Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>,
	vkoul@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	Gyeongtaek Lee <gt82.lee@samsung.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: fix trigger race conditions with shared BE
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:27:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75894aba-ca1a-51d6-df7d-ad53fcd89f79@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hily88rri.wl-tiwai@suse.de>



>> I think the only solution is to follow the example of the PCM case,
>> where the type of lock depends on the FE types, with the assumption that
>> there are no mixed atomic/non-atomic FE configurations.
> 
> Yes, and I guess we can simply replace those all card->dpcm_lock with
> FE's stream lock.  It'll solve the atomicity problem, too, and the FE
> stream lock can be applied outside the loop of dpcm_be_disconnect()
> gracefully.
> 
> And, this should solve the race with dpcm_be_dai_trigger() as well,
> because it's called from dpcm_fe_dai_trigger() that is called already
> inside the FE's stream lock held by PCM core.  A PoC is something like
> below.  (I replaced the superfluous *_irqsave with *_irq there)

No I don't think so. The code starts from an FE and loops for all the
BEs connected to that FE, but we want to serialize at the BE level! we
really need a dpcm lock at the card level, not the FE/stream level.

I am testing a quick set of changes at
https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3201,  where I also replaced
irqsave by irq btw.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-07 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-04 22:54 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: fix trigger race conditions with shared BE Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: remove snd_soc_dpcm_fe_can_update() Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: don't export local functions, use static Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: replace dpcm_lock with dpcm_mutex Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: protect for_each_dpcm_be() loops " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: test refcount before triggering Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-05  6:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: soc-pcm: fix trigger race conditions with shared BE Sameer Pujar
2021-10-05 13:17   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-06 14:22     ` Sameer Pujar
2021-10-06 19:47       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 11:06         ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 13:31           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 14:59             ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 15:24               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 15:44                 ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 18:13                   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-07 21:11                     ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-07 21:27                       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2021-10-08  6:13                         ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-08 14:41                           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-08 14:51                             ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-08 15:41                               ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-08 19:09                                 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-11 20:06                                   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-12  6:34                                     ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-12 10:42                                       ` Takashi Iwai
2021-10-12 13:45                                         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-10-12 15:07                                           ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75894aba-ca1a-51d6-df7d-ad53fcd89f79@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gt82.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=spujar@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox