Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>,
	vkoul@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	Gyeongtaek Lee <gt82.lee@samsung.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: fix trigger race conditions with shared BE
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:09:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29397354-dc5b-7837-c71b-df4bde707df2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcdb8f74-51db-86a1-959f-909dfac22b26@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1591 bytes --]


>> Basically we need to protect two things:
>> - The BE links
>> - The concurrent accesses to BEs
>> The former belongs to each FE that holds the links, and the FE stream
>> lock would cover.  The latter is rather a per-BE business.
>>
>> An oft-seen risk of multiple locks is deadlocking, but in this case,
>> as long as we keep the lock order FE->BE, nothing wrong can happen.
> 
> famous last words  "nothing wrong can happen." :-)
> 
> I already added a helper to do this FE lock, I can easily replace the
> implementation to remove the spin_lock and use the FE PCM lock.
> we might even add the lock in the definition of for_each_dpcm_be() to
> avoid misses.
> 
> Let me try this out today, thanks for the suggestions.

well, it's not successful at all...

When I replace the existing dpcm_lock with the FE PCM lock as you
suggested, without any additional changes, speaker-test produces valid
audio on the endpoints, but if I try a Ctrl-C or limit the number of
loops with the '-l' option, I hear an endless loop on the same buffer
and I have to power cycle my test device to stop the sound.

See 2 patches attached, the first patch with the introduction of the
helper works fine, the second with the use of the FE PCM lock doesn't.
In hindsight I am glad I worked on minimal patches, one after the other,
to identify problems.

And when I add the BE lock, then nothing happens. Device stuck and no
audio...

There must be something we're missing related to the locking...

My work version is at
https://github.com/plbossart/sound/tree/fix/dpcm-lock5 if anyone wants
to take a look.


[-- Attachment #2: 0002-ASoC-soc-pcm-remove-dpcm-spin_lock-use-PCM-stream-lo.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2147 bytes --]

From f0a7068b50057eb918821dbcda6d448f49f5f1c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:35:23 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: soc-pcm: remove dpcm spin_lock, use PCM stream lock

There is no need for a DPCM-specific lock at the card level, we can
use the FE-specific PCM lock instead. In addition, these PCM lock will
rely on either a spin-lock or a mutex depending on atomicity.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
---
 include/sound/soc.h  | 2 --
 sound/soc/soc-core.c | 1 -
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c  | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h
index 8e6dd8a257c5..5872a8864f3b 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc.h
@@ -893,8 +893,6 @@ struct snd_soc_card {
 	struct mutex pcm_mutex;
 	enum snd_soc_pcm_subclass pcm_subclass;
 
-	spinlock_t dpcm_lock;
-
 	int (*probe)(struct snd_soc_card *card);
 	int (*late_probe)(struct snd_soc_card *card);
 	int (*remove)(struct snd_soc_card *card);
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index c830e96afba2..51ef9917ca98 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -2339,7 +2339,6 @@ int snd_soc_register_card(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 	mutex_init(&card->mutex);
 	mutex_init(&card->dapm_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&card->pcm_mutex);
-	spin_lock_init(&card->dpcm_lock);
 
 	return snd_soc_bind_card(card);
 }
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index 52851827d53f..c1dbd8633587 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@
 
 void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 {
-	spin_lock_irq(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
+	snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(fe, stream));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq);
 
 void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 {
-	spin_unlock_irq(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
+	snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(fe, stream));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq);
 
-- 
2.25.1


[-- Attachment #3: 0001-ASoC-soc-pcm-introduce-snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq-unlo.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 7038 bytes --]

From c35ccac18235f6f50e2d0e9fb6167612dcc753f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:30:19 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: soc-pcm: introduce
 snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq/unlock_irq()

In preparation for more changes, add two new helpers to gradually
modify the DPCM locks.

Since DPCM functions are not used from interrupt handlers, we can only
use the lock_irq case.

While most of the uses of DPCM are internal to soc-pcm.c, some drivers
in soc/fsl and soc/sh do make use of DPCM-related loops that will
require protection, adding EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is needed for those
drivers.

The stream argument is unused in this patch but will be enabled in
follow-up patches.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
---
 include/sound/soc-dpcm.h |  3 +++
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c      | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
index 9c00118603e7..8ed40b8f3da8 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
@@ -151,4 +151,7 @@ bool dpcm_end_walk_at_be(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *widget, enum snd_soc_dapm_d
 #define dpcm_be_dai_startup_unwind(fe, stream)	dpcm_be_dai_stop(fe, stream, 0, NULL)
 #define dpcm_be_dai_shutdown(fe, stream)	dpcm_be_dai_stop(fe, stream, 1, NULL)
 
+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream);
+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index 19539300d94d..52851827d53f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -29,6 +29,18 @@
 
 #define DPCM_MAX_BE_USERS	8
 
+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
+{
+	spin_lock_irq(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq);
+
+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
+{
+	spin_unlock_irq(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq);
+
 /* can this BE stop and free */
 static int snd_soc_dpcm_can_be_free_stop(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 					 struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be, int stream);
@@ -85,7 +97,6 @@ static ssize_t dpcm_show_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 	struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params = &fe->dpcm[stream].hw_params;
 	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
 	ssize_t offset = 0;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* FE state */
 	offset += scnprintf(buf + offset, size - offset,
@@ -113,7 +124,7 @@ static ssize_t dpcm_show_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
 	for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) {
 		struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be = dpcm->be;
 		params = &dpcm->hw_params;
@@ -134,7 +145,7 @@ static ssize_t dpcm_show_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 					   params_channels(params),
 					   params_rate(params));
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
 out:
 	return offset;
 }
@@ -1141,7 +1152,6 @@ static int dpcm_be_connect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 		struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be, int stream)
 {
 	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* only add new dpcms */
 	for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) {
@@ -1157,10 +1167,10 @@ static int dpcm_be_connect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 	dpcm->fe = fe;
 	be->dpcm[stream].runtime = fe->dpcm[stream].runtime;
 	dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_NEW;
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
 	list_add(&dpcm->list_be, &fe->dpcm[stream].be_clients);
 	list_add(&dpcm->list_fe, &be->dpcm[stream].fe_clients);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
 
 	dev_dbg(fe->dev, "connected new DPCM %s path %s %s %s\n",
 			stream ? "capture" : "playback",  fe->dai_link->name,
@@ -1203,7 +1213,6 @@ static void dpcm_be_reparent(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 void dpcm_be_disconnect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 {
 	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm, *d;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, dpcm, d) {
 		dev_dbg(fe->dev, "ASoC: BE %s disconnect check for %s\n",
@@ -1222,10 +1231,10 @@ void dpcm_be_disconnect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 
 		dpcm_remove_debugfs_state(dpcm);
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+		snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
 		list_del(&dpcm->list_be);
 		list_del(&dpcm->list_fe);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+		snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
 		kfree(dpcm);
 	}
 }
@@ -1451,12 +1460,11 @@ int dpcm_process_paths(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 void dpcm_clear_pending_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 {
 	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
 	for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm)
 		dpcm_set_be_update_state(dpcm->be, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
 }
 
 void dpcm_be_dai_stop(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream,
@@ -2374,7 +2382,6 @@ static int dpcm_run_update_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
 	enum snd_soc_dpcm_trigger trigger = fe->dai_link->trigger[stream];
 	int ret = 0;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	dev_dbg(fe->dev, "ASoC: runtime %s open on FE %s\n",
 			stream ? "capture" : "playback", fe->dai_link->name);
@@ -2443,7 +2450,7 @@ static int dpcm_run_update_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 	dpcm_be_dai_shutdown(fe, stream);
 disconnect:
 	/* disconnect any pending BEs */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
 	for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) {
 		struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be = dpcm->be;
 
@@ -2455,7 +2462,7 @@ static int dpcm_run_update_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 			be->dpcm[stream].state == SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_NEW)
 				dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
 
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(fe->dev, "ASoC: %s() failed (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
@@ -2855,10 +2862,9 @@ static int snd_soc_dpcm_check_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
 	int state;
 	int ret = 1;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
 	for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm) {
 
 		if (dpcm->fe == fe)
@@ -2872,7 +2878,7 @@ static int snd_soc_dpcm_check_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+	snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
 
 	/* it's safe to do this BE DAI */
 	return ret;
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-08 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-04 22:54 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: fix trigger race conditions with shared BE Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: remove snd_soc_dpcm_fe_can_update() Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: don't export local functions, use static Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: replace dpcm_lock with dpcm_mutex Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: protect for_each_dpcm_be() loops " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: test refcount before triggering Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-05  6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: fix trigger race conditions with shared BE Sameer Pujar
2021-10-05 13:17   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-06 14:22     ` Sameer Pujar
2021-10-06 19:47       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 11:06         ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 13:31           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 14:59             ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 15:24               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 15:44                 ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 18:13                   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 21:11                     ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 21:27                       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-08  6:13                         ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-08 14:41                           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-08 14:51                             ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-08 15:41                               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-08 19:09                                 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2021-10-11 20:06                                   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-12  6:34                                     ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-12 10:42                                       ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-12 13:45                                         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-12 15:07                                           ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29397354-dc5b-7837-c71b-df4bde707df2@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gt82.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=spujar@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox