From: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: cezary.rojewski@intel.com, tiwai@suse.de,
Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: topology: remove the redundant pass checks
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 15:48:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521074847.71406-3-yang.jie@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200521074847.71406-1-yang.jie@linux.intel.com>
As we have check the 'pass' in the soc_elem_pass_load(), so no need to
check it again in each specific elem_load function, at the same time,
the tplg->pos will be reset to the next header base when the pass is
mismatched, so the increasing of the tplg->pos in these cases made no
sense. Here remove all of them.
Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>
---
sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 46 ++--------------------------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
index 70c0ff7ce13f..6f4269ffd84f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
@@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ static inline void soc_control_err(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
}
/* pass vendor data to component driver for processing */
-static int soc_tplg_vendor_load_(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
- struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr)
+static int soc_tplg_vendor_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
+ struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -268,16 +268,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_vendor_load_(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
return ret;
}
-/* pass vendor data to component driver for processing */
-static int soc_tplg_vendor_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
- struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr)
-{
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR)
- return 0;
-
- return soc_tplg_vendor_load_(tplg, hdr);
-}
-
/* optionally pass new dynamic widget to component driver. This is mainly for
* external widgets where we can assign private data/ops */
static int soc_tplg_widget_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
@@ -1127,12 +1117,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
int ret;
int i;
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER) {
- tplg->pos += le32_to_cpu(hdr->size) +
- le32_to_cpu(hdr->payload_size);
- return 0;
- }
-
dev_dbg(tplg->dev, "ASoC: adding %d kcontrols at 0x%lx\n", hdr->count,
soc_tplg_get_offset(tplg));
@@ -1204,14 +1188,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
count = le32_to_cpu(hdr->count);
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH) {
- tplg->pos +=
- le32_to_cpu(hdr->size) +
- le32_to_cpu(hdr->payload_size);
-
- return 0;
- }
-
if (soc_tplg_check_elem_count(tplg,
sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elem),
count, le32_to_cpu(hdr->payload_size), "graph")) {
@@ -1741,9 +1717,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
count = le32_to_cpu(hdr->count);
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET)
- return 0;
-
dev_dbg(tplg->dev, "ASoC: adding %d DAPM widgets\n", count);
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
@@ -2101,9 +2074,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
count = le32_to_cpu(hdr->count);
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI)
- return 0;
-
/* check the element size and count */
pcm = (struct snd_soc_tplg_pcm *)tplg->pos;
size = le32_to_cpu(pcm->size);
@@ -2386,12 +2356,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_link_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
count = le32_to_cpu(hdr->count);
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK) {
- tplg->pos += le32_to_cpu(hdr->size) +
- le32_to_cpu(hdr->payload_size);
- return 0;
- }
-
/* check the element size and count */
link = (struct snd_soc_tplg_link_config *)tplg->pos;
size = le32_to_cpu(link->size);
@@ -2528,9 +2492,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_dai_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
count = le32_to_cpu(hdr->count);
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI)
- return 0;
-
/* config the existing BE DAIs */
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
dai = (struct snd_soc_tplg_dai *)tplg->pos;
@@ -2610,9 +2571,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_manifest_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
bool abi_match;
int ret = 0;
- if (tplg->pass != SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST)
- return 0;
-
manifest = (struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest *)tplg->pos;
/* check ABI version by size, create a new manifest if abi not match */
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-21 7:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] ASoC topology header parsing refinement Keyon Jie
2020-05-21 7:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: topology: refine and log the header in the correct pass Keyon Jie
2020-05-26 12:38 ` Cezary Rojewski
2020-05-26 14:45 ` Keyon Jie
2020-05-26 15:30 ` Cezary Rojewski
2020-05-27 1:17 ` Keyon Jie
2020-05-21 7:48 ` Keyon Jie [this message]
2020-05-26 12:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ASoC topology header parsing refinement Cezary Rojewski
2020-05-26 13:29 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-05-27 1:05 ` Keyon Jie
2020-05-26 14:34 ` Keyon Jie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200521074847.71406-3-yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
--to=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox