Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: large_config_get overhaul

[Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>]

On 2019-08-08 05:30, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>
>>> [1] here you are just saying that the looping is really not required 
>>> so there are no tests at all...
>>>
>>> [4] So shouldn't you split the two parts of this patch and separate 
>>> looping from not touching the data that's vendor-specific?
>>
>> So, looping mainly gets used in _sets_, for _gets_ I've not seen a 
>> live example, really - despite FW supporting such flow. However, I'd 
>> like to verify before adding any looping, possibly by creating a 
>> custom module myself. Followup to your point: existing looping was not 
>> tested either.
> 
> So how about removing this looping first in the existing code and add 
> the needed changes in a second patch? wouldn't that help make the 
> changes more self-contained? A large part of your patch below has 
> indentation differences which make it hard to figure out what the new 
> approach is.

Agreed. Must say, didn't get you at first.
Update v4 has been sent and should do a better job at guiding the reader 
through changes.

Czarek