From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ASoC topology header parsing refinement
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 08:29:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00e9e16f-87be-5585-3751-d605a2ceb326@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32df1cf8-8a57-7fc8-c694-6ddcc03fffca@intel.com>
On 5/26/20 7:40 AM, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> On 2020-05-21 9:48 AM, Keyon Jie wrote:
>> This small series is to optimize the header logging during the topology
>> parsing. This is verified work fine on both SOF and SST drivers
>> (bxt_rt298 with dfw_sst.bin).
>>
>> Change History:
>> v2:
>> - Change the internal used array to be 'static' to fix the issue
>> reported by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> - Add testing coverage including Intel SST driver also.
>>
>> v1:
>> - Initial version.
>>
>> Keyon Jie (2):
>> ASoC: topology: refine and log the header in the correct pass
>> ASoC: topology: remove the redundant pass checks
>>
>> sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>
>
> No regression after applying these and running through SST CI on cAVS
> 1.5+ (GLK) and 1.8 (CNL).
Can the tests be run on SKL/KBL? That's where the cAVS driver will be
used and where this patchset will have an impact.
Thanks!
> Given some comments on 1/2 though, believe it could be simplified.
>
> Czarek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-21 7:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] ASoC topology header parsing refinement Keyon Jie
2020-05-21 7:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: topology: refine and log the header in the correct pass Keyon Jie
2020-05-26 12:38 ` Cezary Rojewski
2020-05-26 14:45 ` Keyon Jie
2020-05-26 15:30 ` Cezary Rojewski
2020-05-27 1:17 ` Keyon Jie
2020-05-21 7:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: topology: remove the redundant pass checks Keyon Jie
2020-05-26 12:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ASoC topology header parsing refinement Cezary Rojewski
2020-05-26 13:29 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-05-27 1:05 ` Keyon Jie
2020-05-26 14:34 ` Keyon Jie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00e9e16f-87be-5585-3751-d605a2ceb326@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox