From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Simon <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: stop all working stream when .remove
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:58:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h8thtnvyq.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5ho9qpnzs1.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
On Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:35:58 +0200,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:33:42 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:58:37 +0200,
> > Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Takashi-san
> > >
> > > Thank you for your feedback
> > >
> > > > Right, you can't cancel or return an error at that point.
> > > > That is, you'd need to sync (wait) until the all top-level operations are canceled at remove callback.
> > > >
> > > > For example, snd_card_free() processes the disconnection procedure at first,
> > > > then waits for the completion. That's how the hot-unplug works safely.
> > > > It's implemented, at least, in the top-level driver removal.
> > > >
> > > > Now for the lower level driver, you'd need a similar strategy; notify to the toplevel for
> > > > hot-unplug (disconnect in ALSA), and sync with the stop operation, then continue the rest of its own remove procedure.
> > >
> > > OK, it needs ALSA SoC framework side new feature.
> >
> > Not only ASoC but also in all ALSA component generally.
> > The component-level hot unplug isn't implemented yet properly.
> >
> > > But can I confirm current situation ?
> > >
> > > In ALSA SoC, it has Card/CPU/Codec/Platform drivers, and we can unbind these randomly.
> > > Now, if I unbind CPU first, it checks connected Card, and will disconnect it if needed (Then, other drivers are as-is).
> > > Because of this, Card will be disconnected automatically, and we can't use it again if user didn't remove all other
> > > remaining drivers and re-bind all drivers again. This is current ALSA SoC I think.
> > >
> > > If my understanding was correct, your idea is that we want to call remove function for all connected drivers somehow.
> > > And then, Card want to wait all drivers are removed. Correct ?
> >
> > Right. Unless we really want to support the hog-plug/unplug of each
> > component, it'd be more straightforward to do the full hot-unplug upon
> > every component unbind action.
> >
> > > I'm happy to work for it.
> > > But adding new unplug feature is for sync with all "drivers", and this patch is sync for "clk" for my CPU driver.
> > > Can we separate these ?
> >
> > It belongs with the same thing. Basically you're tweaking clk per PCM
> > stream status. By handling the full hot-plug properly, the PCM stream
> > is assured to be stopped, thus you don't have to fiddle with clk in
> > the remove callback at all.
>
> So my idea is something like below (totally untested): call
> snd_card_disconnect_sync() at the remove call of each component at the
> beginning.
> That assures stopping all pending operations and syncs with the file
> releases. For ASoC, we may want to wrap it with ASoC structs, but you
> can have an idea by this patch.
An obvious spinlock was forgotten in one place, the revised patch
below.
Takashi
---
diff --git a/include/sound/core.h b/include/sound/core.h
index 4104a9d1001f..5f181b875c2f 100644
--- a/include/sound/core.h
+++ b/include/sound/core.h
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct snd_card {
struct device card_dev; /* cardX object for sysfs */
const struct attribute_group *dev_groups[4]; /* assigned sysfs attr */
bool registered; /* card_dev is registered? */
+ wait_queue_head_t remove_sleep;
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
unsigned int power_state; /* power state */
@@ -240,6 +241,7 @@ int snd_card_new(struct device *parent, int idx, const char *xid,
struct snd_card **card_ret);
int snd_card_disconnect(struct snd_card *card);
+void snd_card_disconnect_sync(struct snd_card *card);
int snd_card_free(struct snd_card *card);
int snd_card_free_when_closed(struct snd_card *card);
void snd_card_set_id(struct snd_card *card, const char *id);
diff --git a/sound/core/init.c b/sound/core/init.c
index 32ebe2f6bc59..5cde6cc0d867 100644
--- a/sound/core/init.c
+++ b/sound/core/init.c
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ int snd_card_new(struct device *parent, int idx, const char *xid,
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
init_waitqueue_head(&card->power_sleep);
#endif
+ init_waitqueue_head(&card->remove_sleep);
device_initialize(&card->card_dev);
card->card_dev.parent = parent;
@@ -452,6 +453,17 @@ int snd_card_disconnect(struct snd_card *card)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_card_disconnect);
+void snd_card_disconnect_sync(struct snd_card *card)
+{
+ snd_card_disconnect(card);
+ spin_lock_irq(&card->files_lock);
+ wait_event_lock_irq(card->remove_sleep,
+ list_empty(&card->files_list),
+ card->files_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&card->files_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_card_disconnect_sync);
+
static int snd_card_do_free(struct snd_card *card)
{
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS)
@@ -957,6 +969,8 @@ int snd_card_file_remove(struct snd_card *card, struct file *file)
break;
}
}
+ if (list_empty(&card->files_list))
+ wake_up_all(&card->remove_sleep);
spin_unlock(&card->files_lock);
if (!found) {
dev_err(card->dev, "card file remove problem (%p)\n", file);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-05 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-01 4:34 [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: stop all working stream when .remove Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-01 7:29 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-09-01 7:48 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-01 8:17 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-09-04 17:44 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-04 18:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-09-04 18:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-09-05 7:40 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-05 8:09 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-09-05 8:58 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-05 9:33 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-09-05 10:07 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-05 10:12 ` Mark Brown
2017-09-05 11:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-09-05 12:58 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2017-09-26 8:21 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-27 5:14 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-10-06 13:19 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-10-10 8:00 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-10-11 6:52 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2017-09-05 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2017-09-05 14:08 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5h8thtnvyq.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox