQ works better at controlling bandwidth than PRIO, TBF, RED, WRR, CSZ, etc.

Is it possible to stream 3 flows of controlled bandwidth at say 5, 30, 65 Mbps from 1 server to 3 computers and then see how well each queueing discipline works??

I have tried only CBQ and it worked perfectly. BUT, i have not tried the rest. Apparently i am not sure how to set up the other disciplines and it seems like they require CBQ as parent in order to work. Is this true???


Regards.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1079 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] PRIO, TBF, RED, WRR, CSZ, ....

[Gregory Maxwell]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 05:48:01PM +0800, Rick Goh wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like to show CBQ works better at controlling bandwidth than PRIO, TBF, RED, WRR, CSZ, etc.

Why?

Each serves it's purpose. CBQ isn't that good for delay and jitter while CSZ
is.

 
> Is it possible to stream 3 flows of controlled bandwidth at say 5, 30, 65 Mbps from 1 server to 3 computers and then see how well each queueing discipline works??

Sure.
 


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/