From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Confusion about Playback/Capture, CODEC/CODEC links, and snd_soc_dapm_link_dai_widgets()
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 22:34:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605213447.GA12405@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FCE775B.7020901@wwwdotorg.org>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:17:15PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> So, should the logic be something like this early-ish in
> snd_soc_instantiate_card():
> for every dai link:
> if cpu side is a codec and it isn't probed
> probe it
> if codec side isn't probed
> probe it
> something similar for aux devs
> something similar for platforms?
> And modify soc_probe_dai_link() to only probe DAIs, never anything else.
Yeah, something like this.
> Is the following loop still required:
> > /* early DAI link probe */
> > for (order = SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_FIRST; order <= SND_SOC_COMP_ORDER_LAST;
> > order++) {
> I'm not sure what the probe ordering stuff is achieving, and whether
> it's really intended for just CPU DAIs, just all DAIs, just CODECS,
> everything...
The only user of that is OMAP, I can't remember if they've actually got
their users for that upstream or not. IIRC it's there to resolve clock
order dependencies but I'm not sure there isn't a neater solution with
something like cache only register I/O especially now we've got better
infrastructure. Or if we can add something based on having a usable
clock API, we can rely on but that doesn't seem too realistic in the
medium term.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 22:49 Confusing about Playback/Capture, CODEC/CODEC links, and snd_soc_dapm_link_dai_widgets() Stephen Warren
2012-05-31 23:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-01 17:01 ` Liam Girdwood
2012-06-04 13:02 ` Sebastien LEDUC
2012-06-04 16:57 ` Liam Girdwood
2012-06-01 21:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-01 22:31 ` Confusion " Stephen Warren
2012-06-05 20:24 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-05 20:48 ` Mark Brown
2012-06-05 21:17 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-05 21:34 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120605213447.GA12405@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox