Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Brian Austin <brian.austin@cirrus.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] ASoC: Track which components have been registered with snd_soc_register_component()
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:40:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533019C1.6090402@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140324111805.GI1665@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On 03/24/2014 12:18 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:02:11AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> snd_soc_unregister_component() takes the parent device of the component as a
>> parameter and then looks up the component based on this. This is a problem if
>> multiple components are registered for the same parent device. Currently drivers
>> do not do this, but some drivers register a CPU DAI component and a platform for
>> the same parent device. This will become a problem once platforms are also made
>> components. To make sure that snd_soc_unregister_component() will not
>> accidentally unregister the platform in such a case only consider components
>> that were registered with snd_soc_register_component(). This is only meant as
>> short term stopgap solution to be able to continue componentisation. Long term
>> we'll need something different.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
>> ---
>
> Do we have any thoughts on what might be a longer term solution
> here? Is the parent device actually the right thing to pass to
> snd_soc_unregister_component, it feels like that is probably not
> going to be enough to accurately identify the component?
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>

My plan is to let it take a pointer to the component itself. I'm just not 
too sure about the implementation details yet.

- Lars

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-24 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-18  8:02 [PATCH 00/13] ASoC: Move IO and kcontrols to the component level Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 01/13] ASoC: Add snd_soc_kcontrol_codec() helper function Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-24 10:57   ` Charles Keepax
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 02/13] ASoC: Add snd_soc_kcontrol_platform() " Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 03/13] ASoC: Prepare SOC_SINGLE_XR_SX controls for regmap Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 04/13] ASoC: Move IO functions to soc-io.c Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 11:10   ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 11:47     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 11:53       ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 11:57         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 12:01           ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 12:11             ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 05/13] ASoC: Drop ASoC level caching from hw_write/hw_read Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 12:58   ` Mark Brown
2014-03-19 13:01     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 06/13] ASoC: Remove IO register modifier callbacks Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 07/13] ASoC: Add helper function to cast component back to CODEC Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-19 13:08   ` Mark Brown
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 08/13] ASoC: Track which components have been registered with snd_soc_register_component() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-24 11:18   ` Charles Keepax
2014-03-24 11:33     ` Mark Brown
2014-03-24 11:40     ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2014-03-24 11:48       ` Mark Brown
2014-03-24 12:07         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-24 12:26           ` Mark Brown
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 09/13] ASoC: Let snd_soc_platform subclass snd_soc_component Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 10/13] ASoC: Move IO abstraction to the component level Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-02 18:23   ` Mark Brown
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 11/13] ASoC: Move standard kcontrol helpers " Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 12/13] ASoC: Remove snd_soc_update_bits_locked() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:02 ` [PATCH 13/13] ASoC: dapm: Rename soc_widget_update_bits_locked() to soc_widget_update_bits() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18  8:06 ` [PATCH 00/13] ASoC: Move IO and kcontrols to the component level Takashi Iwai
2014-03-18  8:25   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-18 14:17   ` Brian Austin
2014-03-18 14:20     ` Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533019C1.6090402@metafoo.de \
    --to=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=brian.austin@cirrus.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox