From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dnyaneshwar Bhadane" <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 21:19:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163385@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007211417.2093611-13-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] xe: structured log location hardcoded to device instead of tile
--
commit 21686fbec5b38511b4c76320b0afbe7eefda858f
Author: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API
This commit replaces standard DRM log macros with structured xe_log API
functions in xe_vram.c. It intends to update the VRAM initialization path to
correctly report whether a "no CPU visible VRAM" error is at the tile or
device level depending on the caller's context.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
> index 2441ffe77edb2..d44a92e97195d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -254,8 +255,9 @@ static int vram_region_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_vram_region *vram,
> vram->io_size = min_t(u64, usable_size, remain_io_size);
>
> if (!vram->io_size) {
> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "%s without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.\n",
> - tile ? "Tile" : "Device");
> + xe_log_err_fatal(xe, VRAM, -ENODEV,
> + "%s without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.\n",
> + tile ? "Tile" : "Device");
[Severity: Medium]
Is it possible that passing xe unconditionally here causes the telemetry
metadata to incorrectly tag tile-specific errors as device-level errors?
The xe_log API deduces the structured log location from the pointer type of its
first argument. By passing the struct xe_device *xe pointer unconditionally,
the telemetry location appears to be permanently recorded as a device-level
error, while only the human-readable string receives the tile context.
Could the first argument conditionally pass the tile pointer when it is
non-NULL to fulfill the commit message's intent?
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007211417.2093611-1-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 21:14 [PATCH v5 00/12] drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] drm/xe/log: Add VRAM, PAT, and HWMON DRIVER_HARDWARE components Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:59 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] drm/xe/ggtt: Report GGTT errors using structured logging Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] drm/xe/hwmon: Report errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:01 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: Report BAR mapping " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] drm/xe/memirq: Report " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] drm/xe/reg_sr: Report save-restore " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 13:45 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] drm/xe/pat: Return error from xe_pat_init_early() on unknown platform Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] drm/xe/pat: Report missing PAT table using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] drm/xe/pci: Report unknown GMDID versions " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] drm/xe/lmtt: Report invalidation errors " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:07 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] drm/xe/vram: Report tile vs device VRAM visibility errors Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:25 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07 21:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-07 21:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-07 22:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-08 2:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163385@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.