From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Brian Austin <brian.austin@cirrus.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] ASoC: Move IO and kcontrols to the component level
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:20:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53285626.2090209@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403180915510.14838@heelrod>
On 03/18/2014 03:17 PM, Brian Austin wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
>> At Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:02:03 +0100,
>> Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This series is the first step towards full componentisation of the ASoC
>>> core. It
>>> moves both the IO abstraction layers within ASoC as well as the standard
>>> set of
>>> kcontrols to the component level. This for example means we can get rid of
>>> constructs like
>>>
>>> if (w->codec)
>>> snd_soc_read(....)
>>> else if(w->platform)
>>> snd_soc_platform_read(...)
>>>
>>> Moving the kcontrols to the component level means we can use the same
>>> implementation also for other non-CODEC components. E.g. there seems to
>>> be an
>>> increasing amount of CPU components that have basic signal processing and
>>> things
>>> like volume controls etc. whose register layout is similar to those used in
>>> CODECs. Currently each CPU component driver re-implements these controls by
>>> hand.
>>>
>>> The first two patches introduce two new helper functions which hide the
>>> actual
>>> implementation on how the CODEC or platform struct that register a
>>> control can
>>> be obtained from the control. This means that when the actual
>>> implementation is
>>> changed only the two helper functions need to be updated and not every
>>> single
>>> driver. The patches that follow that are just cleanups removing unused IO
>>> stuff
>>> and move all IO functions to soc-io.c. The next step is to make platforms
>>> also
>>> components. And then finally first the IO abstraction layers in ASoC are
>>> unified
>>> at the component level and then on top of that the kcontrol helpers are
>>> moved to
>>> the component level.
>>>
>>> The series depends on quite a few topic branches related to changes to
>>> the core
>>> and cleanups for individual drivers. It is probably best to place it on
>>> top of
>>> asoc-v3.15-2. The patch that moves the kcontrols to the component level
>>> also has
>>> a runtime dependency on the not yet applied patches that move the
>>> ams-delta and
>>> mfld_machine controls to the card level.
>>
>> I'd love to have seen this one or two weeks ago, if this is intended
>> for 3.15 upstream. But I guess it's still OK if anyone can test the
>> stuff well.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Takashi
>>
> I don't see a [01/13] patch. It doesn't show up for some reason. I checked
> the archives as well and nothing.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
For some reason your mail server bounced the patches.
<brian.austin@cirrus.com>:
207.46.163.247 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host
[212.40.185.230] blocked using Blocklist 1; To request removal from this
list please forward this message to delist@messaging.microsoft.com
Giving up on 207.46.163.247.
patch 1 was also caught by the alsa-list spam filter as it was a bit to large.
- Lars
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-18 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 8:02 [PATCH 00/13] ASoC: Move IO and kcontrols to the component level Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 01/13] ASoC: Add snd_soc_kcontrol_codec() helper function Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-24 10:57 ` Charles Keepax
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 02/13] ASoC: Add snd_soc_kcontrol_platform() " Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 03/13] ASoC: Prepare SOC_SINGLE_XR_SX controls for regmap Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 04/13] ASoC: Move IO functions to soc-io.c Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 11:10 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 11:47 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 11:53 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 11:57 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 12:01 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 12:11 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 05/13] ASoC: Drop ASoC level caching from hw_write/hw_read Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 12:58 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 13:01 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 06/13] ASoC: Remove IO register modifier callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 07/13] ASoC: Add helper function to cast component back to CODEC Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 08/13] ASoC: Track which components have been registered with snd_soc_register_component() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-24 11:18 ` Charles Keepax
2014-03-24 11:33 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-24 11:40 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-24 11:48 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-24 12:07 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-24 12:26 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 09/13] ASoC: Let snd_soc_platform subclass snd_soc_component Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 10/13] ASoC: Move IO abstraction to the component level Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-02 18:23 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 11/13] ASoC: Move standard kcontrol helpers " Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 12/13] ASoC: Remove snd_soc_update_bits_locked() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:02 ` [PATCH 13/13] ASoC: dapm: Rename soc_widget_update_bits_locked() to soc_widget_update_bits() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 8:06 ` [PATCH 00/13] ASoC: Move IO and kcontrols to the component level Takashi Iwai
2014-03-18 8:25 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 14:17 ` Brian Austin
2014-03-18 14:20 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53285626.2090209@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=brian.austin@cirrus.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox