Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de,
	"Péter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ranjani Sridharan" <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rander Wang" <rander.wang@intel.com>,
	vkoul@kernel.org, "Bard Liao" <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: codecs: soundwire: call pm_runtime_resume() in component probe
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:35:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ddc85ea-4e40-eb07-ee5b-8bc58514223d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqxNEjG19K/RbbFM@sirena.org.uk>



On 6/17/22 04:44, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
>> Make sure that the bus and codecs are pm_runtime active when the card
>> is registered/created. This avoid timeouts when accessing registers.
> 
>> +static int max98373_sdw_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = pm_runtime_resume(component->dev);
>> +	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> I'm not clear what the issue is here.  Is something that's accessing the
> registers forgetting to do a pm_runtime_get(), or doing that rather than
> using pm_runtime_get_sync()?  This doesn't feel safe or robust.

The context is that I have been trying to remove all timing dependencies
between components, and make sure that you can bind/unbind drivers in
any order, with the deferred probe making sure that all required
components are already probed. I started this after seeing reports of
kernel oopses when the machine driver was removed, and realizing that
the SoundWire bus itself didn't support bind/unbind tests by design.

In the case where you bind the machine driver after a delay, then the
bus might be suspended already, and there are cases where we see
timeouts for registers that are not regmap-managed (usually
vendor-specific stuff with an indirection mechanism), and even for
regmap the register read-write are cache-based when the bus is suspended.

What this patch does it make sure that the bus is operation when the
card is created. In usual cases, this is a no-op, this just helps with
corner test cases. It's not plugging a major hole in the pm_runtime
support, just fixing a programming sequence that was not tested before.

One possible objection is that we don't keep the reference and the bus
active until all components are probed. I tried doing this at the ASoC
core level, but that breaks all kinds of devices that have their own
quirky way of dealing with pm_runtime - specifically HDaudio and HDMI.
That's why I added this resume here.

Makes sense?


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-17 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-16 21:08 [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: SOF/soundwire: use resume_and_get on component probe Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-16 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: SOF: pcm: use pm_resume_and_get() " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-16 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: codecs: soundwire: call pm_runtime_resume() in " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-17  9:44   ` Mark Brown
2022-06-17 14:35     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-06-17 17:37       ` Mark Brown
2022-06-17 18:54         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-17 19:05           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-17 20:12             ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-18  0:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: SOF/soundwire: use resume_and_get on " Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ddc85ea-4e40-eb07-ee5b-8bc58514223d@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rander.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox