From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: large_config_get overhaul
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:00:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b0e1051-946b-ea7c-1e09-93e0825e5ac8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190807134745.1648-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
I find this patch quite convoluted, so I ordered my comments to make
them linear.
> LARGE_CONFIG_GET is among the most crucial IPCs. Host is expected to
> send single request first to obtain total payload size from received
> header's data_off_size. From then on, it loops for each frame exceeding
> inbox size until entire payload is read. If entire payload is contained
> within the very first frame, no looping is performed.
so there's got to be a test that defines if looping is required or not
but see [1] below.
>
> LARGE_CONFIG_GET is a flexible IPC, it not only receives payload but may
> carry one with them to provide list of params DSP module should return
> info for. This behavior is usually reserved for vendors and IPC handler
> should not touch that content. To achieve that, simply pass provided
> payload and bytes to sst_ipc_tx_message_wait as a part of request.
[2] And this has nothing to do with the loops, does it?
> In current state, LARGE_CONFIG_GET message handler does nothing of that,
> in consequence making it dysfunctional. Overhaul said handler allowing
> rightful king of IPCs to return back on his throne - kingdom he shares
> with his twin brother: LARGE_CONFIG_SET.
[3] what is dysfunctional? the unnecessary loops or handling data in the
IPC that should only be handled in vendor-specific parts. And btw I
don't see vendor-specific parts in the Skylake driver, so not sure how
those vendor-specific thingies are handled at all.
> The looping has not been added in this update as payloads of such size
> do not exist in practice. Will need to create custom module specifically
> for that very case and test against it before that feature can be added.
[1] here you are just saying that the looping is really not required so
there are no tests at all...
[4] So shouldn't you split the two parts of this patch and separate
looping from not touching the data that's vendor-specific?
>
> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-messages.c | 3 +-
> sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c | 54 +++++++++++---------------
> sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.h | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-messages.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-messages.c
> index e8cc710f092b..84f0e6f58eb5 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-messages.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-messages.c
> @@ -1379,11 +1379,12 @@ int skl_get_module_params(struct skl_dev *skl, u32 *params, int size,
> u32 param_id, struct skl_module_cfg *mcfg)
> {
> struct skl_ipc_large_config_msg msg;
> + size_t bytes = size;
>
> msg.module_id = mcfg->id.module_id;
> msg.instance_id = mcfg->id.pvt_id;
> msg.param_data_size = size;
> msg.large_param_id = param_id;
>
> - return skl_ipc_get_large_config(&skl->ipc, &msg, params);
> + return skl_ipc_get_large_config(&skl->ipc, &msg, ¶ms, &bytes);
> }
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c
> index a2b69a02aab2..9d269a5f8bd9 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.c
> @@ -969,12 +969,17 @@ int skl_ipc_set_large_config(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skl_ipc_set_large_config);
>
> int skl_ipc_get_large_config(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc,
> - struct skl_ipc_large_config_msg *msg, u32 *param)
> + struct skl_ipc_large_config_msg *msg,
> + unsigned int **payload, size_t *bytes)
> {
> struct skl_ipc_header header = {0};
> - struct sst_ipc_message request = {0}, reply = {0};
> - int ret = 0;
> - size_t sz_remaining, rx_size, data_offset;
> + struct sst_ipc_message request, reply = {0};
> + unsigned int *buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + reply.data = kzalloc(SKL_ADSP_W1_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!reply.data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> header.primary = IPC_MSG_TARGET(IPC_MOD_MSG);
> header.primary |= IPC_MSG_DIR(IPC_MSG_REQUEST);
> @@ -987,34 +992,21 @@ int skl_ipc_get_large_config(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc,
> header.extension |= IPC_FINAL_BLOCK(1);
> header.extension |= IPC_INITIAL_BLOCK(1);
>
> - sz_remaining = msg->param_data_size;
> - data_offset = 0;
> -
> - while (sz_remaining != 0) {
> - rx_size = sz_remaining > SKL_ADSP_W1_SZ
> - ? SKL_ADSP_W1_SZ : sz_remaining;
> - if (rx_size == sz_remaining)
> - header.extension |= IPC_FINAL_BLOCK(1);
> -
> - request.header = *(u64 *)(&header);
> - reply.data = ((char *)param) + data_offset;
> - reply.size = msg->param_data_size;
> - ret = sst_ipc_tx_message_wait(ipc, request, &reply);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(ipc->dev,
> - "ipc: get large config fail, err: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - sz_remaining -= rx_size;
> - data_offset = msg->param_data_size - sz_remaining;
> + request.header = *(u64 *)&header;
> + request.data = *payload;
> + request.size = *bytes;
> + reply.size = SKL_ADSP_W1_SZ;
>
> - /* clear the fields */
> - header.extension &= IPC_INITIAL_BLOCK_CLEAR;
> - header.extension &= IPC_DATA_OFFSET_SZ_CLEAR;
> - /* fill the fields */
> - header.extension |= IPC_INITIAL_BLOCK(1);
> - header.extension |= IPC_DATA_OFFSET_SZ(data_offset);
> - }
> + ret = sst_ipc_tx_message_wait(ipc, request, &reply);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(ipc->dev, "ipc: get large config fail: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + reply.size = (reply.header >> 32) & IPC_DATA_OFFSET_SZ_MASK;
> + buf = krealloc(reply.data, reply.size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + *payload = buf;
> + *bytes = reply.size;
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.h b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.h
> index 93af08cf41d2..a7ab2c589cc5 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.h
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-ipc.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ int skl_ipc_set_large_config(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc,
> struct skl_ipc_large_config_msg *msg, u32 *param);
>
> int skl_ipc_get_large_config(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc,
> - struct skl_ipc_large_config_msg *msg, u32 *param);
> + struct skl_ipc_large_config_msg *msg,
> + unsigned int **payload, size_t *bytes);
>
> int skl_sst_ipc_load_library(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc,
> u8 dma_id, u8 table_id, bool wait);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-07 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 13:47 [RESEND PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: large_config_get overhaul Cezary Rojewski
2019-08-07 20:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-08-07 20:51 ` Cezary Rojewski
2019-08-08 3:30 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-08 10:31 ` Cezary Rojewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b0e1051-946b-ea7c-1e09-93e0825e5ac8@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox