* Auto IP configuration
@ 2003-06-10 1:25 Wei Ming Long
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei Ming Long @ 2003-06-10 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: <
Hi everyone,
I am thinking of setting up a wireless lan and hope to use my laptop as
wireless client with dynamic ip address, using dhcp & running netfilter on the
gateway. I use my laptop at office with a static ip address and configured
proxy server. My question is: Can netfilter do nat or packet filtering based
on mac address so that I do not have to change my network configurations each
time my network environment changes.
Scenario 1 - With only my laptop
Internet ------------- Linux Gateway (ip address = 192.1681.1, Netfilter +
DHCP + Squid) -------------- My laptop A (ip address = 192.168.1.1)(dynamic)
Scenario 2 - With my laptop & a friend's laptop
Internet ------------- Linux Gateway +-------------- My laptop A (ip address
= 192.168.1.1) (dynamic)
+
|
|
|
Friend's laptop B (ip address = 172.16.1.1)
(static),
All help greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Best regards
Matthew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* auto ip configuration
@ 2005-06-22 20:53 Unknown
2005-06-23 13:16 ` Unknown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Unknown @ 2005-06-22 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nf-devel
dear list,
you know about people, which have some static ip configuration on their
notebooks. they would like to connect to a smart gateway
without the need to change anything.
I would ask you whether this is possible to implement such a gateway
using netfilter.
I alredy build a working example with some tools and scripting
but it isn't really performant and it have a lot of "design errors".
Simple speaking it is a farpd running box, where all incoming requests
are logged through the bridging code. The Syslog output is piped
into a script and the requested ip is assigned to the lan interface.
Evil thing ;-)
I would preffer something like inverse SNAT/MASQUERADE.
The difference would be, that:
it applys to PREROUTING
it does mapping from a big subnet (maybe 0/0) to a singe address or a
range of addresses.
The farpd would point all clients to the gateway.
Having rp_filter disabled all misconfigured packets incoming on a lan
interface would be translated into a valid ip address.
Then the usual routing would take place.
The response packets would be back-natted into the clients idea of the
gateway address.
Would please someone give me a pointer.
Am I completly wrong with this?
regards
jaroslaw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: auto ip configuration
@ 2005-06-22 20:55 Gary W. Smith
2005-06-22 21:02 ` Unknown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gary W. Smith @ 2005-06-22 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel, nf-devel
Longshot but I think that it's called DHCP. Otherwise you would have to change something somewhere each time you plug up your laptop.
Gary
________________________________
From: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org on behalf of Unknown
Sent: Wed 6/22/2005 1:53 PM
To: nf-devel
Subject: auto ip configuration
dear list,
you know about people, which have some static ip configuration on their
notebooks. they would like to connect to a smart gateway
without the need to change anything.
I would ask you whether this is possible to implement such a gateway
using netfilter.
I alredy build a working example with some tools and scripting
but it isn't really performant and it have a lot of "design errors".
Simple speaking it is a farpd running box, where all incoming requests
are logged through the bridging code. The Syslog output is piped
into a script and the requested ip is assigned to the lan interface.
Evil thing ;-)
I would preffer something like inverse SNAT/MASQUERADE.
The difference would be, that:
it applys to PREROUTING
it does mapping from a big subnet (maybe 0/0) to a singe address or a
range of addresses.
The farpd would point all clients to the gateway.
Having rp_filter disabled all misconfigured packets incoming on a lan
interface would be translated into a valid ip address.
Then the usual routing would take place.
The response packets would be back-natted into the clients idea of the
gateway address.
Would please someone give me a pointer.
Am I completly wrong with this?
regards
jaroslaw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: auto ip configuration
2005-06-22 20:55 Gary W. Smith
@ 2005-06-22 21:02 ` Unknown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Unknown @ 2005-06-22 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary W. Smith; +Cc: nf-devel
hi Gary,
i heard about DHCP, but a lot of people out there does not.
they haven't any idea of ip. They admins configured they computers
not to use dhcp but STATIC ip configuration.
In such a case it would be nice to have a feature like described below.
regards
jaroslaw
Am Mittwoch, den 22.06.2005, 13:55 -0700 schrieb Gary W. Smith:
> Longshot but I think that it's called DHCP. Otherwise you would have to change something somewhere each time you plug up your laptop.
>
> Gary
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org on behalf of Unknown
> Sent: Wed 6/22/2005 1:53 PM
> To: nf-devel
> Subject: auto ip configuration
>
>
>
> dear list,
>
> you know about people, which have some static ip configuration on their
> notebooks. they would like to connect to a smart gateway
> without the need to change anything.
>
> I would ask you whether this is possible to implement such a gateway
> using netfilter.
>
> I alredy build a working example with some tools and scripting
> but it isn't really performant and it have a lot of "design errors".
> Simple speaking it is a farpd running box, where all incoming requests
> are logged through the bridging code. The Syslog output is piped
> into a script and the requested ip is assigned to the lan interface.
> Evil thing ;-)
>
> I would preffer something like inverse SNAT/MASQUERADE.
> The difference would be, that:
> it applys to PREROUTING
> it does mapping from a big subnet (maybe 0/0) to a singe address or a
> range of addresses.
>
> The farpd would point all clients to the gateway.
> Having rp_filter disabled all misconfigured packets incoming on a lan
> interface would be translated into a valid ip address.
> Then the usual routing would take place.
> The response packets would be back-natted into the clients idea of the
> gateway address.
>
> Would please someone give me a pointer.
> Am I completly wrong with this?
>
> regards
> jaroslaw
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: auto ip configuration
2005-06-22 20:53 auto ip configuration Unknown
@ 2005-06-23 13:16 ` Unknown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Unknown @ 2005-06-23 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
hello,
please could you developer have a look at the description below
and tell whethet there is the way to make it?
example scenario:
client host-------------------gateway--------------------internet
10.0.0.1-----------192.168.0.1_______213.39.239.123-------------->>>
It would be nice to have a iptables Target acting like SNAT/MASQUERADE
but in the PREROUTING table doing the inverse job.
The goal shoud be to translate not valid ip-addresses into valid local
address space, so user not being able to change their ip-setting could
surf the net.
I am not experienced in kernel hacking so i would preffer to donate for
your work if it is something no one would have but me.
thanks in advance
jaroslaw
> dear list,
>
> you know about people, which have some static ip configuration on their
> notebooks. they would like to connect to a smart gateway
> without the need to change anything.
>
> I would ask you whether this is possible to implement such a gateway
> using netfilter.
>
> I alredy build a working example with some tools and scripting
> but it isn't really performant and it have a lot of "design errors".
> Simple speaking it is a farpd running box, where all incoming requests
> are logged through the bridging code. The Syslog output is piped
> into a script and the requested ip is assigned to the lan interface.
> Evil thing ;-)
>
> I would preffer something like inverse SNAT/MASQUERADE.
> The difference would be, that:
> it applys to PREROUTING
> it does mapping from a big subnet (maybe 0/0) to a singe address or a
> range of addresses.
>
> The farpd would point all clients to the gateway.
> Having rp_filter disabled all misconfigured packets incoming on a lan
> interface would be translated into a valid ip address.
> Then the usual routing would take place.
> The response packets would be back-natted into the clients idea of the
> gateway address.
>
> Would please someone give me a pointer.
> Am I completly wrong with this?
>
> regards
> jaroslaw
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-23 13:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-10 1:25 Auto IP configuration Wei Ming Long
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-22 20:53 auto ip configuration Unknown
2005-06-23 13:16 ` Unknown
2005-06-22 20:55 Gary W. Smith
2005-06-22 21:02 ` Unknown
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.